Molecular Targete Diagnosis and Therapy
Visible light emitted quantum dots targeting EGFR in triple-negative breast cancer
Wang Wenxia, Liu Zhen, Gai Yongkang, Jiang Yaqun, Yuan Lujie, Lan Xiaoli
Published 2020-05-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2020, 40(5): 260-267. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20190930-00214
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility and conditions of in vitro and in vivo imaging of triple-negative breast cancer using visible light emitted quantum dots(QDs) as the carrier to target epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
MethodsThe water-soluble QDs reacted with Cetuximab to synthesize the probe QD-Cetuximab. The morphology, particle size, stability and luminescence properties of the probe were examined. Human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-468 (EGFR+ ) and MDA-MB-453 (EGFR-) were cultured. Cytotoxicity assays, in vitro imaging and fluorescence intensity quantification were performed after cells incubation with QD-Cetuximab and QDs. Eight MDA-MB-468 tumor-bearing mice models were constructed, 100 μl QD-Cetuximab and QDs were injected through the tail vein. In vivo imaging and probe distribution were obtained at different time points. Independent-sample t test was used to analyze the data.
ResultsQD-Cetuximab had a particle size of (40.34±2.44) nm detected by transmission electron microscope (TEM), a hydrated particle size of (57.85±4.69) nm detected by dynamic light scattering (DLS), and a stable structure. When the concentration of QD-Cetuximab was ≤50 nmol/L, the relative survival rate of cells was more than 90%, and when the concentration exceeded 100 nmol/L, the relative survival rate of cells was reduced to (72.52±4.91)% (P<0.05). The red fluorescence of MDA-MB-468 incubated with QD-Cetuximab was stronger than that of MDA-MB-468 incubated with QDs and MDA-MB-453 incubated with QD-Cetuximab or QDs. The confocal fluorescent intensity quantitative determination showed that the ratio of QD-Cetuximab group/QDs group was 5.1 (863.36/169.97). Flow cytometry showed that the uptake of QD-Cetuximab and QDs by MDA-MB-468 increased with incremental incubating concentration, and the former was more significantly(t values: 12.25-38.11, all P<0.05). When the incubating concentration was 25, 50, 100, and 200 nmol/L, the quantitative average fluorescent intensity ratio of QD-Cetuximab group/QDs group was 5.4, 6.9, 7.4 and 6.2, respectively. The QD-Cetuximab and QDs probes mainly accumulated in the liverin vivo. The fluorescence emitted by tumor was not obvious under the high fluorescence of liver as a background. However, the fluorescence was visible in the isolated tumor tissue, and the quantitative fluorescence intensity of experimental group and control group were (2.46±0.60)×104 and (1.29±0.05)×104, respectively (t=3.392, P=0.015).
ConclusionsCetuximab can increase the targeting ability of QDs and promote cell uptake. Although the isolated tumor imaging results are acceptable, further modification of QDs should be considered to reduce the liver uptake and improving in vivo fluorescence imaging efficiency.
Key words:
Breast neoplasms; Receptor, epidermal growth factor; Quantum dots; Antibodies, monoclonal; Tumor cells, cultured; Mice, nude
Contributor Information
Wang Wenxia
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Liu Zhen
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Gai Yongkang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Jiang Yaqun
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Yuan Lujie
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Lan Xiaoli
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Hubei Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China