Clinical Study
Co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and recombined-human chorionic gonadotropin in patients with low proportion of mature oocytes during in vitro fertilization treatment
Wang Linlin, Guo Wei, Yang Rui, Li Hongzhen, Wang Ying, Li Rong, Qiao Jie
Published 2020-06-25
Cite as Chin J Reprod Contracep, 2020, 40(6): 439-446. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20190506-00183
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) combined with recombined-human chorionic gonadotropin (r-hCG) trigger (dual trigger) in improving the low proportion of mature oocytes in ovarian normal responders in GnRH antagonist cycles.
MethodsRetrospective study was preformed to compare the stimulation characteristics of 366in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between March 2016 and August 2017 in Reproductive Medical Science Center of Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into group A (normal ovarian responders who were triggered with r-hCG only during IVF treatment resulted in low proportion of mature oocytes and failure IVF attempt, n=123), group B (dual trigger group, n=123), and group C (different patients of the corresponding period form group B, triggered with r-hCG only, n=120). The general characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared among these three groups.
ResultsThe basic characteristic date including age, assisted reproductive technology (ART) indications, duration of infertility, basal hormonal level among the three groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The ICSI fertilization rate (90.4%vs. 83.8%, P<0.001), and the rate of metaphase-II (MII) oocyte in group B was significantly higher than that in group A (77.6% vs. 44.7%, P<0.001). In addition, patients in group B had a significantly higher number of high-quality embryos (1.6±0.6vs. 0.3±0.3, P=0.01), the number of embryos transferred (1.8±0.8 vs. 0.6±0.4, P=0.02), the clinical pregnancy rate (35.5%vs. 0%, P<0.001) and the live birth rate (31.8%vs. 0%, P<0.001) in the fresh embryo transfer cycle, the clinical pregnancy rate (32.1%vs. 0%, P<0.001) and the live birth rate (28.0%vs. 0%, P<0.001) in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle while lower rate of cycle cancellation (10.6%vs. 27.6%, P<0.001) than group A. As compared with group C, the number of oocytes retrieved was not statistically significant, while the number of high-quality embryos (1.6±0.6vs. 4.0±2.6, P=0.02), the number of two pronucleus (2PN) embryos (5.0±2.8 vs. 6.3±3.8, P=0.03) and the clinical pregnancy rate (35.5% vs. 58.0%, P<0.001) and the live birth rate (31.8%vs. 46.8%, P=0.02) in the fresh embryo transfer cycle, the clinical pregnancy rate (32.1% vs. 51.3%, P=0.01) and the live birth rate (28.0% vs. 44.4%, P=0.03) in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle were significantly lower.
ConclusionFor patients who have normal ovarian response but low proportion of mature oocytes, co-administration of GnRH-a and standard-dose r-hCG (dual trigger) for final oocyte maturation can improve their IVF outcome.
Key words:
Dual trigger; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist; Oocyte maturation; Normal ovarian responders; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist
Contributor Information
Wang Linlin
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Guo Wei
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Yang Rui
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Li Hongzhen
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Wang Ying
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Li Rong
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Qiao Jie
Reproductive Medical Science Center, Obstetrics &
Gynecology Department, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China