Volume Therapy and Blood Conservation
Efficacy of individualized mini-fluid challenge test in determining fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing surgery in prone position
Yang Xuemei, Liu Minyu, Fan Xiaojun, Xu Shiyuan, Zhang Hongfei
Published 2023-08-20
Cite as Chin J Anesthesiol, 2023, 43(8): 972-976. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131073.20230223.00815
Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of individualized mini-fluid challenge test in determining the fluid responsiveness in the patients undergoing surgery in prone position.
MethodsA total of 47 patients of either sex, aged > 18 yr, with boy mass index of 18-30 kg/m2, of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification Ⅰ or Ⅱ, undergoing elective spinal surgery in prone position, were included. The volume-controlled mode was used for mechanical ventilation, and the tidal volume was set at 8 ml/kg. The hemodynamic parameters were monitored by FloTrac/Vigileo system. The patient was changed to prone position at 5 min after endotracheal intubation (T1), hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 sodium chloride injection 2 ml/kg was intravenously given at 5 min of prone position (T2), and fluid 3 ml/kg was continuously infused at 1 min after 2 ml/kg fluid infusion (T3), and both infusion rates were 0.5 ml·kg-1·min-1. A mini-fluid challenge test was performed during T2-T3 period, the standard volume therapy (total infusion of liquid 5 ml/kg) was carried out from T2 to 1 min after infusion of liquid 3 ml/kg (T4). The rate of change in SV at T3 time point (ΔSVT3) was calculated relative to T2 time point, and the rate of change in SV at T4 time point (ΔSVT4) was calculated relative to T2 time point. Positive fluid responsiveness test was defined as an increase in ΔSVT4≥10%, and patients were divided into volume response group (Rs group) and non-volume response group (NRs group). ΔSVT3, ΔSVT4 and stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation at T3 and T4 time points were selected, the receiver operating characteristic curve predicting fluid responsiveness was generated, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated.
ResultsForty-one patients were finally enrolled, including 18 cases in Rs group and 23 cases in NRs group. The AUC of ΔSVT3 determining fluid responsiveness was 0.976, with the sensitivity 0.944 and specificity 0.957. The AUC of ΔSVT4 determining fluid responsiveness was 0.971, with sensitivity 0.889 and specificity 0.95. The AUC of stroke volume variation at T3 and T4 in predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.632 and 0.609, respectively. The AUC of pulse pressure variation at T3 and T4 predicting fluid responsiveness was 0.470 and 0.380, respectively.
ConclusionsIndividualized mini-fluid challenge test (2 mg/kg colloidal solution) can accurately determine the fluid responsiveness in the patients undergoing surgery in prone position.
Key words:
Fluid therapy; Prone position; Vascular capacitance
Contributor Information
Yang Xuemei
Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing 400030, China
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
Liu Minyu
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
Fan Xiaojun
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
Xu Shiyuan
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China
Zhang Hongfei
Department of Anesthesiology, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, China