Original Article
A comparative study of the respiratory indirect calorimetry and HB coefficient method for the guidance of the target energy in patients with sepsis
Yang Xiaojuan, Zhang Jun, Wang Lijuan, Ma Xigang
Published 2019-08-30
Cite as Chin J Clin Nutr, 2019, 27(4): 238-243. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-635X.2019.04.007
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of nutritional supports following target energy measured by respiratory indirect calorimetry and HB coefficient method respectively on the nutrition and immune indexes of patients with sepsis.
MethodsA prospective comparative study of 60 patients with sepsis who was suitable for nutritional support and respiratory indirect calorimetry in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the hospital from January 2015 to October 2015 was conducted. Resting Energy Expenditure (REE) was measured simultaneously by respiratory indirect calorimetry (n=30) and HB coefficient (Harris-Benedict formula×stress coefficient, n=30) in patients with sepsis and the nutritional support was given according to the MREE measured by the two methods. The nutritional and immune indexes were obtained at 0 day, 3 day, 7 day, and 14 day after nutritional support. The nutritional and immune indexes at 0 day were considered as the baseline and the differences in the nutritional and immune indexes between the baseline and 3 day, 7 day and 14 day were expressed as a "Δ". Values of Δ were compared between the two goups.
ResultsWith nutritional support for 3 days, Δalbumin, Δ prealbumin, Δthe total T lymphocytes, Δassist/induction of T cells and ΔIgG were higher in the respiratory indirect calorimetry group than in the HB coefficient group ( P<0.05). With nutritional support for 7 days, Δalbumin, ΔT lymphocytes, ΔIgM were higher in the respiratory indirect calorimetry group than in the HB coefficient group (P<0.05). With nutritional support for 14 days, Δtransferrin, Δsuppression/cytotoxic T cells, ΔIgG, ΔIgA, ΔC3 andΔC4 were higher in the respiratory indirect calorimetry group than in the HB coefficient group(P<0.05).
ConclusionNutritional support with REE measured by respiratory indirect calorimetry in patients with sepsis is more effective on nutritional and immune related indexes improvement have different degrees of improvement, thus respiratory indirect calorimetry is more suitable to guide the target energy of sepsis patients.
Key words:
Sepsis; Target energy; Respiratory indirect calorimetry; HB coefficient; Nutrition
Contributor Information
Yang Xiaojuan
Department of Intensive Care Unit Ningxia Medical University General Hospital, Yinchuan 750004, China
Zhang Jun
Wang Lijuan
Ma Xigang
