To investigate the clinical result of biological mesh and synthetic mesh in the repair of hiatal hernia.

a prospective cohort study was conducted to collect and analyze the clinical data of 60 patients with hiatal hernia who were treated at Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from May 2019 to Jan 2020. Intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, clinical symptoms (heartburn, acid regurgitation, belching, early satiety, chest pain), VAS score, postoperative recurrence rate and complications were evaluated.

There was no significant difference in the overall repair effect between biological mesh group and synthetic mesh group (P>0.05). All of the 60 patients underwent successful laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and fundoplication. There were no massive bleeding caused by organ or vascular injury, and no peri-operative death. No recurrence of hiatal hernia, massive hemorrhage, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, gastrointestinal fistula, mediastinal infection or abscess were found during the follow-up of 6 months.

There is no significant difference in short-term clinical effect between the use of biological mesh and synthetic mesh after hiatal hernia repair.

Hernia, hiatal; Hernia repair; Mesh