Original Article
Comparison of efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin and linagliptin in overweight or obesity type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control of oral antidiabetic drugs
Lunpan Mou, Jianjia Jiang, Yaping Zhang, Lunya Kang, Zhenzhen Hong, Jinbo Su, Zhenzhong Lin, Desong Ming
Published 2019-03-27
Cite as Chin J Diabetes Mellitus, 2019, 11(3): 190-195. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2019.03.006
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin versus linagliptin in overweight or obesity type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control of oral antidiabetc drugs.
MethodsT2DM patients with body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.5%-9.0% were recruited in this randomized, open-labelled, parallel-group study from March 2017 to January 2018 in the Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University. A total of 141 subjects (74 males and 67 females) with a mean age of (49.5±11.8) years who received metformin (at least 1 500 mg/d) and sulfonylureas (at least half of the maximal dose) for at least 3 months were randomly assigned to 2 groups: additional 24-week treatment of dapagliflozin 10 mg once a day (n=71) or linagliptin 5 mg once a day (n=70). HbA1c, plasma glucose, body weight, blood pressure, lipid profiles, serum uric acid, urinary albumin/creatinine and adverse events at baseline and after 24 weeks were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-Square test for different data.
ResultsCompared with the data of baseline, HbA1c decreased 1.2%±0.4% in dapagliflozin group (8.6%±0.4% to 7.4%±0.5%) and 0.9%±0.4% in linagliptin group (8.5%±0.4% to 7.6%±0.6%) (t=3.61, P=0.00) respectively after 24-week treatment. The proportion of patients with HbA1c less than 7.0% were 53.5% (38/71) and 34.2% (24/70) in dapagliflozin group and linagliptin group (χ2=5.32, P=0.02), respectively. The reduction of body weight from baseline to week 24 was significantly greater in dapagliflozin group with a decrease of 2 (1.1, 2.0) kg than that in linagliptin group with a decrease of -0.3 (-0.5,0) kg (Z=-9.50, P=0.00). After 24-week treatment, SBP decreased (8.0±6.3) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) in dapagliflozin group and (1.0±3.0) mmHg in linagliptin group respectively, the difference was statistically significant (t=7.93, P=0.00); DBP decrease (2.5±2.4) mmHg in dapagliflozin group and (1.0±1.8) mmHg in linagliptin group respectively, the difference was statistically significant (t=3.91, P=0.00). After 24-week treatment, the occurrence of hypoglycemia was similar in dapagliflozin and linagliptin groups [14.1% (10/71) vs 12.9% (9/70), χ2=0.05, P=0.51]. A female urinary tract infection and a male genital infection were reported in dapagliflozin group.
ConclusionsBoth dapagliflozin and linagliptin treatment are effective in overweight or obesity type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control of oral antidiabetic drugs. Dapagliflozin is better than linagliptin in controlling of plasma glucose, body weight and blood pressure, and the safety of two groups is similar.
Key words:
Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Overweight; Obesity; Dapagliflozin; Linagliptin
Contributor Information
Lunpan Mou
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Jianjia Jiang
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Yaping Zhang
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Lunya Kang
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Zhenzhen Hong
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Jinbo Su
Department of Endocrinology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Zhenzhong Lin
Department of Clinical Lab, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China
Desong Ming
Department of Clinical Lab, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou 362000, China