Radiation Dosimetry
Monte Carlo simulation and verification of a scanning proton beam nozzle
Yinxiangzi Sheng, Kambiz Shanazi, Weiwei Wang, Zhijie Huang, Nickii Schlegel, Junyu Zhang, Jiayao Sun, Jingfang Zhao
Published 2019-08-25
Cite as Chin J Radiol Med Prot, 2019, 39(8): 635-640. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-5098.2019.08.014
Abstract
ObjectiveTo establish an accurate simulation model for proton scanning beam using Monte Carlo (MC) code.
MethodsThe MC model of proton scanning beam treatment nozzle was established by using MC code FLUKA combined with the geometric structure of the treatment nozzle in Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC). The MC beam model was established through the simulation of the integrated depth dose distribution (IDD) in water and the lateral profile in air at the isocenter points. The model was used to simulate the depth and lateral dose profile of Spread Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) of proton beam. The calucated result were compared with TPS calculation values.
ResultsFor the distal R90, the deviations of simulation and measurement at all energies were less than 0.5 mm. For distal fall off (R80-20), the deviations between simulation and measurement at each energy were within 0.1 mm. The biggest difference between measurement and simulation of the proton beam spot size was within 0.45 mm. The result of simulation and TPS calculation of proton SOBP matched well, with the γ index pass rate being higher than 90% (Criteria: 2 mm, 2%).
ConclusionsThe MC code FLUKA can be used to model the nozzle of scanning proton beam, which can meet the clinical requirements and accurately simulate the proton beam transport in material. After construction and verification on the basis of measurement, this model can be used as a dose verification tool to evaluate clinical proton treatment plans, in order to reduce the beam time for dose verification and thus increase the number of patient treatment in proton therapy.
Key words:
Monte Carlo; Proton therapy; Treatment nozzle; Scanning beam
Contributor Information
Yinxiangzi Sheng
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Kambiz Shanazi
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Weiwei Wang
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Zhijie Huang
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Nickii Schlegel
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Junyu Zhang
College of Physical Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
Jiayao Sun
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
Jingfang Zhao
Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center/Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
