Clinical Investigation
Application value of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostatic cancer patients
Liu Wei, Liu Chang, Xu Xiaoping, Song Shaoli
Published 2023-02-25
Cite as Chin J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2023, 43(2): 97-101. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321828-20210804-00264
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the value of 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients with different risk stratifications, and to compare the performance of this modality with conventional imaging in detecting metastases.
MethodsFrom June 2019 to July 2020, the clinical and imaging data of 60 patients (age range: 44-88 years, median age 69 years) who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation of SUVmax in primary foci with prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score (GS). Based on the D′Amico risk stratification (PSA>20 μg/L and ≤20 μg/L, GS>7 and ≤7), the detection rates of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for metastases were evaluated by χ2 test, and the differences of SUVmax were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test. Patients were divided into high-risk (PSA>20 μg/L and GS>7), medium-risk (PSA>20 μg/L and GS≤7, or PSA≤20 μg/L and GS>7), and low-risk (PSA<20 μg/L and GS<7) groups according to PSA levels and GS. Compared with conventional imaging (bone imaging, CT or MRI), the ability of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT to detect metastatic tumors, and the utility to change the prostate cancer stage were evaluated by Fisher′s exact test.
ResultsHigh uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was observed in primary lesions of 60 patients, and SUVmax was positively correlated with GS or PSA (rs values: 0.42, 0.38; P values: 0.001, 0.002). The detection rates of lymph node and bone metastases in the group with PSA>20 μg/L were 11/18 and 13/18, respectively, which were higher than those in the group with PSA≤20 μg/L (28.57%(12/42) and 35.71%(15/42); χ2 values: 6.56, 7.56, P values: 0.010, 0.006. However, there was no statistical significance in the SUVmax of these lesions(z values: -1.04, -0.96; P values: 0.299, 0.337). There was a statistical difference in the detection rates of lymph node and bone metastases between the group with GS>7 and the group with GS≤7 (lymph node: 54.05%(20/37) vs 13.04%(3/23), χ2=10.09, P=0.001; bone metastases: 59.46%(22/37) vs 26.09%(6/23), χ2=8.19, P=0.004), as well as the SUVmax of bone metastases(z=-2.02, P=0.044). In the high-risk group, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT had the higher detection rate of metastases than conventional imaging (16/17 vs 10/17; P=0.039) and it changed 25.0%(15/60) of the patients′ staging.
ConclusionsPSA and GS affect the detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. In patients with high-risk prostate cancer, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging in detecting metastases. When PSA>20 μg/L and GS>7, it is better to use 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer staging.
Key words:
Prostatic neoplasms; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Isotope labeling; Gallium radioisotopes; Positron-emission tomography; Tomography, X-ray computed
Contributor Information
Liu Wei
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
Liu Chang
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
Xu Xiaoping
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China
Song Shaoli
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University
Center for Biomedical Imaging, Fudan University
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Molecular Imaging Probes, Shanghai 200032, China