Original Article
A comparative study on preoperative portal vein embolization using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres versus coils
Yuan Lei, Wu Yingjun, Xu Yun, Chu Kaijian, Feng Feiling, Wu Xiaobing, Yi Bin, Yang Yefa, Jiang Xiaoqing
Published 2020-03-28
Cite as Chin J Hepatobiliary Surg, 2020,26(03): 208-212. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-8118.2020.03.012
Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) versus coils.
MethodsFrom March 2016 to June 2018, 21 consecutive patients with a future liver remnant (FLR) ratio of less than 45% before planned major hepatectomy for malignant or benign liver diseases were enrolled from the First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital into this study. The patients were divided to receive portal vein embolization (PVE) using TAGM distally and coils proximally (the TC group) and PVE using multiple coils (the CC group). Post-PVE complications, liver function, routine blood tests; FLR hyperplasia, types of liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
ResultsEight patients were included in the TC group. There were 4 males and 4 females, with a mean age of (55.3±7.7) years. Of 13 patients included into the CC group, there were 11 males and 2 females, with a mean age of (52.6±11.3) years. There were no significant differences in sex, age, types of hepatic diseases, volume of FLR, ratio of FLR, ratio of standard FLR, types of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, major complications, and liver failure rates between the two groups. All patients in the two groups had successful PVE. The TC group developed effective growth of volume of FLR with one patient who failed to undergo surgery because of tumor progression. In the CC group, four patients failed to undergo liver resection: one patient developed thrombosis of the left branch and main trunk of portal vein; tumor progression occurred in one patient and two patients had insufficient FLR growth. Compared with the CC group, the TC group had a significantly higher volume of FLR hyperplasia [(9.0±2.8) % vs. (5.2±3.8) %, P<0.05], and a faster but insignificant increase in proliferation rate [(11.4±7.1) ml/d vs. (6.9±5.2) ml/d, P>0.05], a greater but insignificant increase in percentage of proliferation [(33.6±20.1) % vs. (20.9±15.1) %, P>0.05].
ConclusionsThis study showed that PVE with TAGM plus coils is safe and effective. It induced a better degree of hypertrophy of FLR compared to PVE using multiple coils.
Key words:
Liver diseases; Portal vein embolization; Tris-acryl gelatin microsphere; Coils; Major hepatectomy
Contributor Information
Yuan Lei
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Wu Yingjun
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Xu Yun
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Chu Kaijian
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Feng Feiling
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Wu Xiaobing
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Yi Bin
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Yang Yefa
The First Department of Interventional Radiology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
Jiang Xiaoqing
The First Department of Biliary Surgery, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
