Clinical Medicine
Effect of fluid overload on the prognosis of patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy
Yuting Li, Hongxiang Li, Dong Zhang
Published 2019-01-10
Cite as Chin J Emerg Med, 2019, 28(1): 68-74. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.01.013
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between fluid overload(FO) and prognosis of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), so as to provide a basis for the reasonable optimization of fluid management and improve the prognosis of critically ill patients with AKI.
MethodsWe enrolled 261 adult AKI patients receiving CRRT who were admitted in ICU Department of the First Hospital of Jinlin University from January 2012 to June 2017. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all enrolled patients and compared the clinical data between the survival group (n=149) and the death group (n=112). We screened and analyzed the risk factors of 30-day mortality after entering ICU of AKI critically ill patients receiving CRRT through multiple Logistic regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to compare the difference of 30-day mortality after entering ICU between the subgroups of fluid overload and non-fluid overload patients.
Results①The 30 day mortality was significantly higher in AKI patients receiving CRRT when the following situation existed: %FO total≥10%(OR=1.30, 95%CI:1.13-2.05, P=0.01), ventilator dependency(OR=1.65, 95%CI:1.01-2.55, P=0.03), oliguria(OR=1.55, 95%CI:1.13-2.15), SOFA≥13(OR=1.15, 95%CI:1.01-1.20, P<0.01), the time from the diagnosis of AKI to the start of CRRT >3 days (OR=1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.13, P=0.04) and mean arterial pressure<72 mmHg (OR=1.10, 95%CI:1.00-1.30, P=0.04).②There was significant difference in the 30 day survival rate between the fluid overload group (n=92) and the non-fluid overload group (n=169) (P<0.01). ③Sub group analysis: group1(n=130): %FO pre-CRRT <10% and %FO total<10%; group 2 (n=39): %FO pre-CRRT ≥10% and %FO total<10%; group 3 (n=64): %FO pre CRRT <10% and %FO total≥10%; group 4 (n=28): %FO pre-CRRT≥10% and %FO total≥ 10%. There was a significant difference in the survival rate between the four groups, that was group 1 >group 2> group 3> group > 4 (P<0.01).④The 30 day survival rate was significantly different between fluid overload patients(n=62) and non-fluid overload patients (n=92) in the septic group (P<0.01), while in the non-septic group the 30-day survival rate had no significant difference between fluid overload patients (n=31) and non-fluid overload patients (n=76) (P=0.291). The 30-day survival rate was significant different between fluid overload patients (n=57) and non-fluid overload patients (n=78) in the SOFA≥13 group (P=0.026), while in the SOFA<13 group the 30-day survival rate had no significant difference between fluid overload patients (n=35) and non-fluid overload patients (n=91) (P=0.074).
ConclusionsFluid overload is closely associated with poor prognosis of critical ill patients with AKI. The removal of too much fluid through CRRT appears to reduce the mortality of severe AKI patients. The adverse effect of fluid overload on survival is more evident in AKI patients with sepsis or with more severe illness (SOFA≥13).
Key words:
Fluid overload; Acute kidney injury; Continuous renal replacement therapy; Prognosis
Contributor Information
Yuting Li
Intensive Care Unit, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Hongxiang Li
Intensive Care Unit, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
Dong Zhang
Intensive Care Unit, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
