Standard and Guideline
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021, interpretation and expectation
Zheng Ruiqiang, Zhang Yifen, Rong Ziqi, Huang Wei, Fu Xiaoyun
Published 2021-10-28
Cite as Chin Crit Care Med, 2021, 33(10): 1159-1164. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20211009-01442
Abstract
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 (2021 guidelines) was recently released. The guidelines summarized the evidences from literatures up to July 2019, and composed by 6 parts as "screening and early treatment", "infection", "hemodynamic management", "ventilation", "additional therapies" and "long-term outcomes and goals of care" with a total of 93 items and 99 recommendations. Compared with the 2016 guidelines (96 recommendations), although the total number of recommendations in the 2021 guidelines is similar, the number of "strong recommendations (recommend)" in 2021 guidelines has dropped significantly, as the number of "weak recommendations (suggest)" has increased significantly, and the level of the quality of evidence on which the recommendations are based has been significantly lowered. Furthermore, 2021 guidelines have also markedly deleted or simplified the recommendations regarding infection prevention, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treatment, nutritional support and so on. While, the most obvious improvement appears in the segment of "long-term outcomes and goals of care", in which the patients and their families could get help in term of determining their physical rehabilitation and discharge follow-up plans and formulating exact goals of care. 2021 guidelines did not adopt new and emerging therapies or treatments, such as metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), diaphragm protective ventilation, timing of initiating renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury, early mobility, endotoxin adsorption, tranexamic acid, E-medicine and telemedicine, big data & artificial intelligence and other new therapies. Collectively, it may suggest the 2021 guidelines tend to be conservative and simplified rather than fairly optimized and logicalized, which may arouse controversy in the future and affect clinician compliance.
Key words:
Critical care medicine; Critical care; Guideline; Sepsis; Septic shock
Contributor Information
Zheng Ruiqiang
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Northern Jiangsu Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225001, Jiangsu, China
Zhang Yifen
Department of Critical Care Medicine, 1st Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, Liaoning, China
Rong Ziqi
Department of Critical Care Medicine, 1st Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, Liaoning, China
Huang Wei
Department of Critical Care Medicine, 1st Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011, Liaoning, China
Fu Xiaoyun
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi 563003, Guizhou, China