Original Article
Clinical analysis of different treatment options for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis
Ping Chen, Bingzhong Su, Chunli Cong, Hongxia Wang, Tong Zhang, Jianjun Ren, Qi Wang, Xudong Liu
Published 2019-01-15
Cite as Chin J Dig, 2019, 39(1): 40-44. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1432.2019.01.009
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different treatment options for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis (CCL), and try to find the ideal treatment.
MethodsFrom January 2006 to January 2016, a total of 3 107 patients with CCL from the Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University were enrolled. Among them, 1 283 patients were in open cholecystectomy (OC) and open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) group, 964 patients were in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) group, and 860 patients were in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)+ LC group. The clinical data of the three groups were analysed. One-way analysis of variance and chi-square test were performed for statistical analysis.
ResultsFrom 2006 to 2010, the percentage of patients treated with OC+ OCBDE, LC+ LCBDE, and ERCP+ LC were 56.05%(829/1 479), 25.15%(372/1 479) and 18.80%(278/1 479), respectively; from 2011 to 2016, the percentage of patients received the above three treatments were 27.89%(454/1 628), 36.36%(592/1 628) and 35.75%(582/1 628), respectively. The difference in the proportion of the same treatment at different times was statistically significant (χ2=4.775, 4.168 and 0.669, all P<0.05). The success rate of surgery in the OC+ OCBDE group was 100.00%(1 370/1 370); while the success rate of surgery in the LC+ LCBDE group was 94.26%(920/976), and 56 patients converted to OC+ OCBDE; the success rate of surgery in the ERCP+ LC group was 95.00% (817/860), and 31 patients converted to OC+ OCBDE, and 12 patients to LC+ LCBDE. The intraoperative complication in OC+ OCBDE, LC+ LCBDE and ERCP+ LC were 2.85%(39/1 370), 3.48%(32/920) and 1.22%(10/817), respectively. The incidence rates of postoperative complication were 4.89%(67/1 370), 5.34%(50/920) and 5.51%(45/817), respectively. The incidence rates of intraoperative complication of the ERCP+ LC group was lower than that of OC+ OCBDE group and LC+ LCBDE group, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=6.203 and 3.001; both P<0.05). However there was no significant difference in incidence rate of postoperative complications among the three groups (all P>0.05). The hospital stay of the OC+ OCBDE group, the LC+ LCBDE group and the ERCP+ LC group were (6.7±1.3) days, (5.6±1.2) days and (10.9±1.6) days, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (F=90.010, P<0.01). The hospitalization expenses of OC+ OCBDE group, LC+ LCBDE group and ERCP+ LC group were (13 720±1 910) yuan, (18 150±1 490) yuan and (25 830±2 430) yuan, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (F=302.991, P<0.01).
ConclusionThe first choice of patients with CCL is endoscopic minimally invasive treatment and open surgery can be used as a remedial method for endoscopic treatment.
Key words:
Cholecysto-choledocholithiasis; Endoscopic minimally invasive treatment; Open surgery
Contributor Information
Ping Chen
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Bingzhong Su
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Chunli Cong
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Hongxia Wang
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Tong Zhang
Department of Gastroenterology and Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Jianjun Ren
Department of Gastroenterology and Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Qi Wang
Department of Gastroenterology and Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China
Xudong Liu
Department of Gastroenterology and Emergency Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot 010050, China