Applied Study and Case Report
Comparison and analysis research on occupational exposure limits of coal dust between China and foreign countries
Li Wenjie, Zhu Qiuhong
Published 2024-02-20
Cite as Chin Ind Hyg Occup Dis, 2024, 42(2): 107-111. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20230829-00046
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study and compare the occupational exposure limits (OELs) of coal dust between China and foreign countries, understand the OEL of coal dust in China, and provide data and basis for revising the OEL of coal dust in China.
MethodsIn August 2023, by searching the official websites of limits setting institutions in relevant countries and regions at home and abroad, collecting and sorting out the OELs of coal dust issued by 10 limit setting institutions in 6 countries and the background information of the formulation, and conducting specific analysis on the classification, limit level and formulation principles of coal dust OEL in each country/institution.
ResultsIn China and Japan, the total dust and respirable dust of coal dust OEL were established respectively, while in other countries, only the time-weighted average concentration (TWA) of respirable coal dust exposure was established. The TWA prescribed by China's Notional Health Commission, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) , the United States Mining Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) and the Australian Safety Work Bureau when the SiO2 content was less than 5% were 5, 2.4, 2 and 3 mg/m3 respectively. China GBZ 2.1-2019 sets the limit of 2.5 mg/m3 for respirable coal dust with SiO2 content less than 10%. The TWA set by the American Conference of Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and the South African Department of Mines and Energy (DME) for anthracite coal were 0.4 and 0.8 mg/m3, respectively, and bituminous coal or lignite were 0.9 and 1.8 mg/m3, respectively. The respirable coal dust TWA set by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the United States was 1 mg/m3, and the TWA set by the New Zealand Work Safety Authority was 3 mg/m3.
ConclusionAt present, the OEL of coal dust in China is at a relatively loose level, and it is suggested to further explore the possibility of revising coal dust OEL.
Key words:
Dust; Occupational exposure; Coal dust; Occupational exposure limit; Comparison research
Contributor Information
Li Wenjie
National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China
Zhu Qiuhong
National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China