Liao Tian, Yuan Zilong, Niu Yantao, Fu Qing, Liu Xiaoming, Yang Ming, Wu Hongying, Lei Ziqiao, Yu Jianming, Kong Xiangchuang
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) on dose estimations of children's head CT scans.
MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on plain head CT scans of 252 patients with the 64-row detector CT device of Discovery 750HD in the Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from January to September in 2019. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol)values were recorded. The head circumference (HC), area, and CT value were measured using a self-developed computer program, and the water equivalent diameter (WED), size-specific conversion factors (f293 and f220), and absorbed dose (SSDE293 and SSDE220) were calculated according to the AAPM reports 293 and 220.The patients were divided into three groups by the quartering meth odaccording to their HC(<47.8 cm, 47.8-52.7 cm, >52.7 cm)and four groups based on their ages(0-2, 3-6, 7-10 and 11-14 years old). The difference between parameters (f220 and f293, SSDE220 and SSDE293、SSDE293 and CTDIvol) were compared for different groups, and the correlation of HC with f293 and SSDE293 was analyzed.
ResultsThere was an overestimation of f220 by 11.11% (t=252.61, P<0.05) compared withf293. SSDE220 was overestimated by 10.31% (t=228.21, P<0.05) compared with SSDE293, and SSDE293 was underestimated by 9.60% (t=-31.34, P<0.05)compared with CTDIvol. For the three HC groups, SSDE220 was overestimated by 8.54%, 10.37%, and 11.57% (t=73.73, 438.58, 275.52, P<0.05)compared with SSDE293, and SSDE293 was underestimated by 1.30%, 9.79%, and 14.61% (t=-1.91, -60.95, -47.64, P<0.05)compared with CTDIvol. For the four age groups SSDE220 was overestimated by 8.45%, 10.00%, 10.57%, and 11.36% (t=63.58, 232.29, 247.84, 302.95, P< 0.05)compared with SSDE293, and SSDE293 was underestimated by 1.49%, 8.27%, 10.63%, and 13.78% (t=-1.83, -28.27, -37.30, -49.80, P< 0.05)compared with CTDIvol. Furthermore, HC was highly correlated with f293 and SSDE293 (r2=0.88 and 0.76, respectively, P< 0.05).
ConclusionsThe radiation dose in children′s head CT scanning can be more accurately estimated according to the AAPM Report 293, while it can be overestimated by CTDIvol. Meanwhile, the CT radiation dose can be patently overestimated with the AAPM Report 220 compared with Report 293.HC is closely correlated with f293 and SSDE293 and it can be used to estimatee more accurately for SSDE and the radiation dose received by children during head CT scanning.
Key words:
Size-specific dose estimate; Children; Head; Computed Tomography
Contributor Information
Liao Tian
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Yuan Zilong
Department of Radiology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Wuhan 430079, China
Niu Yantao
Department of Radiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing 100005, China
Fu Qing
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Liu Xiaoming
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Yang Ming
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Wu Hongying
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Lei Ziqiao
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Yu Jianming
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China
Kong Xiangchuang
Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan 430022, China