Quality evaluation and content analysis of clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of urinary retention after vaginal delivery
Chen Zhangping, Zhuang Huiren, Zhao Wei
Published 2022-10-06
Cite as Chin J Mod Nurs, 2022, 28(28): 3919-3924. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220307-01049
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of guidelines and expert consensus on the prevention of urinary retention after vaginal delivery, so as to provide a reference for clinical prevention and management.
MethodsWe searched the website of Chinese and English guidelines, electronic literature database and professional society website by computer. The articles were evaluated by three researchers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and EvaluationⅡ (AGREE Ⅱ) and the quality evaluation criteria for expert consensus of the Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence-Based Health Care Center, and the recommendations of each guideline and expert consensus were summarized and analyzed.
ResultsA total of six guidelines and one expert consensus were included. The recommendation strength of four guidelines was A, and two guidelines were B, and the overall quality of the guidelines was relatively high. One expert consensus evaluation result was "included". Recommendations related to the prevention of urinary retention after vaginal delivery involved a total of 23 comments of risk screening and preventive measures.
ConclusionsThe quality of the included guidelines and expert consensus is generally high, and their recommendations can provide a reference for the prevention and management of urinary retention after vaginal delivery.
Key words:
Vaginal delivery; Urinary retention; Clinical practice guideline; Expert consensus; Quality evaluation
Contributor Information
Chen Zhangping
School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Zhuang Huiren
Nursing Department, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200123, China
Zhao Wei
School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China