Clinical Research
Treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy with spinal nerve root decompression under microscope and percutaneous tubular retractor system
Wei Liangfeng, Chen Yehuang, Xue Liang, Wu Jianwu, Wang Shousen, Zheng Zhaocong
Published 2023-04-15
Cite as Chin J Neuromed, 2023, 22(4): 382-387. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20230111-00018
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy of posterior cervical spinal nerve root decompression under microscope and percutaneous tubular retractor system in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).
MethodsA total of 38 patients with CSR, admitted to Department of Neurosurgery, 900th Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team from September 2019 to October 2022 were enrolled consecutively. These patients failed in strict conservative treatment and then changed to posterior cervical spinal nerve root decompression under microscope and percutaneous tubular retractor system. The patients were followed up for (15.71±7.50) months, ranging from 3 to 36 months. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were recorded and the results of X-ray, CT and MRI of cervical spines were analyzed 1 d before decompression, before discharge and at the last follow-up. C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was measured and compared on CT reconstruction images before decompression and at the last follow-up. The clinical efficacy of these patients was determined according to the formula of improvement rate=([JOA at the last follow-up-preoperative JOA]/[17-preoperative JOA])×100%: 100% improvement rate was defined as cure, improvement rate>60% as significant effect, 25%<improvement rate≤60% as valid treatment, and improvement rate≤25% was defined as invalid treatment.
ResultsThe VAS and JOA scores were 5.91±0.90 and 11.37±1.50 before decompression, and 0.37±0.31 and 15.76±1.44 at the last follow-up, respectively, with significant differences (P<0.05). Among 38 patients, 12 patients (31.6%) were cured, 18 (47.4%) were significantly effective, 7 (18.4%) were valid, and 1 (2.6%) was invalid, enjoying a total effective rate of 97.4%. Neither dural sac tear or obvious nerve injury during decompression nor infection after decompression were noted. The C2-7 SVA at the last follow-up ([15.82±0.95] mm) was significantly lower than preoperative C2-7 SVA ([17.07±1.07] mm, P<0.05).
ConclusionPosterior cervical nerve root decompression can obtain satisfactory results in single segment CSR; combined application of microscope and percutaneous tubular retractor system can effectively ensure the cervical spine stability and retain the corresponding motion segments.
Key words:
Cervical spondylosis; Pain; Nerve root; Microsurgery; Sagittal balance
Contributor Information
Wei Liangfeng
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
Chen Yehuang
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
Xue Liang
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
Wu Jianwu
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
Wang Shousen
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China
Zheng Zhaocong
Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Team, Fuzhou 350025, China