斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术中交感神经损伤风险的解剖学评估
王洪立
张宇轩
马晓生
夏新雷
吕飞舟
姜建元
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.16.008
Anatomical assessment of the risk of sympathetic nerve injury in oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion
Wang Hongli
Zhang Yuxuan
Ma Xiaosheng
Xia Xinlei
Lyv Feizhou
Jiang Jianyuan
Authors Info & Affiliations
Wang Hongli
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
Zhang Yuxuan
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
Ma Xiaosheng
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
Xia Xinlei
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
Lyv Feizhou
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
Jiang Jianyuan
Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Spine Center Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.16.008
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的基于解剖学研究评估腰椎不同节段进行斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(oblique lumbar interbody fusion,OLIF)中发生交感神经损伤的风险。

方法选择健康成人志愿者24名(男女各12名),采用Siemens磁共振MAGNETOM Verio 3.0 T进行常规腰椎扫描。于L 2,3、L 3,4、L 4,5椎间隙中央层面轴位T2加权像上辨识左侧腰交感干、腹主动脉、左侧腰大肌等解剖结构,测量OLIF手术入路相关解剖学参数和左侧交感干与毗邻结构的解剖学参数。不同性别之间对应参数比较采用成组 t检验;不同节段之间对应参数比较采用最小显著差异(LSD)单因素方差分析。

结果OLIF手术入路相关解剖学参数和左侧交感干与毗邻结构的解剖学参数自L 2,3~L 4,5节段均呈规律性变化。健康成年国人L 2,3~L 4,5左侧腰大肌前缘至腹主动脉的距离男性为(13.65±4.10)mm~(9.42±4.00)mm,女性为(13.89±3.18)mm~(8.38±3.33)mm,均呈明显下降趋势。L 2,3~L 4,5节段左侧交感干至腹主动脉的距离男性为(10.76±3.89)mm~(6.68±3.39)mm,女性为(11.52±3.02)mm~(6.12±2.95)mm,亦均呈明显递减趋势。国人不同节段之间OLIF手术操作范围存在明显差异,L 2,3节段OLIF手术操作空间相对较大,交感神经损伤风险相对较小;左侧腰交感干在L 3,4椎间隙层面走行位置更加偏前、偏内,在OLIF手术过程中存在较大的损伤风险。

结论L 2,3~L 4,5节段左侧交感干位于或紧邻OLIF手术操作通道,OLIF术中存在一定的交感神经损伤风险;但L 2,3、L 3,4、L 4,5不同节段OLIF术中发生交感神经损伤的风险亦有差异。

腰椎;脊柱融合术;交感神经系统;解剖学,局部
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo assess the risk of sympathetic nerve injury in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) in different lumbar spine segments based on anatomical study.

MethodsTwenty-four healthy adult volunteers (12 male and female) were selected and routine lumbar spine scanning was performed with MAG MAGOMOM Verio 3.0 T. The anatomical structures of left lumbar sympathetic trunk, abdominal aorta and left psoas muscle were identified on T2 images of L 2, 3, L 3, 4, L 4, 5 intervertebral space. And the anatomical parameters of the OLIF operation approach and the anatomical parameters of the left sympathetic trunk and adjacent structures were measured. The t-test was used to compare the parameters between the different sexes. The comparison of the data between the different segments was performed by the least significant difference (LSD) single factor analysis of variance.

ResultsFrom the L 2, 3 to L 4, 5 segments, the anatomical parameters of the OLIF operation approach and the anatomical parameters of the left sympathetic trunk and the adjacent structures showed regular changes. The distances between the anterior margin of the left psoas muscle and the abdominal aorta from L 2, 3 to L 4, 5 were 13.65±4.10 mm to 9.42 ± 4.00 mm in adult healthy male individuals, and 13.89±3.18 mm to 8.38 ± 3.33 mm in female individuals, showing a significant downward trend. The distances between the left sympathetic trunk and the abdominal aorta from L 2, 3 to L 4, 5 were 10.76±3.89 mm to 6.68±3.39 mm in adult healthy male individuals, and 11.52±3.02 mm to 6.12±2.95 mm in female individuals, also showing a significant downward trend. There were significant differences in the operation area of OLIF surgery between different segments. The operation area of OLIF surgery was relatively large in L 2, 3 segment, and the risk of sympathetic nerve injury was relatively small. The left lumbar sympathetic trunk in the L 3, 4 intervertebral space was walking front and inside, and there was a greater risk of injury in the OLIF surgery.

ConclusionThe left lumbar sympathetic trunk located in or close to OLIF surgery operation field in L 2-L 5 segments. There was a certain risk of sympathetic nerve injury in OLIF surgery, and the risk of sympathetic nerve injury was different in L 2, 3, L 3, 4, L 4, 5 segments.

Lumbar vertebrae;Spinal fusion;Sympathetic Nervous System;Anatomy, regional
Jiang Jianyuan, E-mail: mocdef.eabnipsnadufyjj
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81472036), the Technology Support Project in Medical Guidance of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (16411964100)
引用本文

王洪立,张宇轩,马晓生,等. 斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术中交感神经损伤风险的解剖学评估[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2017,37(16):1014-1020.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.16.008

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
在Mayer [ 1 ]报告采用微创腹膜后入路进行腰椎椎体间融合的基础上,Silvestre等 [ 2 ]在2012年提出了斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(oblique lateral interbody fusion,OLIF),即经腹膜后腹部血管鞘及腰大肌前缘之间的间隙抵达腰椎间隙进行椎体间融合手术。与极外侧腰椎椎体间融合术(extreme lateral interbody fusion/direct lateral interbody fusion,XLIF/DLIF)相比,OLIF技术可以更好地避开腰丛等神经结构,理论上可以有效地减少腰丛等神经损伤发生率 [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]。随后的临床应用结果证实OLIF技术不仅可以有效降低腰丛损伤的发生率,同时与开放手术相比还具有失血量更少、手术时间和住院时间更短、术后疼痛更轻、恢复更快等一系列优点,受到国内外脊柱外科医生的普遍关注,并在L 2~L 5节段椎间盘源性腰痛、节段不稳、侧后凸畸形、融合后假关节形成等的治疗中得到广泛应用 [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]
随着OLIF技术临床应用的不断增多,越来越多的临床报告显示OLIF技术亦存在一定比例的手术并发症,包括手术部位疼痛、融合器沉降、交感神经损伤、腰丛牵拉损伤等 [ 2 , 6 , 9 , 12 , 13 ]。Li等 [ 12 ]的文献综述分析结果显示OLIF术中和术后并发症发生率分别为1.5%和9.9%。其中交感神经损伤问题引起了部分学者的极大关注,Silvestre等 [ 2 ]报告179例OLIF手术病例中3例(1.7%)患者出现了交感神经损伤相关的下肢症状,在所有手术并发症中位居第二位。Kim等 [ 13 ]对29例涉及L 4,5节段的OLIF病例进行回顾性分析,发现高达13.8%(4例)的患者术后存在交感神经损伤症状。张建锋等 [ 6 ]总结36例单节段OLIF手术的疗效,结果显示交感神经损伤发生率为2.8%。而Hrabalek等 [ 14 ]的相关研究显示交感神经损伤后症状持续时间可以长达53个月;且采用客观检查方法(下肢体表热成像)诊断交感神经损伤发生率明显高于目前临床普遍采用的主观检查诊断方法。故上述文献报道的OLIF术后交感神经损伤发生率可能存在临床诊断偏低的可能。目前对于OLIF术中发生交感神经损伤的确切原因尚未完全清楚,而且对于该并发症目前尚缺少有效的神经电生理检测技术 [ 15 , 16 ]
既往相关解剖学研究显示腰交感干在L 2-3椎间盘水平位于腰大肌内缘起点处,自该节段开始交感干向椎体中央凸出呈弧形向下走行,顶点位于L 3,4节段,其走行位置保持在腰大肌起点位置或附近( 图1[ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]。在L 2~L 5节段OLIF手术中进行椎间隙显露、融合器置入等操作时存在一定的损伤风险。熟悉腰交感干的解剖学走行及毗邻关系对降低或避免OLIF术中腰交感干损伤具有重要价值。但既往研究对腰交感干与腹主动脉、腰大肌等OLIF相关解剖结构的毗邻关系罕有涉及。
腰交感干的解剖示意图A水平面可见腰交感干位于双侧腰大肌前方,紧邻椎体表面B矢状位可见腰交感干在L 2-3椎间盘水平位于腰大肌内缘起点处,自该节段开始交感干向椎体中央凸出呈弧形向下走行,顶点位于L 3,4节段,其走行位置保持在腰大肌起点位置或附近
本研究拟在既往腰椎解剖学和影像学测量的基础上,根据Feigl等 [ 20 ]对腰交感干的观测方法,对一组国人健康志愿者进行腰椎MR检查,并在椎间盘中央层面轴位T2加权像上辨识左侧腰交感干、腹主动脉、左侧腰大肌等解剖结构,目的在于:①测量国人腰椎L 2~L 5节段左侧腰交感干与腹主动脉、左侧腰大肌等毗邻结构的解剖学参数;②分析L 2~L 5不同节段进行OLIF手术操作时发生交感神经损伤的风险;③根据解剖学参数测量结果,尝试总结降低或避免OLIF术中交感神经损伤的预防措施。
参考文献
[1]
Mayer HM . A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997,22(6):691-700.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Silvestre C , Mac-Thiong JM , Hilmi R ,et al. Complications and Morbidities of Mini-open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in 179 Patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012,6(2):89-97. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
McAfee PC , Regan JJ , Geis WP ,et al. Minimally invasive anterior retroperitoneal approach to the lumbar spine. Emphasis on the lateral BAK[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998,23(13):1476-1484.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Ozgur BM , Aryan HE , Pimenta L ,et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine J, 2006,6(4):435-443.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Jin J , Ryu KS , Hur JW ,et al. Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion)[J]. Clin Spine Surg, 2017, 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000474 . DOI:.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
张建锋范顺武方向前,. 斜外侧椎间融合术在单节段腰椎间盘退行性疾病中的应用[J]. 中华骨科杂, 2017,37(2):80-88. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.02.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang JF , Fan SW , Fang XQ ,et al. Clinical value of one-level oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2017,37(2):80-88. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.02.003 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[7]
Phan K , Mobbs RJ . Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Revision of Non-union Following Prior Posterior Surgery: A Case Report[J]. Orthop Surg, 2015,7(4):364-367. DOI: 10.1111/os.12204 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Sato J , Ohtori S , Orita S ,et al. Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017,26(3):6 71-678. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4170-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Mehren C , Mayer HM , Zandanell C ,et al. The Oblique Anterolateral Approach to the Lumbar Spine Provides Access to the Lumbar Spine With Few Early Complications[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016,474(9):2020-2027. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4883-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Fujibayashi S , Hynes RA , Otsuki B ,et al. Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015,40(3):E175-E182. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Ohtori S , Mannoji C , Orita S ,et al. Mini-Open Anterior Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for Degenerated Lumbar Spinal Kyphoscoliosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2015,9(4):565-572. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.4.565 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Li JX , Phan K , Mobbs R . Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Aspects, Operative Outcomes, and Complications[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,98:113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Kim JS , Choi WS , Sung JH . 314 Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion for L4-5: Clinical Outcomes and Perioperative Complications[J]. Neurosurgery, 2016,63Suppl 1:190-191. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000489803.65103.84 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Hrabalek L , Sternbersky J , Adamus M . Risk of sympathectomy after anterior and lateral lumbar interbody fusion procedures[J]. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub, 2015,159(2):318-326. DOI: 10.5507/bp.2013.083 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
刘军辉王燕燕范顺武. 脊柱手术术中神经电生理监护及其操作流程[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2016,36(24):1598-1605. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.24.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liu JH , Wang YY , Fan SW . Electrophysiological monitoring and its operation flow in spinal surgery[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2016,36(24):1598-1605. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.24.011 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[16]
王燕燕刘军辉范顺武,. 腰椎斜外侧融合联合后路椎弓根螺钉内固定术中神经电生理监护模式的探讨及应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2016,36(24):1568-1573. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.24.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang YY , Liu JH , Fan SW ,et al. The study and application of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior transpedicle internal fixation[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2016,36(24):1568-1573. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2016.24.006 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[17]
Gandhi KR , Verma VK , Chavan SK ,et al. The morphology of lumbar sympathetic trunk in humans: a cadaveric study[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2013,72(3):217-222.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Gu Y , Ebraheim NA , Xu R ,et al. Anatomic considerations of the posterolateral lumbar disk region[J]. Orthopedics, 2001,24(1):56-58.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
陈金栋侯树勋彭宝淦,. 人腰椎交感神经解剖学研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2007,87(9):602-605.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chen JD , Hou SX , Peng BG ,et al. Anatomical study of human lumbar spine innervation[J]. Natl Med J China, 2007,87(9):602-605.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[20]
Feigl GC , Kastner M , Ulz H ,et al. The lumbar sympathetic trunk: its visibility and distance to two anatomical landmarks[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2013,35(2):99-106. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1015-y .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Feigl GC , Kastner M , Ulz H ,et al. Topography of the lumbar sympathetic trunk in normal lumbar spines and spines with spondylophytes[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011,106(2):260-265. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeq345 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Banagan K , Gelb D , Poelstra K ,et al. Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2011,36(11):E687-E691. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5911 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
张帆马晓生夏新雷,. 体位改变对腰椎前斜入路通道影响的影像学分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2016,26(4):310-315. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2016.04.05 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang F , Ma XS , Xia XL ,et al. A radiographic evaluation on the effect of body position change on retroperitoneal oblique corridor[J]. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord, 2016,26(4):310-315. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2016.04.05 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[24]
Zhang F , Xu H , Yin B ,et al. Does right lateral decubitus position change retroperitoneal oblique corridor? A radiographic evaluation from L1 to L5[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017,26(3):646-650. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4645-7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Davis TT , Hynes RA , Fung DA ,et al. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014,21(5):785-793. DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Molinares DM , Davis TT , Fung DA . Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 10.3171/2015.3.SPINE13976 . DOI:.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
姜建元,E-mail: mocdef.eabnipsnadufyjj
B
国家自然科学基金面上项目 (81472036)
上海市科委医学引导类科技支撑项目 (16411964100)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号