临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
基于眼表综合分析仪和视觉模拟评分的翼状胬肉术后眼表炎症指数转归
黄海香
袁进
李赛群
张赫男
杨茹惠
邓宇晴
王柏文
彭露露
钟菁
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.09.008
The prognosis of ocular inflammation index after pterygium surgery based on Oculus Keratograph ® 5M and Visual analogue scale
Huang Haixiang
Yuan Jin
Li Saiqun
Zhang Henan
Yang Ruhui
Deng Yuqing
Wang Bowen
Peng Lulu
Zhong Jing
Authors Info & Affiliations
Huang Haixiang
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Guangzhou 510080, China
Yuan Jin
Li Saiqun
Zhang Henan
Yang Ruhui
Deng Yuqing
Wang Bowen
Peng Lulu
Zhong Jing
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.09.008
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的利用眼表综合分析仪和视觉模拟评分探索翼状胬肉切除术后眼表炎症的变化规律,评估其作为抗炎治疗评价指标的有效性。

方法采用前瞻性病例自身对照研究设计,纳入2016年6—9月在中山眼科中心就诊的18例原发性翼状胬肉患者。所有患者均接受翼状胬肉切除联合羊膜移植术,术后给予眼表抗炎治疗。患者术前,术后1、3、7、10、30和60 d进行眼表炎症评估,通过眼表综合分析仪眼红指数分析软件对颞侧球结膜眼红指数(TCHI)进行动态评估,采用眼部症状评分(OSS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)对患者主观炎症状态进行分析,荧光素钠染色观察角膜及巩膜手术创面上皮化进程,并行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压和术后并发症的评价。

结果在随访过程中,未观察到与手术和药物相关的全身和眼部严重并发症。术后10 d,角膜上皮缺损修复完全,术后30 d,巩膜暴露区结膜上皮化完全。术后60 d,BCVA(LogMAR)为0.12±0.17,与术前值0.34±0.36相比明显提高,差异有统计学意义( t=3.401, P=0.003)。术后1 d OSS及VAS均较术前值明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(OSS: Z=-4.255, P=0.000;VAS: Z=-5.256, P=0.000);术后7 d,OSS降至术前基线水平,与术前值比较差异无统计学意义( Z=-0.958, P=0.372);术后30 d,VAS降至术前基线水平,与术前值比较差异无统计学意义( Z=-1.631, P=0.192);术后60 d,OSS低于术前基线水平,与术前值比较差异有统计学意义( Z=-2.397, P=0.037)。术前TCHI均大于1.2,术后1 d TCHI升至峰值,术后1 d TCHI与术前值比较差异有统计学意义( t=-6.620, P=0.000),随着抗炎治疗的介入TCHI逐渐降低,术后7 d TCHI回落至术前基线水平,与术前值比较差异无统计学意义( t=-1.050, P=0.310);术后60 d,TCHI降至基线水平之下,与术前值比较差异有统计学意义( t=2.758, P=0.020)。

结论翼状胬肉围手术期采用主观症状评分联合眼红指数分析可准确评估患者眼表炎症状态,并作为评价抗炎治疗效果的参考指标。

翼状胬肉;眼表炎症;眼红指数;症状评分;视觉模拟评分
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the characteristics of ocular surface inflammation index after pterygium excision by using Oculus Keratograph ® 5M and Visual analogue scale and evaluated the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory treatment.

MethodsA prospective case control study was performed.Eighteen patients (6 males and 12 females) who suffered from primary pterygium were recruited in Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center from June to September 2016.All patients were treated with monocular pterygium excision combined with amniotic membrane transplantation.Anti-inflammatory treatment was given after surgery, and the ocular inflammation index was evaluated at preoperative and 1st, 3rd, 7th, 10th, 30th and 60th day postoperative.The temporal conjunctival hyperemia index (TCHI) was assessed by Oculus Keratograph ® 5M with a red eye index analysis software.Ocular symptom scores (OSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to analyze the subjective symptoms of the patients.Fluorescein staining was used to detect the epithelization of corneal and scleral wound.The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and complications were evaluated in this study.This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center of Sun Yat-sen University (2016KYPJ024). All patients signed informed consent for clinical research.

ResultsNo drug-related ocular and systemic adverse events were found during the follow-up.Corneal epithelial defect was recovered on 10th day, and conjunctival epithelization was observed in sclera exposed area on 30th day.The BCVA on the 60th day was 0.12±0.17, which was significantly lower than 0.34±0.36 preoperatively ( t=3.401, P=0.003). Compared with those before surgery, OSS and VAS were significantly increased on 1st day (OSS: Z=-4.255, P=0.000; VAS: Z=-5.256, P=0.000). The OSS on 7th day was not significantly different from that before surgery ( Z=-0.958, P=0.372). VAS decreased to baseline on 30th day.The OSS on 60th day after surgery was significantly lower than that before surgery ( Z=-2.397, P=0.037). TCHI was higher than 1.2 preoperatively, and increased to the highest on 1st day after surgery, with significant difference between them ( t=-6.620, P=0.000). The TCHI decreased to baseline on 7th day, no significant difference were obtained when compared with preoperative TCHI ( t=-1.050, P=0.310), and TCHI on 60th day after surgery was lower than that before surgery, with significant difference between them ( t=2.758, P=0.020).

ConclusionsThe subjective symptoms combined with conjunctival hyperemia can be more accurate assessment of ocular surface inflammation in the perioperative period of pterygium surgery, which can be used as an evaluation index to assess the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory treatment.

Pterygium;Ocular inflammation;Hyperaemia index;Symptom score;Visual analogue scale
Yuan Jin, Email: mocdef.6ab21aenrocnijnauy
引用本文

黄海香,袁进,李赛群,等. 基于眼表综合分析仪和视觉模拟评分的翼状胬肉术后眼表炎症指数转归[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2018,36(9):693-698.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.09.008

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
翼状胬肉是临床常见的眼表疾病,其具体发病机制尚不明确,大量研究证实翼状胬肉的形成与紫外线过度照射、角膜缘干细胞缺乏、上皮细胞增生凋亡异常、细胞外基质重塑及氧化应激等因素密切相关 [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]。翼状胬肉组织侵入角膜影响患者外观及视功能,切除后联合自体结膜瓣或羊膜移植是其常见的治疗模式 [ 5 ],术后复发率较高,约为3.01%~30.8% [ 6 , 7 ]。有研究报道,翼状胬肉的复发与眼表炎症的活跃程度关系密切 [ 8 ],因此术后的眼表炎症控制成为影响翼状胬肉手术远期成功率的主要影响因素。目前对于眼表炎症的严重程度多通过结膜充血状态进行评估,存在主观误差大、难以标准化等局限性,也限制了术后抗炎药物的规范使用。近年来进入临床的眼表综合分析仪在提供非接触性泪膜评价指标的同时,亦提供了针对结膜充血状态的自动化分级分析眼红指数,较客观地反映眼表炎症状态 [ 9 ]。本研究中拟通过主观症状评分联合眼红指数对翼状胬肉围手术期眼表的炎症状态进行动态评估,追踪翼状胬肉切除术后患者眼表炎症的变化规律,同时评估其作为抗炎药物介入治疗效果指标的有效性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Bradley JC , Yang W , Bradley RH et al. The science of pterygia[J]Br J Ophthalmol 201094(7)∶815-820. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.151852 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Di Girolamo N , Chui J , Coroneo M T et al. Pathogenesis of pterygia:role of cytokines,growth factors,and matrix metalloproteinases[J]Prog Retin Eye Res 200423(2)∶195-228. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-014-2320-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Das P , Gokani A , Bagchi K et al. Limbal epithelial stem-microenvironmental alteration leads to pterygium development[J]Mol Cell Biochem 2015402(1-2)∶123-139. DOI: 10.1007/s11010-014-2320-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Balci M , Sahin S , Mutlu FM et al. Investigation of oxidative stress in pterygium tissue[J]Mol Vis 201117443-447.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Janson BJ , Sikder S Surgical management of pterygium[J]Ocul Surf 201412(2)∶112-119. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2014.01.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Droutsas K , Sekundo W Epidemiology of pterygium.A review[J]Ophthalmologe 2010107(6)∶511-512,514-516. DOI: 10.1007/s00347-009-2101-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
李凤鸣谢立信中华眼科学[M]. 3版.北京人民卫生出版社 20141250.
[8]
Talghini S , Shenasi A Concomitant examination of inflammation and angiogenesis in the pathogenesis of primary moderate pterygium in a well-designed case-control study[J]Pak J Biol Sci 201316(19)∶1046-1050.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Downie LE , Keller PR , Vingrys AJ . Assessing ocular bulbar redness:a comparison of methods[J]Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 201636(2)∶132-139. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12245 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Twelker JD , Bailey IL , Mannis MJ et al. Evaluating pterygium severity:a survey of corneal specialists[J]Cornea 200019(3)∶292-296.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
McCormack HM , Horne DJ , Sheather S Clinical applications of visual analogue scales:a critical review[J]Psychol Med 198818(4)∶1007-1019.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Siak JJ , Ng SL , Seet LF et al. The nuclear-factor kappaB pathway is activated in pterygium[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201152(1)∶230-236. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5735 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Mayer WJ , Mackert MJ , Kranebitter N et al. Distribution of antigen presenting cells in the human cornea:correlation of in vivo confocal microscopy and immunohistochemistry in different pathologic entities [J]Curr Eye Res 201237(11)∶1012-1018. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2012.696172 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
梁庆丰高超梁红活体共聚焦显微镜检查对翼状胬肉活动性评价的应用研究[J]中华眼科杂志 201652(10)∶755-763. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.10.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liang QF , Gao C , Liang H et al. Study on the evaluation of pterygium activity with in vivo confocal microscopy[J]Chin J Ophthalmol 201652(10)∶755-763. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.10.008 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
Wang Y , Zhao F , Zhu W et al. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of morphologic changes and dendritic cell distribution in pterygium [J]Am J Ophthalmol 2010150(5)∶650-655. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.05.025 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Papas EB . Key factors in the subjective and objective assessment of conjunctival erythema[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200041(3)∶687-691.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Leibowitz HM . The red eye[J]N Engl J Med 2000343(5)∶345-351. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200008033430507 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Rodriguez JD , Johnston PR , Ousler GW et al. Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye[J]Clin Ophthalmol 201371197-1204. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S39703 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Murphy PJ , Lau JS , Sim MM et al. How red is a white eye?Clinical grading of normal conjunctival hyperaemia[J]Eye (Lond) 200721(5)∶633-638. DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702295 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Cronin B , Todd B , Lee G The red eye in contact lens wearers—a high risk presentation[J]Aust Fam Physician 200736(10)∶831-832.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Suzuki T Meibomitis-related keratoconjunctivitis:implications and clinical significance of meibomian gland inflammation[J]Cornea 201231Suppl 1S41-44. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31826a04dd .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Terry RL , Schnider CM , Holden BA et al. CCLRU standards for success of daily and extended wear contact lenses[J]Optom Vis Sci 199370(3)∶234-243.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
MacKinven J , McGuinness CL , Pascal E et al. Clinical grading of the upper palpebral conjunctiva of non-contact lens wearers[J]Optom Vis Sci 200178(1)∶13-18.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Pillai RG , Beutelspacher SC , Larkin DF et al. Upregulation of chemokine expression in murine cornea due to mechanical trauma or endotoxin[J]Br J Ophthalmol 200892(2)∶259-264. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.115923 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
陈实玉姜洋余晨颖LASIK术后局部应用溴芬酸钠与糖皮质激素药物的疗效比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201432(3)∶251-256. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.03.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chen SY , Jiang Y , Yu CY et al. Comparison of clinical effects between bromfenac sodium versus glucocorticoid following LASIK[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201432(3)∶251-256. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.03.014 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[26]
Lund I , Lundeberg T , Sandberg L et al. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales:a cross sectional description of pain etiology groups[J/OL]BMC Med Res Methodol 2005531[2017-02-22]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16202149. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-31 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
Sheppard JD , Mansur A , Comstock TL et al. An update on the surgical management of pterygium and the role of loteprednol etabonate ointment[J]Clin Ophthalmol 201481105-1118. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S55259 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Ozgurhan EB , Kara N , Bozkurt E et al. Effect of fluorometholone/tetrahydrozoline fixed combination on conjunctival autograft morphology after primary pterygium excision[J/OL]Biomed Res Int 20132013481843[2017-04-28]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865053. DOI: 10.1155/2013/481843 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
袁进,Email: mocdef.6ab21aenrocnijnauy
B
本研究与所使用的医疗仪器厂商无任何利益关系
C
国家自然科学基金项目 (81670826)
广东省科技计划项目 (2016A020215093)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号