PET Dynamic Imaging and Quantification
Evaluation on the feasibility of total-body PET/CT imaging with short acquisition time in lungs and parenchymal organs
Zhao Minjie, Zan Keyu, Cheng Zhaoping, Cui Xiao, Chai Leiying, Li Kun, Ge Min, Duan Yanhua
Published 2022-12-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2022, 42(12): 713-718. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20220714-00228
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of total-body PET/CT imaging with short acquisition time on image quality and lesion detectability in lungs and parenchymal organs.
MethodsSixty patients (31 males, 29 females, age (61.1±11.8) years) with pulmonary nodules (PN) and 53 patients (29 males, 24 females, age (56.7±17.2) years) with parenchymal organ lesions (POL) who underwent total-body PET/CT imaging in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University between October 2021 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The acquisition time with PET was 600 s, and the reconstructed images were divided into 6 groups based on different duration (30, 60, 120, 180, 300 and 600 s), namely G30, G60, G120, G180, G300 and G600 groups. The subjective analysis was carried out with the 5-point Likert scale in 3 aspects: the overall impression of image quality, noise, and lesion conspicuity. The objective analysis indicators included the SUVmean of the mediastinal blood pool (MBP); the SUVmean, standard deviation (SD) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the liver; SUVmax and target-to-background ratio (TBR) of the lesions. Differences of the indicators among 6 groups were analyzed by Friedman test with Bonferroni correction. G600 served as the reference for the other 5 groups to test their lesion detectability.
ResultsThe subjective image quality of different groups for PN and that of G120, G180, G300 groups for POL could meet the needs of clinical diagnosis in terms of the overall image quality, noise, and lesion conspicuity (all scores>3). There was no significant difference in the SUVmean of MBP among different time groups (median for PN: 1.52-1.56, median for POL: 1.35-1.47; χ2 values: 10.23, 11.02, both P>0.05). Difference was not found in SUVmean of the liver either (median for PN: 2.51-2.56, median for POL: 2.33-2.40; χ2 values: 8.35, 8.93, both P>0.05). The liver SD significantly increased along with the shortened acquisition time (χ2 values: 400.99, 400.00, both P<0.001; z values: from -16.90 to -3.15, all P<0.003). The SNR significantly decreased along with the shortened acquisition time (χ2 values: 397.32, 400.00, both P<0.001; z values: 2.98-16.90, all P<0.003). The SUVmax (median for PN: 3.55-4.01, median for POL: 5.77-6.08; χ2 values: 8.58, 3.02, both P>0.05) and TBR (median for PN: 2.42-2.81, median for POL: 2.36-2.45; χ2 values: 9.83, 3.69, both P>0.05) of lesion were not significantly different among 6 groups. Taking G600 group as a reference, the lesion detection rates were 100% in G30 group and other 4 groups for PN (81/81) and in G120, G180, G300 groups for POL (80/80).
ConclusionTotal-body PET/CT imaging with acquisition time of 30 s for lungs and that with acquisition time of 120 s for parenchymal organs are feasible for clinical use, with the PET image quality and lesion detectability maintained.
Key words:
Multiple pulmonary nodules; Image processing, computer-assisted; Time factors; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Contributor Information
Zhao Minjie
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Zan Keyu
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Cheng Zhaoping
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Cui Xiao
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Chai Leiying
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Li Kun
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Ge Min
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
Duan Yanhua
Department of Nuclear Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University &
Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China