论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
无痛支气管镜检查麻醉方法的初步探讨
袁媛
张杰
岳红丽
王娟
裴迎华
邱小建
王玉玲
王婷
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.02.006
A preliminary study of different methods of anesthesia for painless bronchoscopy
Yuan Yuan
Zhang Jie
Yue Hongli
Wang Juan
Pei Yinghua
Qiu Xiaojian
Wang Yuling
Wang Ting
Authors Info & Affiliations
Yuan Yuan
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Zhang Jie
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Yue Hongli
Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Wang Juan
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Pei Yinghua
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Qiu Xiaojian
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Wang Yuling
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
Wang Ting
Department of Respiratory, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.02.006
1432
351
0
1
11
3
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨实施无痛支气管镜检查可行的麻醉方法。

方法将首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院2018年2月8日至5月4日接受支气管镜检查120例患者按照数字表法随机分为A组(利多卡因组)41例、B组(利多卡因+咪达唑仑+芬太尼组)38例、C组(利多卡因+丙泊酚+舒芬太尼组)41例。记录各组各时点的收缩压、舒张压、心率和血氧饱和度(SpO 2)的变化。通过记录生命体征及不良事件以观察不同麻醉方式的安全性,并于术后用视觉模拟评分(VAS)观察患者对支气管镜检查的耐受度和满意度。

结果C组术中各时点收缩压及舒张压均明显低于A组和B组[A组术中各时点收缩压分别为(149.51±26.40),(150.29±22.09),(147.32±19.62)和(144.54±18.13)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa);B组术中各时点收缩压分别为(137.84±22.85),(144.39±25.09),(144.95±24.04)和(146.79±27.66)mmHg;C组术中各时点收缩压分别为(127.76±23.47),(126.27±20.93),(121.02±23.73)和(119.98±21.58)mmHg;A组术中各时点舒张压分别为(85.44±11.90),(86.22±10.37),(86.10±10.08)和(82.66±8.52)mmHg;B组术中各时点舒张压分别为(76.79±10.68),(79.66±10.43),(79.00±10.32)和(79.79±12.15)mmHg;C组术中各时点舒张压分别为(68.51±10.54),(70.27±10.67),(64.93±9.53)和(66.02±10.68)mmHg],差异有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),C组6例患者出现低血压(收缩压<90 mmHg),其中3例患者需要短暂应用升压药。3组术中SpO 2的差异无统计学意义[A组术中各时点SpO 2分别为(97.12±3.54),(97.07±2.58),(97.51±1.87)和(97.17±2.27)mmHg;B组术中各时点SpO 2分别为(96.55±5.25),(97.13±2.57),(97.66±1.85)和(97.76±2.28)mmHg;C组术中各时点SpO 2分别为(97.85±2.17),(96.32±3.37),(95.80±5.34)和(97.00±2.924)mmHg,均 P>0.05],但C组患者容易出现血氧饱和度下降,18例患者术中出现低氧血症,改善通气后SpO 2可恢复正常。A组和B组患者比C组患者明显感觉到不适( F=36.002, P<0.05),咳嗽明显( F=22.717, P<0.05),更多咽部疼痛( F=8.147, P<0.05),但A组和B组之间术中咳嗽及咽部疼痛程度差异无统计学意义( t值分别为1.432和0.372,均 P>0.05)。C组大多数患者术中完全不知晓( F=1387.043, P<0.05),再次检查的意愿明显高于A组和B组( F=24.826, P<0.05)。

结论丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼更能达到无痛苦的效果,更能提高患者的舒适度和耐受度,更能减少术中记忆,但易发生低氧血症和低血压,术中血氧饱和度下降可以通过建立人工气道予以纠正,血压下降可以短暂应用升压药,相对安全。

支气管镜检查;二异丙酚;舒芬太尼;咪达唑仑;芬太尼;利多卡因
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore a feasible method of anesthesia for painless bronchoscopy.

MethodsA total of 120 patients receiving flexible bronchoscopy in Beijing Tiantan Hospital during the period from February, 8, 2018 to May, 4, 2018, were randomly divided into 3 groups, including group A (using lidocaine for local anesthesia), group B (using lidocaine + midazolam + fentanyl), and group C (using lidocaine + propofol + sufentanil). There were 41 patients in group A, 38 in group B and 41 in group C. The changes in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO 2) in each group were recorded in different points of time. The safety of different methods of anesthesia was observed by recording vital signs and adverse events. Moreover, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to observe the patient′s tolerance and satisfaction of the operation.

ResultsThe intraoperative systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in group C were significantly lower than those in group A and B ( P<0.05). Six cases in group C had hypotension, 3 of whom required vasoactive drugs. The differences of SpO 2 between the 3 groups showed no statistical significance ( P>0.05), while patients in group C were prone to decrease in SpO 2. Eighteen patients in group C had hypoxemia during operation. But after treated with improving ventilation, the SpO 2 of those patients could be restored to normal. Compared with those in group C, patients in group A and group B showed significant discomfort, cough, and more pharyngeal pain ( P<0.05). However, there were no significant differences in the degree of cough and pain between group A and group B ( P>0.05). Most patients in group C had no uncomfortable sensation during the operation ( P<0.05), and the willingness to re-examination was significantly higher than that in group A and group B ( P<0.05).

ConclusionPropofol combined with sufentanil could achieve better painless effect, improve patient comfort and tolerance, and reduce intraoperative memory, but was prone to causing hypoxemia and hypotension. The decline of intraoperative SpO 2 could be corrected by establishing artificial airway, while the decrease of blood pressure could be corrected by applying vasoactive drugs, which were relatively safe.

Bronchoscopy;Propofol;Sufentanil;Midazolam;Fentanyl;Lidocaine
Zhang Jie, Email: mocdef.3ab618126eijgnahz
引用本文

袁媛,张杰,岳红丽,等. 无痛支气管镜检查麻醉方法的初步探讨[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2019,42(2):106-113.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.02.006

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
支气管镜检查是呼吸系统疾病诊断和治疗的重要手段,自20世纪70年代被引入临床后,迅速普及,目前已广泛应用 [ 1 ]。传统的支气管镜检查采用局部黏膜表面麻醉 [ 2 ],该方法简便、经济,但患者在检查中处于清醒状态,当支气管镜进入声门及其以下气道时,由于支气管镜的直接刺激和紧张情绪可导致患者出现一系列不良反应,如恐惧、呛咳、恶心、窒息感,甚至心脑血管意外等,可能导致临床诊疗不彻底;同时也有部分患者由于对支气管镜检查的恐惧,而拒绝再次接受内镜检查,可能延误相关疾病的诊治。因此,在无痛、安全的状态下进行支气管镜检查,是目前临床工作中亟待解决的问题。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Fitz-Henry J . The ASA classification and peri-operative risk[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2011,93(3):185-187. DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2011.93.3.185a .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会支气管镜学组. 纤维支气管镜(可弯曲支气管镜)临床应用指南(草案)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志 200023(3):134DOI: 10.3760/j:issn:1001-0939.2000.03.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Cohen LB , Delegge MH , Aisenberg J ,et al. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation[J]. Gastroenterology, 2007,133(2):675-701. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
中华医学会消化内镜学分会,中华医学会麻醉学分会. 中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉的专家共识意见[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志 201431(8):421-428DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-5232.2014.08.001
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
张杰. 支气管镜操作麻醉方式及无痛支气管镜的相关问题[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志 201538(3):162-163DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.03.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Colt HG , Morris JF . Fiberoptic bronchoscopy without premedication. A retrospective study[J]. Chest, 1990,98(6):1327-1330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.98.6.1327 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Williams TJ , Nicoulet I , Coleman E ,et al. Safety and patient acceptability of intravenous midazolam for fibre optic bronchoscopy[J]. Respir Med, 1994,88(4):305-307. DOI: 10.1016/0954-6111(94)90061-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Putinati S , Ballerin L , Corbetta L ,et al. Patient satisfaction with conscious sedation for bronchoscopy[J]. Chest, 1999,115(5):1437-1440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.115.5.1437
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Du Rand IA , Barber PV , Goldring J ,et al. Summary of the British Thoracic Society guidelines for advanced diagnostic and therapeutic flexible bronchoscopy in adults[J]. Thorax, 2011,66(11):1014-1015. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201052 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
中华医学会呼吸病学分会. 诊断性可弯曲支气管镜应用指南(2008年版)[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志 200831(1):14-17DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0939.2008.01.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Wahidi MM , Jain P , Jantz M ,et al. American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the use of topical anesthesia, analgesia, and sedation during flexible bronchoscopy in adult patients[J]. Chest, 2011,140(5):1342-1350. DOI: 10.1378/chest.10-3361 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Prabhudev AM , Chogtu B , Magazine R . Comparison of midazolam with fentanyl-midazolam combination during flexible bronchoscopy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study[J]. Indian J Pharmacol, 2017,49(4):304-311. DOI: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_683_16 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
雒志明肖汉袁靖. 芬太尼联合咪达唑仑在支气管镜检查中的安全性和有效性分析[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志 201841(1):47-50DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.01.012 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Clark G , Licker M , Younossian AB ,et al. Titrated sedation with propofol or midazolam for flexible bronchoscopy: a randomised trial[J]. Eur Respir J, 2009,34(6):1277-1283. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00142108 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Contoli M , Gnesini G , Artioli D ,et al. Midazolam in flexible bronchoscopy premedication: effects on patient-related and procedure-related outcomes[J]. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol, 2013,20(3):232-240. DOI: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e3182a10b7a .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Goneppanavar U , Magazine R , Periyadka JB ,et al. Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Provides Superior Patient Comfort and Tolerance Compared to Intravenous Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Flexible Bronchoscopy[J]. Pulm Med, 2015,2015: 727 530 . DOI: 10.1155/2015/727530 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Du Rand IA , Blaikley J , Booton R ,et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults: accredited by NICE[J]. Thorax, 2013,68Suppl 1:i1-1i44. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203618 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Yoo MJ , Joffe AM , Meyer TK . Tubeless Total Intravenous Anesthesia Spontaneous Ventilation for Adult Suspension Microlaryngoscopy[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2017,127(1):39. DOI: 10.1177/0003489417744223 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
中华医学会麻醉学分会全凭静脉麻醉专家共识工作小组. 全凭静脉麻醉专家共识[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志 201636(6):641-649DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2016.06.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Grendelmeier P , Kurer G , Pflimlin E ,et al. Feasibility and safety of propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy[J]. Swiss Med Wkly, 2011,141:w13248. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2011.13248 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
郭环穆新林. 支气管镜检查时镇静及镇痛药物的应用[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志 201538(7):537-540. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.07.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
中华医学会麻醉学分会. 右美托咪定临床应用指导意见(2013)[J]. 中华医学杂志 201393(35):2775-2777DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.35.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Gerlach AT , Dasta JF . Dexmedetomidine: an updated review[J]. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 2007,41(2):245. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1H314 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
张杰,Email: mocdef.3ab618126eijgnahz
B
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号