论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
颅内结核核磁共振影像分型与患者预后的关系
李多
吕岩
王岳
马大庆
侯代伦
吕平欣
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.01.008
The association of magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognosis of patients with intracranial tuberculosis
Li Duo
Lyu Yan
Wang Yue
Ma Daqing
Hou Dailun
Lyu Pingxin
Authors Info & Affiliations
Li Duo
Department of Radiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Capital University, Beijing 101149, China
Lyu Yan
Department of Radiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Capital University, Beijing 101149, China
Wang Yue
Department of Radiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Capital University, Beijing 101149, China
Ma Daqing
Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing Capital University, Beijing 100050, China
Hou Dailun
Department of Radiology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Beijing Capital University, Beijing 101149, China
Lyu Pingxin
Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute, Beijing 101149, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.01.008
1057
338
0
0
2
1
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的分析颅内结核核磁共振影像表现与患者预后的关系。

方法回顾性分析2012年1月1日至2016年12月31日本院收治的420例颅内结核患者的MRI资料并随访患者的预后。420例颅内结核患者中,男220例,女200例,年龄8~83岁,中位年龄28.5岁。根据MRI影像表现分型,420例中脑膜结核93例,脑实质结核192例,混合型颅内结核82例。头颅MRI无异常31例,表现为小片状脑白质脱髓鞘改变22例。本研究结果的计量资料采用单因素方差分析,2组间比较采用 t检验;计数资料采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验,采用logistic回归分析方法分析预后相关因素。

结果脑膜结核的MRI表现为脑膜渗出增厚强化,继发性改变包括脑积水、脑血管炎、脑梗死和颅神经受累。脑实质结核包括脑实质结核瘤、结核脓肿和结核性脑炎,脑实质结核瘤表现为实性结节影,在T 1WI为等或稍低信号,在T 2WI上为高信号,中心出现干酪坏死后表现为T 2WI低信号,干酪坏死液化时在T 2WI为高信号,增强扫描无干酪坏死时表现为均匀强化结节,伴干酪坏死时为环形强化结节;结核脓肿表现为环形强化的脓肿壁伴扩散受限加重的脓液;结核性脑炎表现为脑回样T 2WI高信号,T 1WI低信号,增强扫描可见不均匀强化。混合型颅内结核同时具有脑膜结核和脑实质结核的影像学表现。脑膜结核型入院及出院时的Barthel评分分别为(53±30)和(61±28)分,脑实质结核型分别为(77±29)和(81±26)分,混合型颅内结核分别为(58±29)和(66±28)分,脑膜结核型及混合型颅内结核入院及出院时的Barthel评分均明显低于脑实质结核型( P<0.001)。近期(出院时)预后不良(Barthel评分≤60分)的患者151例,远期(随访至少12个月)预后不良的患者71例中死亡35例,遗留功能障碍者36例。脑膜结核型近期预后不良的患者占50.5%(47/93),远期预后不良的患者占25.8%(24/93),病死率为15.1%(14/93);脑实质结核型近期预后不良的患者占23.4%(45/192),远期预后不良的患者占12.5%(24/192),病死率为5.7%(11/192);混合型颅内结核近期预后不良的患者占47.6%(39/82),远期预后不良的患者占20.7%(17/82),病死率为7.3%(6/82)。脑膜结核型及混合型颅内结核患者近期预后及远期预后不良的发生率均高于脑实质结核型(均 P<0.001),脑膜结核型的病死率明显高于脑实质结核型( P=0.009)。环池脑膜受累82例,脑积水59例,脑梗死45例,多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,环池脑膜受累( OR=2.339,95 %CI为1.355~4.037, P=0.002)、脑积水( OR=3.896,95 %CI为2.077~7.308, P<0.001)、脑梗死( OR=3.282,95 %CI为1.615~6.670, P=0.001)是近期预后不良的独立危险因素;脑积水( OR=4.458,95 %CI为2.341~8.492, P<0.001)和脑梗死( OR=2.456,95% CI为1.179~5.114, P=0.016)是远期预后不良的独立危险因素。

结论颅内结核影像学分型与患者临床表现及预后相关。脑实质结核患者较脑膜结核或混合型颅内结核患者临床症状轻,预后好;脑积水和脑梗死是远期预后不良的独立危险因素,脑积水是患者死亡的独立危险因素。

结核;脑;磁共振成像;预后
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo study the association of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics with prognosis of patients with intracranial tuberculosis.

MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2016, the MR images and case records of 420 patients with intracranial tuberculosis in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. There were 220 males and 200 females, aging 8 to 83 years, with a median age of 28.5 years. According to MRI, 93 patients were classified as meningeal tuberculosis, 192 patients as parenchymal tuberculosis, 82 patients as mixed intracranial tuberculosis, and another 31 patients showing no obvious abnormalities while 22 patients had only leukoencephalopathy. The measurement data were analyzed by t test. Chi square test was used to count data analysis. The prognosis related factors were retrospectively analyzed by Logistic regression. P<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

ResultsThe direct signs of MR imaging of meningeal tuberculosis were meningeal exudation, thickening and enhancement. Secondary changes included hydrocephalus, cerebrovascular inflammation, cerebral infarction and cranial nerve involvement. Brain parenchymal tuberculosis included brain parenchymal tuberculoma, tuberculous abscess and tuberculous encephalitis. Brain parenchymal tuberculoma showed solid nodules, with equal or slightly low signal on T 1WI, high signal on T 2WI, low signal on T 2WI after central necrosis, high signal on T 2WI during liquefaction of necrosis, homogeneous enhancement nodules on enhanced scan without necrosis, and ring enhancement nodules with necrosis. Tuberculous abscess manifested as a ring-shaped enhancement of the abscess wall with aggravated pus with limited diffusion. Tuberculous encephalitis manifested as gyrus-like high signal on T 2WI, low signal on T 1WI, and uneven enhancement on enhanced scan. Mixed intracranial tuberculosis had features of both meningeal tuberculosis and parenchymal tuberculosis. The Barthel scores at admission and discharge of the meningeal tuberculosis group were (53±30) and (61±28), while those of the parenchymal tuberculosis group were (77±29) and (81±26), and those of the mixed intracranial tuberculosis group were (58±29) and (66±28). The Barthel scores at admission and discharge of the meningeal tuberculosis group and mixed intracranial tuberculosis group were significantly lower than those of the parenchymal tuberculosis group ( P<0.001). There were 151 patients with poor prognosis at discharge (Barthel score ≤60 points) and 71 patients with poor long-term prognosis (death or dysfunction after follow-up for at least 12 months). There were 35 patients who died. The poor prognosis rate at discharge, at long-term and the mortality rate of meningeal tuberculosis group were 50.5%(47/93), 25.8%(24/93) and 15.1%(14/93), respectively, while those of the cerebral parenchymal tuberculosis group were 23.4%(45/192), 12.5%(24/192), 5.7%(11/192), respectively, and those of the mixed intracranial tuberculosis group were 47.6%(39/82), 20.7%(17/82) and 7.3%(6/82), respectively. The poor prognosis rate at discharge and at long-term were higher than the cerebral parenchymal tuberculosis group(all P<0.05). The mortality rate of meningeal tuberculosis group was higher than the cerebral parenchymal tuberculosis group ( P=0.009). Logistic regression showed that peri-mesencephalic cisterns involvement( OR=2.339, 95 %CI 1.355-4.037, P=0.002), hydrocephalus( OR=3.896, 95 %CI 2.077-7.308, P<0.001), cerebral infarction ( OR=3.282, 95 %CI 1.615-6.670, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis at discharge. While hydrocephalus ( OR=4.458, 95 %CI 2.341-8.492, P<0.001) and cerebral infarction ( OR=2.456, 95% CI 1.179-5.114, P=0.016) were independent risk factors for long-term prognosis. Hydrocephalus ( OR=6.803, 95% CI 3.119-14.839, P<0.001) was the only independent risk factor for death.

ConclusionsMR imaging classification of intracranial tuberculosis was correlated with clinical manifestations and prognosis of the patients. The prognosis of patients with meningeal exudation was worse than that of patients with parenchymal tuberculoma. Hydrocephalus was independently associated with the risk of death in patients with intracranial tuberculosis.

Tuberculosis;Brain;Magnetic resonance imaging;Prognosis
Hou Dailun1,Email: mocdef.6ab21neledoh
Lyu Pingxin, Email: mocdef.3ab619021xpl
引用本文

李多,吕岩,王岳,等. 颅内结核核磁共振影像分型与患者预后的关系[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志,2020,43(1):27-34.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2020.01.008

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
颅内结核患者的病死率及致残率高,神经系统后遗症包括偏瘫、截瘫、视力和听力受损 [ 1 ]。2015年《中华结核和呼吸杂志》发表了中华医学会结核病学分会制定的"颅内结核影像学分型专家共识" [ 2 ],按照结核病变累及部位将颅内结核分为脑膜结核、脑实质结核和混合型颅内结核,但缺乏其影像学分型与临床相关性的研究。本研究按照共识中提出的颅内结核分型进一步分析颅内结核分型与患者预后的关系,现将结果报道如下。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Modi M , Sharma K , Prabhakar S ,et al. Clinical and radiological predictors of outcome in tubercular meningitis: a prospective study of 209 patients[J]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2017,161:29-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
中华医学会结核病学分会. 颅内结核影像学分型专家共识[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2015,38(11):805-809. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2015.11.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
李奎成唐丹刘晓艳. 国内Barthel指数和改良Barthel指数应用的回顾性研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2009,8(24):737-740. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2009.08.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Leonard JM . Central Nervous System Tuberculosis[J]. Microbiol Spectr, 2017,5(2). DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0044-2017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Synmon B , Das M , Kayal AK ,et al. Clinical and radiological spectrum of intracranial tuberculosis: a hospital based study in Northeast India[J]. Indian J Tuberc, 2017,64(2):109-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijtb.2016.11.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
过丽芳吕岩周新华. 颅内结核的MRI特点及抗结核治疗动态分析[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2014,48(3):202-206. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2014.03.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Kalita J , Misra UK , Ranjan P . Tuberculous meningitis with pulmonary miliary tuberculosis: a clinicoradiological study[J]. Neurol India, 2004,52(2):194-196.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Ramachandran R , Muniyandi M , Iyer V ,et al. Dilemmas in the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial tuberculomas[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2017,381:256-264. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.08.3258 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Lee HG , William T , Menon J ,et al. Tuberculous meningitis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in adults with central nervous system infections in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia: an observational study[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2016,16:296. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1640-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
吴晓光李雪莲陈红梅. 结核性脑膜炎患者死亡危险因素分析[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2015,8:29-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2015.08.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Nataprawira HM , Ruslianti V , Solek P ,et al. Outcome of tuberculous meningitis in children: the first comprehensive retrospective cohort study in Indonesia[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2016,20(7):909-914. DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0555 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Kaur H , Sharma K , Modi M ,et al. Prospective Analysis of 55 Cases of Tuberculosis Meningitis (TBM) in North India[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2015,9(1):15-19. DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/11456.5454 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
任斐李冬周倩倩. 影响儿童结核性脑膜炎患者近期预后的相关因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2014,36(11):930-935. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.11.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
杨燕张侠. 影响80例结核性脑膜炎患者近期疗效相关因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2012,34(5):327-330.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
毛晓辉王勃吴璇. 结核性脑膜炎患者死亡的影响因素分析[J]. 中国防痨杂志, 2011,12(33):794-797.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Shaikh MA , Shah M , Channa F . Criteria indicating morbidity in tuberculous meningitis[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2012,62(11):1137-1139.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Gu J , Xiao H , Wu F ,et al. Prognostic factors of tuberculous meningitis: a single-center study[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015,8(3):4487-4493.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Wasay M , Farooq S , Khowaja ZA ,et al. Cerebral infarction and tuberculoma in central nervous system tuberculosis: frequency and prognostic implications[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2014,85(11):1260-1264. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307178 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Sheu JJ , Hsu CY , Yuan RY ,et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment delay of cerebral infarction in tuberculous meningitis[J]. Intern Med J, 2012,42(3):294-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02256.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Anuradha HK , Garg RK , Agarwal A ,et al. Predictors of stroke in patients of tuberculous meningitis and its effect on the outcome[J]. QJM, 2010,103(9):671-678. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq103 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Sharma P , Garg RK , Verma R ,et al. Incidence, predictors and prognostic value of cranial nerve involvement in patients with tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective evaluation[J]. Eur J Intern Med, 2011,22(3):289-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.01.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Li H , Liu W , You C . Central nervous system tuberculoma[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2012,19(5):691-695. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.045 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Anuradha HK , Garg RK , Sinha MK ,et al. Intracranial tuberculomas in patients with tuberculous meningitis: predictors and prognostic significance[J]. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2011,15(2):234-239.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Wasay M , Moolani MK , Zaheer J ,et al. Prognostic indicators in patients with intracranial tuberculoma: a review of 102 cases[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2004,54(2):83-87.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
侯代伦,Email: mocdef.6ab21neledoh
B
吕平欣,Email: mocdef.3ab619021xpl
C

李多:图像分析,数据整理,统计分析,论文撰写;吕岩:图像分析;王岳:数据整理;马大庆:研究指导,论文修改;侯代伦,吕平欣:研究设计,论文修改

D
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
E
北京市优秀人才项目 (2017000021469G283)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号