醛固酮增多症的诊断
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
不同方法检测血醛固酮浓度的一致性比较
郑枫凡
宋颖
杨淑敏
胡金波
何文雯
汪志红
程庆丰
李启富
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2019.11.003
On the consistency of different methods for detecting aldosterone concentration in blood
Zheng Fengfan
Song Ying
Yang Shumin
Hu Jinbo
He Wenwen
Wang Zhihong
Cheng Qingfeng
Li Qifu
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zheng Fengfan
Department of Endocrinology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, The Chongqing Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Major Metabolic Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China
Song Ying
Yang Shumin
Hu Jinbo
He Wenwen
Wang Zhihong
Cheng Qingfeng
Li Qifu
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2019.11.003
1879
577
0
0
3
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的比较化学发光法、放射免疫法与高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(质谱法)测定血醛固酮浓度的一致性;建立质谱法测定健康成人立位血醛固酮浓度参考值范围。

方法化学发光法(进口、国产A、国产B 3种检测系统)、放射免疫法、质谱法检测138名健康成人、67例原发性高血压患者和23例原发性醛固酮增多症患者血醛固酮浓度。

结果不同方法测定的血醛固酮浓度存在明显差异( P<0.01)。质谱法与化学发光法(进口、国产A)测定血醛固酮浓度呈正相关( r=0.776, P<0.01; r=0.805, P<0.01);与化学发光法(国产B)测定血醛固酮浓度无显著相关性( r=0.058, P>0.05);与放射免疫法测定血醛固酮浓度呈低度相关( r=0.338, P<0.01)。Bland-Altman分析示3种方法检测血醛固酮浓度不具有一致性。以 P2.5~ P97.5建立的质谱法测定成人立位血醛固酮浓度参考值范围为15.2~222.2 pg/ml。

结论不同方法测定的血醛固酮浓度一致性较差,测定值间不能直接相互替换;临床上使用不同检测方法可能需要采用不同参考值范围。

醛固酮;高效液相-患联质谱法;化学发光法;放射免疫法
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the consistency of different methods for detecting aldosterone concentration in blood and to establish a reference interval of serum aldosterone concentration by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry(LC-MS/MS).

MethodsConcentrations of blood aldosterone were measured by LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescent assays (Diasorin, Domestic A and B systems) and radioimmunoassay (RIA) in 138 healthy adults, 67 patients with essential hypertension and 23 patients with primary aldosteronism.

ResultsAldosterone concentrations measured by various methods were quiet different( P<0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient were 0.776( P<0.01) between CLIA (Diasorin) and LC-MS/MS, 0.805( P<0.01) between CLIA (Domestic A) and LC-MS/MS, 0.058( P>0.05) between CLIA(Domestic B) and LC-MS/MS, 0.338( P<0.01) as well as between RIA and LC-MS/MS. Bland-Altman analysis for the measurements showed poor consistency among methods for aldosterone concentrations. The reference interval was 15.2-222.2 pg/ml for serum aldosterone concentrations by LC-MS/MS.

ConclusionsThere are significant differences of blood aldosterone concentrations determined by different methods. Clinically, a specified reference interval might be needed while using different methods.

Aldosterone;Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry;Chemiluminescent assays;Radioimmunoassay
Li Qifu, Email: tendef.habaeyufiqil
引用本文

郑枫凡,宋颖,杨淑敏,等. 不同方法检测血醛固酮浓度的一致性比较[J]. 中华内分泌代谢杂志,2019,35(11):934-938.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2019.11.003

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
醛固酮是肾上腺皮质球状带分泌的一种类固醇激素,其主要作用于肾脏,具有保钠排钾的作用。血中醛固酮浓度是原发性醛固酮增多症(原醛)、先天性肾上腺皮质增生、Liddle综合征等疾病筛查及诊断的重要指标。血醛固酮增高也是心脑血管事件、慢性肾脏病、代谢综合征的危险因素 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]。因此准确地检测血醛固酮浓度具有重要的临床意义。目前醛固酮浓度检测方法主要有放射免疫法、化学发光法、质谱法。质谱法以其灵敏度高、特异性高、可重复性强等优势,成为醛固酮浓度测定的"金标准" [ 4 ],但因其成本及检验技术要求较高,临床开展受限 [ 5 , 6 ],故目前临床常用的检测方法为放射免疫法和化学发光法。然而,鲜有将其与质谱法比较,并验证其准确性的研究报道。此外,目前尚无基于我国人群建立的质谱法测定血醛固酮浓度的参考值范围。故本研究旨在比较不同方法测定血醛固酮浓度的一致性,并建立质谱法测定成人立位血醛固酮浓度的参考值范围。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Mulatero P , Monticone S , Bertello C ,et al. Long-term cardio- and cerebrovascular events in patients with primary aldosteronism[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 201398(12):4826-4833. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-2805 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Chen W , Li F , He C ,et al. Elevated prevalence of abnormal glucose metabolism in patients with primary aldosteronism: a meta-analysis[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2014183(2):283-291. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-013-1007-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Rossi GP , Bernini G , Desideri G ,et al. Renal damage in primary aldosteronism: results of the PAPY Study[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 20079(2):87-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-007-0016-4
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Funder JW , Carey RM , Fardella C ,et al. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 200893(9):3266-3281. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-0104 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Funder JW , Carey RM , Mantero F ,et al. The Management of Primary Aldosteronism: Case Detection, Diagnosis, and Treatment: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2016101(5):1889-1916. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2015-4061 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Juutilainen A , Savolainen K , Romppanen J ,et al. Combination of LC-MS/MS aldosterone and automated direct renin in screening for primary aldosteronism[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2014433209-215. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.03.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
中国高血压防治指南修订委员会. 中国高血压防治指南2010[J]. 中华心血管病杂志 201139(7):579-616. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2011.07.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Tuhan HU , Catli G , Anik A ,et al. Cross-reactivity of adrenal steroids with aldosterone may prevent the accurate diagnosis of congenital adrenal hyperplasia[J]. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab, 201528(5-6):701-704. DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2014-0170 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Pizzolo F , Corgnati A , Guarini P ,et al. Plasma aldosterone assays: comparison between chemiluminescence-based and RIA methods[J]. Clin Chem, 200652(7):1431-1432. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.061184 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Ray JA , Kushnir MM , Palmer J ,et al. Enhancement of specificity of aldosterone measurement in human serum and plasma using 2D-LC-MS/MS and comparison with commercial immunoassays[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2014970102-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.08.042 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Baron S , Amar L , Faucon AL ,et al. Criteria for diagnosing primary aldosteronism on the basis of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determinations of plasma aldosterone concentration[J]. J Hypertens, 201836(7):1592-1601. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001735 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Hinchliffe E , Carter S , Owen LJ ,et al. Quantitation of aldosterone in human plasma by ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2013913-91419-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.11.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Taylor PJ , Cooper DP , Gordon RD ,et al. Measurement of aldosterone in human plasma by semiautomated HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry[J]. Clin Chem, 200955(6):1155-1162. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.116004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Meunier C , Blondelle D , Faure P ,et al. Development and validation of a method using supported liquid extraction for aldosterone determination in human plasma by LC-MS/MS[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 20154478-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.05.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
李启富,Email: tendef.habaeyufiqil
B

郑枫凡、宋颖、杨淑敏、胡金波、何文雯、汪志红、程庆丰、李启富:实验操作、论文撰写、数据整理、统计学分析、研究指导、论文修改、经费支持

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
国家自然科学基金 (81800701)
重庆市社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项子课题 (cstc2016shms-ztzx1003)
重庆市科卫联合医学科研项目 (2018QNXM001)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号