Clinical Application
The influence of CT acquisition and reconstruction parameters on the stability of radiomic features of pure ground-glass nodules
Yang Shouxin, Wu Ning, Zhang Li, Li Meng
Published 2022-09-23
Cite as Chin J Oncol, 2022, 44(9): 981-986. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20201127-01024
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of CT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent on the stability of radiomic features of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules.
MethodsA total of 50 pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules in 35 patients were prospectively selected from Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College in 2018. After reconstructing the original image of the same patient′s pulmonary nodules, six sequences of different parameters were obtained. ITK-SNAP software was used to segment different sequences of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules. All scanning data were extracted by A. K. software. The radiomic features with good retest reliability were selected by the intraclass correlation coefficient. The statistical software of R language was used to analyze the characteristic parameters. All the radiomic feature values of different sequences were paired and compared. The number of radiomic features changed by acquisition and reconstruction parameters was counted. The influence of different parameters on the reproducibility of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules was compared.
ResultsA total of 391 radiomic features were extracted from 50 cases of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules. 320 features with an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.75 were selected for further analysis. By changing the three parameters of CT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent simultaneously, the changed radiomic features of the pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules reach 60.9% (195/320), including 6.7% (1/15) morphological feature, 100.0% (40/40) histogram features, and 58.1% (154/265) texture features. When only one parameter was changed (keeping the other two parameters unchanged), changing the CT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent respectively, the changed radiomic features of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules were 10.6% (34/320), 30.9% (99/320) and 50.6% (162/320), the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). When the radiation dose and contrast agent were changed, the radiomic features obtained by the FBP reconstruction algorithm had smaller changes than the features obtained by the 50% ASiR-V algorithm (P=0.001).
ConclusionsCT reconstruction algorithm, radiation dose, and contrast agent will affect the radiomic features of pure ground-glass density pulmonary nodules. The contrast agent has the most significant influence on the radiomic features, followed by radiation dose and CT reconstruction algorithm minimum. Compared with morphological features, histogram features and texture features are more likely to be affected by CT reconstruction algorithms, radiation doses, and contrast agents. Compared with the 50% ASiR-V algorithm, the radiomic features obtained by the FBP reconstruction algorithm are less affected by the radiation dose and contrast agent. The influence of these parameters should be fully considered in the radiomic analysis.
Key words:
Lung neoplasms; Adenocarcinoma; Pure ground-glass nodules; Radiomics; Reproducibility
Contributor Information
Yang Shouxin
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
Wu Ning
PET-CT Center, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
Zhang Li
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
Li Meng
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China