Original Article
Therapeutic value of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancers and precancerous colorectal lesions of different diameters
Hui Su, Haihong Wang, Lili Liu, Tao Cheng, Yuqi He, Peng Jin, Lang Yang, Jianqiu Sheng
Published 2019-05-20
Cite as Chin J Dig Endosc, 2019, 36(5): 339-343. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2019.05.008
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study the differences of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors of different diameters.
MethodsData of 210 cases which were treated with ESD for colorectal tumors at the Endoscopy Center, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from October 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The lesions were divided into two groups according to different diameters (≥4.0 cm group and <4.0 cm group) for comparative analysis of related factors.
ResultsThe mean procedure time of ESD for 210 colorectal tumor cases was 50.3±42.7 min and the mean size of lesions was 7.98±10.84 cm2 . En bloc resection rate was 91.4%, R0 resection rate was 90.5%, and the curative resection rate was 88.6%. Perforation rate was 5.2% (11/210), and the late hemorrhage rate was 0.5% (1/210). Compared with lesions < 4.0 cm, those ≥ 4.0 cm required longer resection time (79.63±53.91 min VS 35.28±24.99 min, P<0.001); and the lesions were mainly located in the rectum (61.97%). LSTs were mainly mixed granular/nongranular type (54.93%); en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate and curative resection rate of the tumors ≥ 4.0 cm were all lower than those of tumors < 4.0 cm. The difference in complete resection rate was statistically significant (85.92% VS 94.24%; P=0.041). The perforation rate (7.04%) was higher in ≥ 4.0 cm group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
ConclusionsESD of colorectal tumors of diameters ≥ 4.0 cm requires longer time with higher operation risk. Additionally, physicians should be more careful with non-rectal lesions.
Key words:
Colorectal cancer; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Tumor diameter; Difference
Contributor Information
Hui Su
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Haihong Wang
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Lili Liu
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Tao Cheng
Department of Pathology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Yuqi He
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Peng Jin
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Lang Yang
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China
Jianqiu Sheng
Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100700, China