Clinical Investigation
Application of radionuclide renal dynamic imaging combined with double plasma method in evaluation of split renal glomerular filtration rates pre- and post-interventional treatment in patients with unilateral hydronephrosis
Wu Yuping, Lu Keyi, Zhang Xiaoyu, Li Congge, Hu Guang
Published 2022-08-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 42(8): 473-477. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20201224-00460
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the value of 99Tcm-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) renal dynamic imaging combined with double plasma glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the evaluation of split renal function in adult patients undergoing interventional therapy for unilateral hydronephrosis.
MethodsRetrospective analysis of 79 patients (39 males, 40 females, age (41.4±16.3) years) with unilateral hydronephrosis in First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from January 2015 to December 2019 were performed. All patients underwent surgery to relive obstruction. 99Tcm-DTPA renal dynamic imaging was performed before and after surgery to obtain bilateral renogram and GFR was measured by Gates method (marked as gGFR). Meanwhile, the corrected double plasma method was used to measure the GFR of both kidneys (marked as dGFRall). Double plasma GFR of the affected kidney (marked as dGFR) was obtained according to the ratio of renogram and dGFRall. Patients were divided into mild to moderate group (dGFR≥20 and <40 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2 ), severe group (dGFR≥10 and <20 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2) and extremely severe group (dGFR<10 ml·min-1·1.73 m-2) according to dGFR before surgery. Postoperative renal dynamic imaging and dGFR were reexamined to analyze the GFR recovery values (ΔgGFR, ΔdGFR). Data were analyzed by χ2 test, paired t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson correlation analysis and Bland-Altman consistency test.
ResultsThere were 34 patients in mild to moderate group, 24 patients in severe group, 21 patients in extremely severe group. Significant differences were found in both gGFR and dGFR before and after surgery in mild to moderate group, as well as those in the extremely severe group (t values: 2.42-3.34, all P<0.05 ), but there was no significant difference in severe group (t values: 1.24, 1.27, both P>0.05). The ΔgGFR and ΔdGFR were not significantly different among three groups (F values: 0.45, 0.34, both P>0.05). GFR mesured by the 2 methods (gGFR, dGFR) before and after operation correlated well in each group (before surgery, r values: 0.68-0.82; after surgery, r values: 0.80-0.91, all P<0.001). GFR measured by the two methods showed poor consistency in the mild to moderate and severe groups (>5%(5.88%, 2/34; 8.33%, 2/24) values before and after surgery exceeding 95% consistency limit), while good consistency was demonstrated in the extremely severe group (<5%(4.76%, 1/21) values before and after surgery exceeding 95% consistency limit).
ConclusionsPreoperative GFR in patients with unilateral hydronephrosis cannot predict the recovery of renal function after interventional treatment. For the evaluation of split renal GFR in patients with unilateral upper urinary tract obstructive hydronephrosis, corrected dual plasma method combined with kidney ratio of renogram is more appropriate for the determination of GFR. Gates method has some limitations, however, it can be recommended for the evaluation of GFR in patients with extremely severe renal impairment before and after interventional surgery.
Key words:
Hydronephrosis; Glomerular filtration rate; Radionuclide imaging; Tomography, X-ray computed; Technetium Tc 99m pentetate
Contributor Information
Wu Yuping
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Molecular Imaging of Precision Medicine, Taiyuan 030001, China
Lu Keyi
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Molecular Imaging of Precision Medicine, Taiyuan 030001, China
Zhang Xiaoyu
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Molecular Imaging of Precision Medicine, Taiyuan 030001, China
Li Congge
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Molecular Imaging of Precision Medicine, Taiyuan 030001, China
Hu Guang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Collaborative Innovation Center for Molecular Imaging of Precision Medicine, Taiyuan 030001, China