临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
国产注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和疗效的随机双盲对照研究
杨英麦
梁琪
万新华
王琳
陈苏玲
吴强
张雪平
于生元
商慧芳
胡兴越
卢家红
陶恩祥
聂志余
潘旭东
唐荣华
张宝荣
陈军
谭红愉
董红娟
励建安
罗蔚锋
姚晨
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.05.006
Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A made in China for treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a randomized double-blind controlled trial
Yang Yingmai
Liang Qi
Wan Xinhua
Wang Lin
Chen Suling
Wu Qiang
Zhang Xueping
Yu Shengyuan
Shang Huifang
Hu Xingyue
Lu Jiahong
Tao Enxiang
Nie Zhiyu
Pan Xudong
Tang Ronghua
Zhang Baorong
Chen Jun
Tan Hongyu
Dong Hongjuan
Li Jian′an
Luo Weifeng
Yao Chen
Authors Info & Affiliations
Yang Yingmai
Department of Neurology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
Liang Qi
Wan Xinhua
Wang Lin
Chen Suling
Wu Qiang
Zhang Xueping
Yu Shengyuan
Shang Huifang
Hu Xingyue
Lu Jiahong
Tao Enxiang
Nie Zhiyu
Pan Xudong
Tang Ronghua
Zhang Baorong
Chen Jun
Tan Hongyu
Dong Hongjuan
Li Jian′an
Luo Weifeng
Yao Chen
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.05.006
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的评价国产注射用A型肉毒毒素200 U注射剂量(如合并拇指肌张力障碍的受试者注射240 U)治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和有效性。

方法本研究是一项多中心、分层区组随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照的临床试验,所有受试者(来自2014年9月至2016年2月的15家临床中心)签署知情同意后书后采用分层区组随机法按2∶1比例随机分配到试验组(给予国产注射用A型肉毒毒素200 U或240 U, n=118)和对照组(辅料成分,不含A型肉毒毒素, n=60)。试验分2个阶段:核心试验(1周筛选期、12周双盲治疗期);扩展试验(对核心阶段的两组患者序贯进行开放治疗,观察期6周)。受试者在注射后第1、4、6、8、12、16、18周来院随访,并对患者腕部屈肌、四指屈肌、拇指屈肌进行改良Ashworth量表(Modified Ashworth Scale,MAS)、功能残疾量表、总体评估量表评分。主要疗效指标为试验组和对照组治疗第6周时的MAS评分较基线的变化值。

结果(1)主要疗效指标显示,试验组治疗第6周腕屈肌肌张力MAS评分较基线变化-1.00(-2.00,-1.00)分,对照组较基线变化0.00(-0.50,0.00)分,差异有统计学意义( Z=6.618, P<0.01),试验组疗效优于对照组。(2)安全性结果显示:核心阶段:试验组有10例发生13次不良反应,发生率为8.47%(10/118),对照组有3例发生3次不良反应,发生率为5.00%(3/60),全部为轻到中度不良反应,无重度不良反应发生,试验组与对照组在不良反应发生率上差异无统计学意义。扩展阶段:3例患者发生4次不良反应,发生率为1.95%(3/154),严重程度全为轻度,无重度不良反应发生。

结论国产注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛是安全、有效的。

临床试验注册:药物临床试验登记及信息公示平台,CTR20131191

卒中;上肢;痉挛;A型肉毒毒素
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for injection in the treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity (dosage was 200 U, or 240 U if combined with thumb spasticity).

MethodsThe study was a multi-center, stratified block randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All the qualified subjects were from 15 clinical centers from September 2014 to February 2016. They were randomized (2∶1) to injections of botulinum toxin type A made in China (200-240 U; n=118) or placebo ( n=60) in pivotal phase after informed consent signed. The study was divided into two stages. The pivotal trial phase included a one-week screening, 12-week double-blind treatment, followed by an expanded phase which included six-week open-label treatment. The tone of the wrist, finger, thumb flexors was assessed at baseline and at weeks 0, 1, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 18 using Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), disability in activities of daily living was rated using the Disability Assessment Scale and impaction on pain, muscle tone and deformity was assessed using the Global Assessment Scale. The primary endpoint was the score difference between botulinum toxin type A and placebo groups in the tone of the wrist flexor using MAS at six weeks compared to baseline.

ResultsMuscle tone MAS score in the wrist flexor of botulinum toxin type A and placebo groups at six weeks changed -1.00(-2.00, -1.00) and 0.00(-0.50, 0.00) respectively from baseline. Botulinum toxin type A was significantly superior to placebo for the primary endpoint ( Z=6.618, P<0.01). The safety measurement showed 10 subjects who received botulinum toxin type A had 13 adverse reactions, with an incidence of 8.47% (10/118), and three subjects who received placebo had three adverse reactions, with an incidence of 5.00% (3/60) during the pivotal trial phase. All adverse reactions were mild to moderate, none serious. There was no significant difference in adverse reactions incidence between the botulinum toxin type A and the placebo groups. During the expanded phase three subjects had four adverse reactions and the incidence was 1.95%. All adverse reactions were mild, none serious.

ConclusionBotulinum toxin type A was found to be safe and efficacious for the treatment of post-stroke upper limb spasticity.

Clinical Trial Registration:China Drug Trials, CTR20131191

Stroke;Upper extremity;Spasm;Botulinum toxins, type A
Wan Xinhua, Email: mocdef.3ab61hcmuphxw

None declared

引用本文

杨英麦,梁琪,万新华,等. 国产注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和疗效的随机双盲对照研究[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2018,51(5):355-363.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.05.006

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
痉挛状态是上运动神经元损伤后脊髓反射活动性增高引起的以速度依赖性的牵张反射增强为特征的肌肉张力异常。痉挛肌肉僵硬、紧张,可伴随疼痛,影响患者日常的清洁卫生和活动,并且影响患者的外貌。引起上肢痉挛的病因很多,常见的病因有脑卒中、多发性硬化、脑外伤、脑瘫等,其中以脑卒中多见。脑卒中是常见的神经系统疾病之一,具有高发病率、高致残率的特点。我国脑卒中的发病率为(185~219)/10万,发病率随年龄增高而增加,每年新发脑卒中患者约200万,其中70%~80%的脑卒中患者因为残疾不能独立生活 [ 1 ]。约有69%的脑卒中患者可出现上肢远端痉挛,若不积极治疗可导致痉挛肢体永久性肌张力增高、顽固性疼痛、关节挛缩和运动模式异常,造成中到重度残疾并严重影响患者的日常生活质量。
传统治疗脑卒中后肌肉痉挛的方法包括口服药物、神经阻滞、手术治疗、物理治疗等,但都存在局限性。早在1822年,Justinus Kerner就认识到肉毒毒素引起肌肉麻痹的作用及其在治疗上的潜能 [ 2 ]。1981年Scott [ 3 ]首次报道了肉毒毒素可应用于斜视,1989年A型肉毒毒素首次被用于治疗脑卒中后肢体痉挛,其后国内外多中心、随机双盲对照研究都证实了该疗法治疗脑卒中后肢体痉挛是安全、有效的 [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]。2011年,注射用A型肉毒毒素被评为治疗原发性颅、颈部肌张力障碍(除口下颌肌张力障碍)、书写痉挛的一线治疗药物(A级) [ 9 ]。国产注射用A型肉毒毒素(兰州生物制品研究所有限责任公司生产,出口商品名分别为Lantox/Prosigne/BTXA)自1993年获得新药证书上市以来,主要被应用于肌肉痉挛性疾病的治疗及医学美容。本研究的目的是评价国产注射用A型肉毒毒素治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛的安全性和有效性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
中华医学会神经病学分会中华医学会神经病学分会神经康复学组中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国脑卒中早期康复治疗指南[J]. 中华神经科杂志 2017,50(6):405412. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2017.06.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Erbguth FJ , Naumann M . Historical aspects of botulinum toxin: Justin Kerner (1786-1862) and the"sausage poison"[J]. Neurology 199953(8):18501853.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Scott AB . Botulinum toxin injection of eye muscles to correct strabismus[J]. Trans Am OphthalmolSoc, 1981,79:734770.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Das TK , Park DM . Effect of treatment with botulinum toxin on spasticity[J]. Postgrad Med J, 1989,65(762):208210.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Rosales RL , Chua-Yap AS . Evidence-based systematic review on the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin-A therapy in post-stroke spasticity[J]. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 2008,115(4):617623. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-007-0869-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Rodgers H , Shaw L , Price C ,et al. Study design and methods of the BoTULS trial: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effect and cost effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A[J]. Trials, 2008,9:59. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-59 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Elovic EP , Brashear A , Kaelin D ,et al. Repeated treatments with botulinum toxin type a produce sustained decreases in the limitations associated with focal upper-limb poststroke spasticity for caregivers and patients[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2008,89(5):799806. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.01.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Kaji R , Osako Y , Suyama K ,et al. Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke upper limb spasticity[J]. Curr Med Res Opin, 2010,26(8):19831992. DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2010.497103 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Albanese A , Asmus F , Bhatia KP ,et al. EFNS guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of primary dystonias[J]. Eur J Neurol , 2011,18(1):518. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03042.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
王信义吴逸雯谢青A型肉毒毒素局部注射治疗脑卒中后上肢痉挛[J]内科理论与实践 20138(3):209212.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Brin MF . Botulinumtoxin:chemistry, pharmacology, toxicity, andimmunology[J]Muscle Nerve Suppl, 1997,6S146168.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
万新华,Email: mocdef.3ab61hcmuphxw
B
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号