论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
中西药联合治疗尘肺病37例疗效分析
苏晓珏
范槐芳
王丽
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2017.19.001
Clinical analysis of 37 cases of pneumoconiosis treated with combination of Chinese and western medicine
Su Xiaojue
Fan Huaifang
Wang Li
Authors Info & Affiliations
Su Xiaojue
Department of Respiratory Medicine-Occupation, Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, China
Fan Huaifang
Wang Li
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2017.19.001
168
16
0
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨中药联合西药治疗尘肺病的临床疗效及预后。

方法选取尘肺病患者74例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分成观察组37例和对照组37例,对照组采用常规西药治疗,观察组在对照组基础上联合中药治疗,比较两组治疗前后肺功能指标、临床疗效、体征好转时间以及肺部阴影减少等变化。

结果观察组肺部阴影减少率为75.67%,对照组肺部阴影减少率为62.16%,两组差异有统计学意义( u=2.419, P=0.015)。观察组总有效率为86.49%,对照组总有效率为67.57%,两组差异有统计学意义( u=2.116, P=0.034)。治疗后,观察组肺活量(VC)、用力肺活量(FVC)及第一秒用力呼吸容积(FEV 1)分别为(69.15±18.34)%、(71.08±16.93)%、(68.91±18.75)%,对照组分别为(63.37±20.53)%、(63.13±18.69)%、(55.47±17.58)%,两组均较治疗前显著上升,观察组升高幅度更明显,两组差异均有统计学意义( t=6.778, P=0.000; t=8.836, P=0.000; t=10.133, P=0.000)。观察组喘息、咳嗽、肺部啰音等临床症状体征好转时间均短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义( t=8.220, P=0.000; t=6.836, P=0.000; t=6.909, P=0.000)。

结论中药联合西医治疗尘肺病肺部阴影减少率高,肺功能显著好转,咳嗽、喘息等临床症状体征好转时间缩短,优于常规西药治疗。

尘肺;中草药;药物疗法,联合;治疗结果
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the curative effect and prognosis of traditional Chinese medicine combined with western medicine in the treatment of silicosis patients.

Methods74 patients with silicosis were selected as the research subjects.According to the admission time, the patients were divided into the observation group and the control group, 37 patients in each group.The control group was treated with conventional western medicine, the observation group was given the combined treatment of traditional Chinese medicine and western medicine.The clinical curative effect, pulmonary function index, symptoms improved time and the reduce of lung shadow were observed and compared.

ResultsThe reduction rate of lung shadow in the observation group was 75.67%, which in the control group was 62.16%, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups( u=2.419, P=0.015). The total effective rate of the observation group was 86.49%, which of the control group was 67.57%, there was statistically significant difference between the two groups( u=2.116, P=0.034). After treatment, the vital capacity(VC), forced vital capacity(FVC) and the first second forced expiratory volume(FEV 1) in the observation group were (69.15±18.34)%, (71.08±16.93)%, (68.91±18.75)%, respectively, which in the control group were (63.37±20.53)%, (63.13±18.69)% and (55.47±17.58)%, respectively, which in the two groups were higher than those before treatment, which in the observation group increased significantly, there were statistically significant differences between the two groups( t=6.778, P=0.000, t=8.836, P=0.000, t=10.133, P=0.000). The wheezing, cough, pulmonary rales and other symptoms improved time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant( t=8220, P=0.000, t=6.836, P=0.000, t=6.909, P=0.000).

ConclusionTraditional Chinese medicine combined with western medicine in the treatment of silicosis has higher reduction rate of lung shadow, lung function improved significantly, shorter improved time of cough, wheezing and other symptoms, its curative effect is better than western medicine.

Pneumoconiosis;Drugs, Chinese herbal;Drug therapy, combination;Treatment outcome
Project Supported by Zhejiang Science and Technology Plan of Traditional Chinese Medicine(2016zb097)
引用本文

苏晓珏,范槐芳,王丽. 中西药联合治疗尘肺病37例疗效分析[J]. 中国基层医药,2017,24(19):2881-2884.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2017.19.001

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
尘肺病是由于患者长期在大量二氧化硅粉尘环境中进行生产活动所致的肺纤维化改变为主的疾病。从事采矿、凿岩、爆破、挖掘隧道等生产活动的工人吸入粉尘较多,人体呼吸道又无法完全清除,因此这部分人群尘肺病发病率远高于一般人群,尤其当今社会现代工业迅猛发展,尘肺病发病率越来越高 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]。目前,尘肺病尚无根治药物,一般通过对症治疗和预防并发症等综合措施进行控制,延缓病情进展 [ 4 ]。本研究探讨中药联合西药治疗尘肺病患者的临床效果,现报告如下。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
姚三巧陈志远卢遥尘肺病患者肺泡巨噬细胞死亡受体表达及意义[J]中国职业医学 201340(2):91-94,99. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2013.02.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yao SQ , Chen ZY , Lu Y ,et al. Expression and significance of death receptors in alveolar macrophages of pneumoconiosis patients[J]. Chinese Occupation Medicine, 2013,40(2):91-94, 99. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2013.02.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
包相华孙燕臣李友好某金矿尘肺死亡病例分析[J]中国职业医学 201425(2):233-235. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2014.02.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Bao XH , Sun YC , Li YH ,et al. Analysis of death cases of pneumoconiosis in a gold mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Occupational Medicine, 2014,25(2):233-235. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2014.02.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Liu WW , Wang HX , Yu W ,et al. Treatment of silicosis with hepatocyte growth factor-modified autologous bone marrow stromal cells: a non-randomized study with follow-up[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2015,14(3):10672-10681. DOI: 10.4238/2015.September.9.7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
贾珂君贺咏平王琳琳类风湿性尘肺病一例报告[J]环境与职业医学 201431(11):894-895. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2014.0219 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Jia KJ , He YP , Wang LL ,et al. Report of a case of rheumatoid pneumoconiosis[J]. Environmental and Occupational Medicine, 2014,31(11):894-895. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2014.0219 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
何葆林对新修订《尘肺病诊断标准》的理解和认识[J]卫生职业教育 201028(13):158-159. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1246.2010.13.090 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
He BL . Understanding and understanding of the newly revised diagnostic criteria for pneumoconiosis[J]. Health Vocational Education, 2010,28(13):158-159. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1246.2010.13.090 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
石爱群游宾霍成煤工尘肺并发肺癌淋巴结纤维化对手术的影响[J]中华劳动卫生职业病杂志 201634(5):374-376. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2016.05.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Shi AQ , You B , Huo C ,et al. Impact of coal workers′pneumoconiosis complicated by lymph node fibrosis in lung cancer on surgical treatment[J]. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis, 2016,34(5):374-376. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2016.05.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
阳慧萍蔡艺苹郭锐尘肺病患者肺泡灌洗术前后发音频率变化研究[J]中国职业医学 201340(2):118-119. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2013.02.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang HP , Cai YP , Guo R ,et al. Study on the changes of phonation frequency in patients with pneumoconiosis before and after bronchoalveolar lavage[J]. China Occupational Medicine, 2013,40(2):118-119. DOI: 10.11763/j.issn.2095-2619.2013.02.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
张晓华李颖罗光明尘肺病患者经纤维支气管镜大容量肺灌洗残余量预测模型初探[J]环境与职业医学 201532(7):676-678. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.15122 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang XH , Li Y , Luo GM ,et al. A preliminary study on the prediction model of residual volume of large volume lung lavage in patients with pneumoconiosis[J]. Journal of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, 2015,32(7):676-678. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.15122 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
宋富美李季我国煤矿尘肺病现状及预防对策研究[J]煤矿安全 201445(5):231-233,237. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2014.05.067 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Song FM , Li J . Research on the status and Countermeasures of coal mine pneumoconiosis in China[J]. Coal Mine Safety, 2014,45(5):231-233, 237. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2014.05.067 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
秦克江叶绍色王力珩广西省粉尘作业者职业健康检查尘肺病漏诊分析[J]环境与职业医学 201532(4):347-350. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14162 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Qin KJ , Ye SS , Wang LH ,et al. Analysis of missed diagnosis in Guangxi province occupation health examination of pneumoconiosis in dust exposed workers[J]. Journal of Environmental & Occupational Medicine, 2015,32(4):347-350. DOI: 10.13213/j.cnki.jeom.2015.14162 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
党晓敏胡浩杨岚汉防己甲素对尘肺大鼠自由基损伤的保护作用[J]广东医学 201334(6):838-840. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2013.06.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Dang XM , Hu H , Yang L ,et al. Protective effects of tetrandrine on free radical injury of pneumoconiosis rats[J]. Guangdong Medical Journal, 2013,34(6):838-840. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9448.2013.06.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
邓俊梁宇佳刘春凤老年尘肺病合并肺结核患者抑郁的危险因素及针对性治疗分析[J]河北医药 201638(7):995-997. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2016.07.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Deng J , Liang YJ , Liu CF ,et al. Analysis of risk factors and treatment of depression in elderly patients with pneumoconiosis complicated with pulmonary tuberculosis[J]. Hebei Medical Journal, 2016,38(7):995-997. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2016.07.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
黄永清刘隽陈俊辉中西药联合治疗尘肺患者的疗效观察[J]中国实用医药 20138(1):160-162. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2013.01.127 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Huang YQ , Liu J , Chen JH ,et al. Observation of curative effect of combination of Chinese and Western Medicine on pneumoconiosis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine, 2013,8(1):160-162. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2013.01.127 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
蔡志钢靳伟热毒宁注射液治疗尘肺合并感染临床疗效观察[J]时珍国医国药 201324(8):1965. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2013.08.073 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Cai ZG , Jin W . Observation of Reduning Injection in the treatment of pneumoconiosis complicated with infection clinical curative effect[J]. Lishizhen Medicine Chinese Medicine, 2013,24(8):1965. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2013.08.073 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
B
浙江省中医药科技计划项目 (2016zb097)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号