Original Article
A clinical observational study on the preliminary effect of dupilumab in the treatment of severe asthma
Li You, Lin Huimin, Zhang Xiaoxian, Ou Changxing, Xie Jiaxing, Zhang Qingling
Published 2023-09-12
Cite as Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis, 2023, 46(9): 909-915. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20230713-00374
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect and safety of dupilumab in the treatment of patients with severe asthma in a preliminary clinical observational study.
MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 20 patients with severe asthma who received dupilumab for 4-12 months between 2019 and 2022 at the First Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, comparing pre-and post-treatment laboratory data, oral glucocorticoid dose (OCS), asthma control test (ACT) and adverse effects. The median age of the 20 patients was 48.5 (41.0-52.8) years, including 14 males and 6 females. The clinical data of 10 patients treated with other biologic agents were further analyzed to determine the reasons for switching to biologic drug treatment and the efficacy of dupilumab in these patients. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for comparisons. Mann-Whitney analysis was used for inter-group comparison, and chi-square test or Fisher test was used for inter-group comparisons of count data.
ResultsA total of 20 patients were included in this study. All 20 severe asthma phenotypes were type 2 (T2)-high and completed at least the first 4 months of treatment, including 17 patients who completed 12 months of treatment. Among patients who completed 4 months of treatment, the asthma exacerbation score decreased from 1.0(0.3-1.0) episodes/4 months to 0.0(0.0-1.0) episodes/4 months, P<0.001, and FEV1/FVC increased from 58.4% (50.5%-69.0%) to 66.9% (59.6%-77.7%), P<0.01. The number of patients requiring OCS maintenance therapy decreased from 15 (75%) to 9 (45%), P<0.05. Among patients who completed 12 months of treatment, the asthma exacerbation score decreased from 1.0(0.5-1.0) episodes/4 months to 0.0 (0.0-0.0) episodes/4 months, P<0.01, and FEV1/FVC increased from 57.9% (49.6%-67.8%) to 72.7% (64.6%-78.7%), P<0.01. The number of patients requiring OCS maintenance therapy decreased from 13 (76%) to 6 (35%), P<0.01. In 10 patients with a history of previous biologic therapy, the most common reasons for switching to a biologic were a poor response to previous monoclonal antibodies (40%) and loss of control of asthma symptom control after discontinuation of monoclonal antibodies (30%). The remaining reasons were patients′ uncontrolled symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis (20%) and irregular or underdosed use of previous biologics (10%). After 4 months of switching to dupilumab, 10 patients experienced varying degrees of improvement in asthma control.
ConclusionsThe application of dupilumab for the treatment of T2-high severe asthma showed good efficacy and few adverse effects. Biologically targeted therapy is an important treatment approach to achieving better control of severe asthma.
Key words:
Asthma; Anti-asthmatic agents; Therapeutics; Dupilumab
Contributor Information
Li You
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Lin Huimin
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Zhang Xiaoxian
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Ou Changxing
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Xie Jiaxing
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
Zhang Qingling
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, National Center for Respiratory Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China
本刊2023年第46卷第9期刊出的《度普利尤单抗治疗重度哮喘初步疗效的临床观察研究》一文, 表2中“12个月后FeNO( ppb)”的数值应为“20.0(13.0,31.0)”。特此更正并致歉。