Fibroblast Activating Protein Targeted Imaging
Application value of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in evaluating renal fibrosis disease
Zhou Yue, Huang Yuexi, Huang Yilin, Wang Yujie, Li Ying, Luo Wenbin, Lei Lei, Liu Lin, Ou Santao, Chen Yue
Published 2021-12-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 41(12): 727-731. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20210926-00338
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the value of 68Ga-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraazacyclododecane-1, 4, 7, 10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA)-fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI)-04 PET/CT on assessing different pathological grades in patients with renal fibrosis.
MethodsA total of 25 patients (11 males, 14 females; age (39.3±13.9) years) diagnosed with renal fibrosis in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from September 2020 to August 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent renal puncture examination and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examination. The pathological results of kidney puncture were as the " gold standard" to divide the patients into mild fibrosis (Ⅰ), moderate fibrosis (Ⅱ), and severe fibrosis (Ⅲ). At the same time, 20 patients (10 males, 10 females; age (47.5±13.2) years) who underwent 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT examination showed no abnormal uptake of radioactivity in bilateral kidneys and no history of urinary system related diseases were enrolled as normal controls. Parameters including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of both kidneys, the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) of the liver, target/background ratio (TBR), glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and serum creatinine (Scr) were collected. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Bonferroni correction method were used to compare the differences of SUVmax, SUVmean, TBR and Scr among groups. One-way analysis of variance and least significant difference (LSD) t test were used to compare the difference of GFR among groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of SUVmax for the degree of renal fibrosis.
ResultsOf 25 patients, 22 had increased imaging agent uptake and the sensitivity of 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in diagnosing renal fibrosis was 88%. The SUVmax and TBR of patients with fibrosis grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than those of controls (SUVmax: 4.40(3.30, 4.50), 5.90(4.28, 6.48), 8.50(7.50, 9.73) and 1.44(1.38, 1.68); TBR: 6.340±2.389, 8.097±1.420, 11.343±2.002 and 2.986±0.645; H values: 33.685, 32.368, all adjusted P<0.05 (Bonferroni correction method)). The Scr of patients with fibrosis grade Ⅰ and Ⅲ were significantly different (70.1(55.4, 92.5) and 174.1(161.4, 498.2) μmol/L;H=9.770, adjusted P<0.05 (Bonferroni correction method)). The liver SUVmean of patients with renal fibrosis grades Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than that of controls (0.673±0.129, 0.751±0.170 and 0.514±0.142; H=15.609, both adjusted P<0.05 (Bonferroni correction method)). The GFR of patients with fibrosis grade Ⅲ had significant differences with grade Ⅰ and Ⅱ ((27.867±15.747), (87.756±31.657) and (63.160±29.556) ml/min;F=8.298, both P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.946 7 (95%CI: 0.899 6-0.993 8, P<0.001).
Conclusion68Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT has a certain value in evaluating the degree of renal fibrosis, which can be used as a supplementary examination method for diagnosing renal fibrosis.
Key words:
Fibrosis; Kidney; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed; 68Ga-FAPI
Contributor Information
Zhou Yue
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 646000, China
Huang Yuexi
Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
Huang Yilin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 646000, China
Wang Yujie
Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
Li Ying
Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
Luo Wenbin
Department of Cardiology, Daping Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Lei Lei
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 646000, China
Liu Lin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 646000, China
Ou Santao
Department of Nephrology, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China
Chen Yue
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Academician (Expert) Workstation of Sichuan Province, Luzhou 646000, China