Clinical Investigation
Classification of therapeutic effect and influencing factors in patients with high-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma after surgery and 131I treatment
Qian Zhou, Ruihua Wang, Baoping Liu, Xingmin Han
Published 2021-11-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 41(11): 664-669. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20200812-00310
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the classification of the therapeutic effect of patients with high-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) after surgery and 131I treatment, and to analyze the relevant factors that affect the therapeutic effect.
MethodsFrom January 2015 to January 2018, 256 high-risk DTC patients (70 males, 186 females; age (47.6±12.9) years) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. According to the 2015 American Thyroid Association(ATA)guidelines for therapeutic effect classification standards and the data measured during 6 months postoperative stimulation state, patients were divided into excellent response (ER) group, inderterminate response (IDR) group, biochemical incomplete response (BIR) group and structurally incomplete response (SIR) group, and the latter two groups were further combined into incomplete response (IR) group. χ2 test, Fisher exact test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test were used to compare the clinical characteristics among the four groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the relationship with ER and IR was established. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the independent influencing factors of ER and IR. The subgroups with B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF)V006E results were individually tested with χ2 test of therapeutic efficacy.
ResultsThere were 48.05%(123/256), 20.31%(52/256), 19.53%(50/256) and 12.11%(31/256) of DTC patients in ER, IDR, BIR and SIR groups respectively. The differences in gender (χ2=11.495, P=0.008), tumor size (H=21.368, P<0.001), N stage (χ2=42.012, P<0.001), distant metastasis (P<0.001) and pre-ablation stimulated thyroglobulin (psTg) level (H=142.829, P<0.001) were statistically significant among the 4 groups. The cut-off values of psTg for predicting ER and IR were 5.38 μg/L and 15.85 μg/L with the sensitivities of 79.7%(98/123) and 88.9%(72/81), with the specificities of 84.2%(112/133) and 91.4%(160/175) respectively. The cut-off values of tumor size for predicting ER and IR were 1.45 cm and 1.95 cm with the sensitivities of 63.4%(78/123) and 53.1%(43/81), with the specificities of 66.2%(88/133) and 74.3%(130/175) respectively. Multivariate regression analysis showed that female (odds ratio (OR)=2.305, 95% CI: 1.041-5.104), N0 stage (OR=2.365, 95% CI: 1.104-5.066), psTg<5.38 μg/L (OR=17.271, 95% CI: 8.561-34.841) and tumor size <1.5 cm (OR=2.194, 95% CI: 1.092-4.409) were independent predictors of ER; psTg≥15.85 μg/L (OR=81.544, 95% CI: 30.561-217.577), N1b stage (OR=3.617, 95% CI: 1.276-10.253) and tumor size >4.0 cm(OR=47.060, 95% CI: 2.449-904.360) were independent predictors of IR. The BRAFV006E mutation rate of patients in the distant metastasis subgroup of the SIR group was significantly lower than that in ER, IDR, and BIR groups (χ2 values: 20.852-40.905, all P<0.008).
ConclusionsAbout 48.05% of high-risk patients can achieve ER half a year after the initial treatment and be classified as low-risk again. Female, patients with N0 stage, psTg<5.38 μg/L and tumor size <1.5 cm have better therapeutic effect after initial treatment; patients with N1b stage, psTg≥15.85 μg/L and tumor size >4.0 cm have poor therapeutic effect after initial treatment.
Key words:
Thyroid neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Iodine radioisotopes; Treatment outcome; Thyroglobulin; Forecasting
Contributor Information
Qian Zhou
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Zhengzhou 450052, China
Ruihua Wang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Zhengzhou 450052, China
Baoping Liu
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Zhengzhou 450052, China
Xingmin Han
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial Key Medical Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Zhengzhou 450052, China