论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
中文版生命体征监测态度量表的汉化及信效度检验
郑丹萍
申彦雅
刘鑫
王晓晶
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.08.008
Reliability and validity of Chinese version of attitudes towards vital signs monitoring scale
Zheng Danping
Shen Yanya
Liu Xin
Wang Xiaojing
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zheng Danping
International Medical Service, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China
Shen Yanya
Liu Xin
Wang Xiaojing
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.08.008
571
119
0
0
2
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的汉化生命体征监测态度量表(V-scale),并对其进行信度和效度检验。

方法经过翻译、回译和文化调适,确定中文版问卷的条目,采用中文版V-scale对2018年3—8月北京3所三级甲等综合医院普通病房工作的420名护士进行现况调查,通过探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、内部一致性检验等方法评价其信效度。

结果中文版V-scale量表共有16个条目,量表内容效度为0.93,经探索性因子分析提取出5个公因子(工作量、操作技能、沟通、关键指标、知识),累计方差贡献率为65.724%。验证性因素分析结果显示量表的各项拟合指标良好,各适配检验值均达到了标准水平。总量表Cronbach's α系数为0.761,各维度的Cronbach's α系数为0.579~0.809;量表重测信度为0.778。

结论中文版V-scale量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于评价我国病房护士就生命体征监测对于识别病情恶化的态度。

护士;生命体征;态度;信度;效度;量表汉化;生命体征监测态度量表
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo translate the attitudes towards vital signs monitoring scale (V-scale) and to test the reliability and validity of it.

MethodsWe carried out translation, back-translation and culture adaptation to confirm the Chinese version scale. From March to August 2018, we investigated 420 nurses of general wards from three Class Ⅲ Grade A general hospitals in Beijing with the Chinese version of V-scale. The reliability and validity of the scale was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency test.

ResultsThe Chinese version of V-scale had 16 items with 0.93 for the content validity. A total of 5 common factors (workload, operation skill, communication, key indicators and knowledge) were extracted by exploratory factor analysis with 65.724% for the total variance contribution. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale was with the good level of fit indices in each item, and adaptation test values all reached the standard level. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.761 and Cronbach's α coefficients of all dimensions ranged from 0.579 to 0.809. The retest reliability of the scale was 0.778.

ConclusionsThe Chinese version of V-scale has the good reliability and validity which could be used to assess ward nurses' attitudes towards vital signs monitoring to identify disease progression in China.

Nurses;Vital signs;Attitude;Reliability;Validity;Scale chinesization;Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring scale
Wang Xiaojing, Email: nc.defhcabmupgnijoaixgnaw
引用本文

郑丹萍,申彦雅,刘鑫,等. 中文版生命体征监测态度量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(8):956-961.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.08.008

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
住院患者在出现病情恶化前的数小时常常会伴有生命体征的改变 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ],病房护士往往是此变化的第一目击者,护士对于生命体征变化的早期识别、记录及汇报直接影响患者病情变化的转归,而研究显示66%的住院患者在心跳骤停前8 h经历严重的生命体征变化,但这些改变几乎没有被护士识别或记录 [ 4 ]。68%的住院患者在心跳骤停前6 h出现异常的症状和体征,仅有25%患者的病情变化通知了医生 [ 5 , 6 ]。护士对于生命体征变化警觉性缺失、未及时记录及汇报患者生命体征的变化,可增加临床不良事件发生,包括病死率、非计划转入重症监护室和心肺停搏等。一项对于经历抢救的病房护士的访谈显示病情恶化前护士对于生命体征监测的态度严重影响护士识别、解释、汇报病情变化的效率 [ 3 , 7 ],而此态度与护士对于生命体征的感知、理解、预测、工作负荷及团体之间的信任和合作水平相关 [ 3 , 8 ],干预研究显示当护士对于生命体征恶化的警觉性提高时,可明显降低临床不良事件的发生 [ 9 , 10 ]。因此,有效评估病房护士就生命体征监测对于识别患者病情变化的态度并在循证基础上开展针对性的培训,提高护士对于生命体征恶化的警觉性,这对保障护理安全及提高服务质量非常重要 [ 11 ]。2015年新加坡学者应用护理角色有效性模型框架在循证基础上研制了病房护士生命体征监测态度量表(attitudes towards vital signs monitoring scale,V-scale),主要用于评价护士对于生命体征监测在识别、解释、汇报患者病情恶化的态度,信效度高 [ 12 ]。但我国目前尚缺乏针对病房护士生命体征监测的态度的量化评估。本研究旨在对V-scale量表进行汉化,并评价其在病房护士就生命体征监测对于识别患者病情恶化的态度。现报道如下。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Buist MD Jarmolowski E Burton PR et al. Recognising clinical instability in hospital patients before cardiac arrest or unplanned admission to intensive care. A pilot study in a tertiary-care hospital[J]. Med J Aust 19991711):22-25.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
DeVita MA Smith GB Adam SK et al. "Identifying the hospitalised patient in crisis"--a consensus conference on the afferent limb of rapid response systems[J]. Resuscitation 2010814):375-382. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.12.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Shearer B Marshall S Buist MD et al. What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service[J]. BMJ Qual Saf 2012217):569-575. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Schein RM Hazday N Pena M et al. Clinical antecedents to in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest[J]. Chest 1990986):1388-1392. DOI: 10.1378/chest.98.6.1388 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Odell M . Detection and management of the deteriorating ward patient:an evaluation of nursing practice[J]. J Clin Nurs 2015241-2):173-182. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12655 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Franklin C Mathew J . Developing strategies to prevent inhospital cardiac arrest:analyzing responses of physicians and nurses in the hours before the event[J]. Crit Care Med 1994222):244-247. DOI: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90096-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Chua WL Mackey S Ng EK et al. Front line nurses' experiences with deteriorating ward patients:a qualitative study[J]. Int Nurs Rev 2013604):501-509. DOI: 10.1111/inr.12061 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Mok WQ Wang W Liaw SY . Vital signs monitoring to detect patient deterioration:an integrative literature review[J]. Int J Nurs Pract 201521Suppl 2):91-98. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12329 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Tume LN Sefton G Arrowsmith P . Teaching paediatric ward teams to recognise and manage the deteriorating child[J]. Nurs Crit Care 2014194):196-203. DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12050 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Saab MM McCarthy B Andrews T et al. The effect of adult Early Warning Systems education on nurses' knowledge,confidence and clinical performance:a systematic review[J]. J Adv Nurs 20177311):2506-2521. DOI: 10.1111/jan.13322 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Liaw SY Wong LF Ang SB et al. Strengthening the afferent limb of rapid response systems:an educational intervention using web-based learning for early recognition and responding to deteriorating patients[J]. BMJ Qual Saf 2016256):448-456. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004073 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Mok W Wang W Cooper S et al. Attitudes towards vital signs monitoring in the detection of clinical deterioration:scale development and survey of ward nurses[J]. Int J Qual Health Care 2015273):207-213. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Ertuğ N . Evaluating the validity and reliability of the V-scale instrument (Turkish version)used to determine nurses' attitudes towards vital sign monitoring[J]. Int J Nurs Pract 2018243):e12637. DOI: 10.1111/ijn.12637 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
郭金玉李峥. 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志 2012473):283-285. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2012.03.039 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
史静琤莫显昆孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版) 2012372):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
罗烨姚水洪余国峰. 道德困扰问卷的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中国实用护理杂志 20173334):2704-2708. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.34.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
吴明隆. 结构方程模型[M]. 2版. 重庆重庆大学出版社 2010.
[18]
匡亚辉. 中文版慢性中耳炎评估量表信、效度检测研究[D]. 苏州苏州大学 2016.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
秦浩陈景武. 医学量表条目的筛选考评方法及其应用[J]. 中国行为医学科学 20064):375-376. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2006.04.039 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
刘宇李峥. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京人民卫生出版社 2012.
[21]
陈正昌. SPSS与统计分析[M]. 北京教育科学出版社 2015.
[22]
张莉何利孟珊珊. 中文版制动舒适度问卷在膝关节置换术后患者中应用的信效度分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志 2018246):647-651. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.06.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
周玲. 慢性疼痛患者整体疼痛评估量表的汉化及信效度评价[D]. 杭州浙江大学 2014.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
张绍果赵浚竹杨辉. 非急诊科护士临床急救能力测评问卷的信效度检验[J]. 中华现代护理杂志 2017238):1136-1139. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2017.08.025 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Padilla RM Mayo AM . Clinical deterioration:a concept analysis[J]. J Clin Nurs 2018277-8):1360-1368. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14238 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
王晓晶,Email: nc.defhcabmupgnijoaixgnaw
B

郑丹萍,申彦雅,刘鑫,等.中文版生命体征监测态度量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].中华现代护理杂志,2019,25(8):956-961. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2019.08.008.

C

试验构思与设计为郑丹萍、王晓晶;研究准备、研究实施为刘鑫;资料收集、数据整理为申彦雅;数据分析、论文撰写为郑丹萍、申彦雅;绘制图表为刘鑫;论文修订为郑丹萍;王晓晶审校

D
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号