临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
不同年龄视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者玻璃体腔注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂疗效比较
卢颖毅
谷潇雅
喻晓兵
戴虹
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.05.009
Comparative study of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion with different ages
Lu Yingyi
Gu Xiaoya
Yu Xiaobing
Dai Hong
Authors Info & Affiliations
Lu Yingyi
Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Beijing 100730, China
Gu Xiaoya
Yu Xiaobing
Dai Hong
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.05.009
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的对比不同年龄视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)继发黄斑水肿(ME)患者使用地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂(OZURDEX ®)后的临床疗效。

方法回顾性病例观察研究。收集2015年5月至2017年7月在北京医院眼科接受玻璃体腔注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂的CRVO继发ME患者40例40眼的病历资料,分为<40岁组和≥40岁组,每组20例20眼。所有患眼均行最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压及光相干断层扫描(OCT)检查。视力检查采用早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究视力表,采用OCT测量黄斑中心视网膜厚度(CMT),部分患者行荧光素眼底血管造影(FFA)检查。所有患眼均行玻璃体腔注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂治疗,注射后1、2、3、6、9和12个月随访,行视力、眼压及OCT检查。注射后3个月,对于ME复发或疗效不佳者,再次注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂或雷珠单抗。观察并比较患眼注射前后BCVA、眼压以及CMT的变化。

结果2个组患者注射前后不同时间点BCVA、CMT比较,差异均有统计学意义(BCVA: F 分组=2.071, P=0.044; F 时间=9.551, P<0.001.CMT: F 分组=2.402, P=0.034; F 时间=13.175, P<0.001),其中2个组注射后各时间点BCVA均较术前明显提高、CMT均较术前明显变薄,注射后2个月BCVA均较注射后1个月明显提高、CMT均较术前明显变薄,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05);注射后12个月,<40岁组BCVA明显好于≥40岁组,CMT明显薄于≥40岁组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。2个组患者注射后1、2、3个月眼压均较治疗前明显升高,治疗后2个月眼压均较治疗后1个月明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。1年随访期内,<40岁组和≥40岁组平均注射次数分别为(1.8±0.9)次和(2.7±1.4)次,<40岁组注射次数明显较少,差异有统计学意义( t=2.569, P=0.014)。

结论玻璃体腔注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂治疗不同年龄组CRVO继发ME在早期提高视力以及降低CMT方面效果好,注射后1个月即显著改善,注射后2个月疗效最显著。相对于40岁以上患者,40岁以下患者使用地塞米松玻璃体腔内植入剂的长期效果更好,视力提高和CMT下降更明显,总注药次数更少。

地塞米松/治疗应用;视网膜中央静脉阻塞;黄斑水肿
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (OZURDEX ®) in the treatment of macular edema (ME) caused by central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in different ages.

MethodsA retrospective case observation study was performed.Forty eyes of 40 patients diagnosed with ME secondary to CRVO were enrolled in the study.According to patient's age, all of the 40 eyes were divided into <40 years old group (20 eyes) and ≥40 years old group (20 eyes). All eyes went through best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and optic coherence tomography (OCT) examinations.Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart was used to test visual acuity, and central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by OCT.Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) was proceeded selectively.All eyes went through intravitreal injections of intravitreal dexamethasone implant and BCVA, IOP, OCT were tested 1 month, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after injection.After 3 months follow-up, intravitreal dexamethasone implant or ranibizumab would be injected again for patients with ME recurrence or poor treatment effects.Changes of BCVA, IOP and CMT before and after injection were observed.

ResultsBCVA and CMT in the <40 years old group and ≥40 years old group were compared at different time points, and the differences were significantly different (BCVA: F group=2.071, P=0.044; F time=9.551, P<0.001.CMT: F group=2.402, P=0.034; F time=13.175, P<0.001), compared with before injection, the BCVA at each time point of post-injection was improved, and CMT was thinner than that before injection; at 2 months after injection, the BCVA was improved and CMT was thinner than those 1 month after injection, the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05); at 12 months after injection, the BCVA in the <40 years old group was obviously better than that in the ≥40 years old group, the CMT was much thinner than that in the ≥40 years old group, the differences were statistically significant (both at P<0.05). Compared with before injection, the IOP at 1 month, 2 and 3 months after injection was increased, the IOP at 2 months after injection was higher than that at 1 month after injection, the differences were statistically significant (both at P<0.05). The mean number of injections was (1.8±0.9) times in the <40 years old group and (2.7±1.4)times in the ≥40 years old group, with a statistical difference between them ( t=2.569, P=0.014).

ConclusionsIn different age groups, patients with ME caused by CRVO can be effectively treated by intravitreal dexamethasone implant, the therapeutic effect is significant at 1 month post-injection and most improvement is shown at 2 months post-injection.Compared with patients over 40 years of age, patients under 40 years of age have better long-term results, better visual improvement, thinner CMT and less intravitreal injections.

Dexamethasone/therapeutic use;Central retinal vein occlusion;Macular edema
Dai Hong, Email: tendef.3ab62xgnoh-iad
引用本文

卢颖毅,谷潇雅,喻晓兵,等. 不同年龄视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿患者玻璃体腔注射地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂疗效比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2019,37(5):363-368.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.05.009

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
视网膜静脉阻塞(retinal vein occulusion,RVO)包括视网膜中央静脉阻塞(central retinal vein occlusion,CRVO)和视网膜分支静脉阻塞,是仅次于糖尿病视网膜病变导致视力丧失的第二大常见视网膜血管疾病,其继发的黄斑水肿(macular edema,ME)是引起视功能障碍的主要原因 [ 1 , 2 ]。ME的发生和发展过程中,炎性因子和多种细胞因子起到关键作用,因此,抗炎是ME治疗中的重要环节。自2009年美国FDA批准地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂(OZURDEX ®,美国艾尔建公司)应用于临床以来,众多指南推荐抗VEGF药物和糖皮质激素(主要指OZURDEX ®)是RVO-ME的治疗方案。2017年中国药品监督管理局(SFDA)批注OZURDEX ®(商品名:傲迪适,美国艾尔建公司)用于治疗RVO引起的ME。在国内的Ⅲ期临床试验和临床实践中观察,地塞米松玻璃体腔内植入剂在RVO-ME患者中可提高视力,黄斑厚度变薄,同时具有较好的安全性 [ 3 ]。尽管CRVO病因复杂,但一般认为年青人的发病与炎性病变相关,老年人则多以血管本身病变为主 [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ],然而针对不同年龄段CRVO-ME患者的推荐治疗方案并无区别 [ 10 , 11 ]。目前鲜见不同年龄CRVO继发性ME采用地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂的疗效比较。本研究中对地塞米松玻璃体内植入剂治疗不同年龄段CRVO-ME患者进行总结,观察并比较其对不同年龄段患者的治疗效果和安全性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Laouri M Chen E Looman M et al. The burden of disease of retinal vein occlusion:review of the literature[J]Eye (Lond) 201125(8)∶981-988. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.92 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
刘伟伟徐亮谢熹玮北京城乡人群视网膜静脉阻塞患病情况调查[J]眼科 200716(4)∶233-236.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Liu WW Xu L Xie XW et al. Epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion in adult Chinese populations in rural and urban areas in Beijing[J]Ophthalmol CHN 200716(4)∶233-236.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
Li X Wang N Liang X et al. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Chinese patients:randomized,sham-controlled,multicenter study[J]Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018256(1)∶59-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-017-3831-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Lindsell LB Lai MM Fine HF . Current concepts in managing retinal vein occlusion in young patients[J]Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 201546(7)∶695-701. DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20150730-02 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
徐冰董宁肖林中青年人视网膜中央静脉阻塞危险因素分析[J]北京医学 201234(8)∶759-761.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu B Dong N Xiao L et al. Risk factors for central retinal vein occlusion in young Chinese people[J]Beijing Med J 201234(8)∶759-761.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
金庆新王雁王春梅中青年视网膜静脉阻塞临床分析[J]国际眼科杂志 20088(6)∶1254-1255.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Jin QX Wang Y Wang CM et al. Clinical analysis of retinal vein occlusion in the young and middle-aged people[J]Int J Ophthalmol 20088(6)∶1254-1255.
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[7]
周龙芳杨红不同年龄和类型视网膜静脉阻塞患者血同型半胱氨酸水平检测[J]中华眼底病杂志 201632(4)∶391-394. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.04.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhou LF Yang H Serum homocysteine levels of retinal vein occlusion patients with different ages and types[J]Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis 201632(4)∶391-394. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2016.04.011 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[8]
Lee WJ Kang MH Seong M et al. Comparison of aqueous concentrations of angiogenic and inflammatory cytokines in diabetic macular oedema and macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion[J]Br J Ophthalmol 201296(11)∶1426-1430. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301913 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Noma H Mimura T Shimada K Role of inflammation in previously untreated macular edema with branch retinal vein occlusion[J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 20141467[2018-10-13]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4032564/. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-67 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
徐娜高荣玉徐鑫彦玻璃体腔注射康柏西普对视网膜分支静脉阻塞引发的不同类型黄斑水肿的疗效[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201836(8)∶619-624. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.08.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu N Gao RY Xu XY et al. The efficacy of intravitreal injection of conbercept on different types of macular edema induced by branch retinal vein occlusion[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201836(8)∶619-624. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.08.010 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[11]
马锋伟杜翠云程美红康柏西普与曲安奈德玻璃体腔注射治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿临床疗效的比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201634(9)∶837-841. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.09.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Ma FW Du CY Cheng MH et al. A comparative study on conbercept and triamcinolone acetoinde intravitreal injection for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201634(9)∶837-841. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.09.013 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[12]
Haller JA Bandello F Belfort R et al. Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema related to branch or central retinal vein occlusion twelve-month study results[J]Ophthalmology 2011118(12)∶2453-2460. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Haller JA Bandello F Belfort R et al. Randomized,sham-controlled trial of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion[J]Ophthalmology 2010117(6)∶1134-1146. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
黎晓新王宁利梁小玲地塞米松玻璃体腔植入剂治疗中国患者视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的安全性和有效性:随机、假注射对照、多中心研究[J]中华眼底病杂志 201834(3)∶212-220. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2018.03.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li XX Wang NL Liang XL et al. Safety and efficacy of dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusionin Chinese patients:randomized,sham-controlled,multicenter study[J]Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis 201834(3)∶212-220. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2018.03.003 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
Scott IU vanVeldhuisen PC Ip MS et al. Baseline factors associated with 6-month visual acuity and retinal thickness outcomes in patients with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion or hemiretinal vein occlusion:SCORE2 Study Report 4[J]JAMA Ophthalmol 2017135(6)∶639-649. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.1141 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Kim SJ Yoon YH Kim HK et al. Baseline predictors of visual acuity and retinal thickness in patients with retinal vein occlusion[J]J Korean Med Sci 201530(4)∶475-482. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.475 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
谷潇雅戴虹喻晓兵地塞米松玻璃体腔植入剂治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿一年临床观察[J]中华眼底病杂志 201834(3)∶221-227. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2018.03.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Gu XY Dai H Yu XB . One year clinical observation of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex) in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion[J]Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis 201834(3)∶221-227. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1015.2018.03.004 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A
戴虹,Email: tendef.3ab62xgnoh-iad
B
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号