Clinical Report
Reoperation strategies for obstructive azoospermia with initial microsurgical anastomosis failure (21 cases)
Zhao Jingpeng, Li Peng, Chen Huixing, Tian Ruhui, Zhi Erlei, Huang Yuhua, Yao Chencheng, Li Zheng
Published 2022-04-25
Cite as Chin J Reprod Contracep, 2022, 42(4): 394-398. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101441-20201207-00665
Abstract
ObjectiveTo analyze the effectiveness and safety of reoperation for obstructive azoospermia (OA) with initial microsurgical anastomosis failure.
MethodsA retrospective case series was performed for OA patients who underwent reoperation after initial microsurgical anastomosis failure, in Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center from March 2015 to June 2020. Totally, 21 patients were enrolled in the study, and the clinical data, patency and pregnancy outcomes were reviewed.
ResultsDuring the initial surgery, 8 cases underwent vasovasostomy and 8 cases underwent vasoepididymostomy, while the other 5 cases underwent crossover anastomosis; 19 cases underwent reoperation because of reproductive needs, and 2 for post-vasectomy chronic testicular pain. During the reoperation, anastomotic stricture was found in 14 cases, and sperm granuloma was found in 6 cases, while spermatogenic dysfunction was confirmed in 1 case. Unilateral or bilateral anastomosis was performed successfully in 19 cases. Testicular sperm extraction was performed for 1 case with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and 1 case with severe adhesion respectively. Totally 19 cases was followed for 3 to 58 months [(30.21±18.43) months], and 2 cases were lost to follow-up. Chronic testicular pain was relieved completely in 1 of the 2 cases suffering from the post-vasectomy testicular pain. Overall, 11 cases achieved patency, and 4 cases concieved naturally. Furthermore, 3 cases underwent in vitro fertilization cycle (1 case with semen sperm, and the other 2 cases with frozen testicular sperm). There were no severe post-operational complications in all cases.
ConclusionMicrosurgical reoperation, which allows a favorable patency rate and natural pregnancy rate, is a valid option for the treatment of OA with initial microsurgical anastomosis failure.
Key words:
Obstructive azoospermia; Reoperation; Microsurgery; Male infertility
Contributor Information
Zhao Jingpeng
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Li Peng
Shanghai General Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Shanghai 200080, China
Chen Huixing
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Tian Ruhui
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Zhi Erlei
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Huang Yuhua
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Yao Chencheng
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China
Li Zheng
Department of Andrology, Center for Men's Health, Institute of Urology, Urologic Medical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China