卞荣鹏; 朱浩; 邹国友

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.017

点赞 0
分享 0
收藏 0
纠错

• 临床经验 •

关节镜下半月板部分切除术的临床效果评价

中华关节外科杂志（电子版）, 2020,14(2) : 226-229. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.017

摘要

目的

探究关节镜下半月板部分切除术治疗膝关节半月板损伤的临床效果。

方法

选取2017年11月至2018年11月南通大学第四附属医院骨科收治的膝关节半月板损伤患者98例，其中采用关节镜下半月板部分切除者纳入研究组(n＝49)，应用小切口半月板部分切除者纳入对照组(n＝49)。采用t检验对比分析两组患者的手术时间、手术费用、术前术后的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)，术前术后膝关节Lysholm功能评分，采用卡方检验对比两组的临床治疗效果。

结果

研究组的治疗效果明显优于对照组(χ²＝5.124，P<0.05)、两组患者术前Lysholm评分差异无统计学意义(t＝1.562，P>0.05)，研究组术后3 d(t＝14.154，P<0.05)及术后1年(t＝15.685，P<0.05)的Lysholm评分都显著高于对照组。两组患者术前疼痛评分无差异(P>0.05)，术后3 d研究组患者的静息痛评分(t＝13.974，P<0.05)和行走痛评分(t＝13.976，P<0.05)均低于对照组，术后1年研究组患者的静息痛评分(t＝14.258，P<0.05)和行走痛评分(t＝14.859，P<0.05)亦显著低于对照组。对照组的手术时间短于研究组(t＝8.568，P<0.05)，且手术费用更低(t＝3.405，P<0.05)。

结论

关节镜下半月板部分切除治疗膝关节半月板损伤的临床效果较好，且有创伤小，疼痛轻等优点，小切口半月板部分切除术的技术难度较低，亦可在临床中选择性采用。

引用本文: 卞荣鹏, 朱浩, 邹国友. 关节镜下半月板部分切除术的临床效果评价 [J/OL] . 中华关节外科杂志（电子版）, 2020, 14(2) : 226-229. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.017.

参考文献导出: Endnote NoteExpress RefWorks NoteFirst 医学文献王

扫描看全文

正文

作者信息

基金 0 关键词 0

English Abstract

阅读 0 评论 0

相关资源

引用 | 论文 | 视频

除非特别申明，本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编辑委员会的观点。

光盘如有质量问题，请向编辑部调换

半月板损伤主要表现为撕裂伤，是骨科运动医学最常见的损伤之一，年发病率为24/10 000，其发病高峰集中在年轻的运动人群和患有关节退行性变的中年人群^[1]。手术治疗是治疗半月板损伤的重要方法之一，从开放手术到关节镜手术，从半月板全切术到部分切除术，还有各种新的技术应用，如半月板修复、移植、胶原植入等^[2]。本文通过回顾性分析近年来南通大学第四附属医院骨科采用开放及关节镜下半月板部分切除术治疗的半月板损伤病例，以期对比及评价该两种术式在临床中的应用效果。

贡献者信息

卞荣鹏

224002　盐城，南通大学第四附属医院骨科

朱浩

224002　盐城，南通大学第四附属医院骨科

邹国友

224002　盐城，南通大学第四附属医院骨科

通信作者

邹国友

224002　盐城，南通大学第四附属医院骨科

Email：brpyancheng@163.com

关键词

关节镜; 外科手术，微创性; 半月板; 创伤和损伤; 有效性研究; 疼痛;

作者声明

卞荣鹏，朱浩，邹国友.关节镜下半月板部分切除术的临床效果评价[J/CD]．中华关节外科杂志(电子版)，2020, 14(2)：226－229.

历史

出版日期：2020-04-01

收稿日期：2019-08-05

本文编辑

张姝江林敏颖

Clinical Experience

Clinical effect evaluation of arthroscopic partial menisectomy

Bian Rongpeng, Zhu Hao, Zou Guoyou

Published 2020-04-01

Cite as Chin J Joint Surg(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(2): 226-229. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2020.02.017

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of arthroscopic partial menisectomy in the treatment of knee meniscus injury.

Methods

From November 2017 to November 2018, 98 patients with knee meniscus injury treated in the Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University were collected. Patients in the control group were treated with open meniscectomy (n=49). Patients in the study group were treated with arthroscopic partial menisectomy (n=49). The operation time, cost, visual analogue score(VAS) of preoperative and postoperative pain, preoperative and postoperative Lysholm function score of the knee joint was compared and analyzed by t test. The clinical treatment effect of the two groups was compared by chi-square test.

Results

The treatment effect of the study group was significantly better than that of the control group (χ²=5.124, P <0.05). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between the two groups before surgery ( t=1.562, P>0.05). The Lysholm score of the study group was significantly higher than that of the control group three days (t=14.154, P <0.05) and one year ( t=15.685, P <0.05) after the surgery. There was no difference in the preoperative pain score of two groups ( P> 0.05). The resting pain score (t =13.974, P <0.05) and walk pain score ( t=13.976, P <0.05) in three days after surgey of the study group were lower than the control group, and the resting pain score ( t=14.258, P <0.05) and walk pain score ( t=14.859, P <0.05) one year after surgery of the study group were significantly lower than the control group. The operation time of the control group was shorter than the study group ( t=8.568, P <0.05), and the operation cost was lower ( t=3.405, P <0.05).

Conclusion

Arthroscopic partial menisectomy for meniscus injury has a good clinical effect, and has the advantages of less trauma and less pain, while modified open meniscectomy is easier in technique and can be used selectively in clinic.

Key words:

Arthroscope; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive; Menisci; Wounds and injuries; Validation studies; Pain

Contributor Information

Bian Rongpeng

Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng 224002, China

Zhu Hao

Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng 224002, China

Zou Guoyou

Department of Orthopedics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Yancheng 224002, China

共有条评论

验证码

本文被引情况 CSCD: 0次万方数据： 0次 Scopus: 0次

施引文献(最多仅列5条文献，进入CSCD官网发现更多)

未获取施引文献信息...

暂无相关资源