Original Article
Clinical outcomes of severe calcified lesions after carotid artery stenting
Tang Xiao, Tang Hanfei, Fu Weiguo, Yue Jianing, Shi Zhenyu, Si Yi, Li Weimiao, Lin Changpo, Guo Baolei, Guo Daqiao
Published 2022-03-25
Cite as Chin J Gen Surg, 2022, 37(3): 175-179. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20210924-00569
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of non-circumferential severe calcification using the distal embolic protection device.
MethodsClinical data of patients with severe calcification lesions in cervical carotid artery treated by CAS from Jan 2018 to Dec 2020 at our center was analyzed retrospectively.
Results226 consecutively admitted patients of cervical carotid artery stenosis and non-circumferential severe calcification (CR>270°) underwent CAS using the distal embolic protection device. The technical success rate was 90.26%. No death or myocardial infarction occurred during the perioperative period. Two patients had ipsilateral hemiparesis ischemic stroke during post-dilatation. The incidence of perioperative bradycardia/hypotension was 25.34%. Patients were followed up for 6-36 months, with median follow-up period of 17.3 months. The incidence of mild or moderate in-stent restenosis (<70%) was 16.59%, and the incidence of severe in-stent restenosis or occlusion (>70%) was 3.22%.
ConclusionsFor carotid artery stenosis with non-circumferential severe calcification in high risk for CEA patients, carotid artery stenting is safe and effective with the aggressive pre-dilation strategies, strict stent selections and implantation standards. The incidence of perioperative death, myocardial infarction or ipsilateral hemiparesis ischemic stroke was low. The patency rate of the carotid stent in the calcification lesion is satisfactory during the mid-term follow-up.
Key words:
Carotid stenosis; Stent; Calcification; Ischemic stroke; In-stent restenosis
Contributor Information
Tang Xiao
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Tang Hanfei
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Fu Weiguo
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Yue Jianing
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Shi Zhenyu
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Si Yi
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Li Weimiao
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Lin Changpo
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Guo Baolei
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China
Guo Daqiao
Department of Vascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China