临床论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
自锚式腰椎侧方椎体间融合术在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用
徐宝山
许海委
胡永成
刘阳
马信龙
姜洪丰
刘越
王涛
黎宁
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200408-00234
Application of self-anchored lateral lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative diseases
Xu Baoshan
Xu Haiwei
Hu Yongcheng
Liu Yang
Ma Xinlong
Jiang Hongfeng
Liu Yue
Wang Tao
Li Ning
Authors Info & Affiliations
Xu Baoshan
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Xu Haiwei
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Hu Yongcheng
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Liu Yang
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Ma Xinlong
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Jiang Hongfeng
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Liu Yue
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Wang Tao
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
Li Ning
Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200408-00234
465
165
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨自锚式腰椎侧方椎体间融合术(self anchored lateral lumbar interbody fusion,SA-LLIF)治疗腰椎退行性疾病的临床疗效。

方法2019年1至12月采用SA-LLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者41例,男18例,女23例;年龄(59.6±11.3)岁(范围49~77岁)。诊断包括腰椎失稳伴椎管狭窄17例、椎间盘退变性疾病8例、退变性滑脱8例、退变性侧凸5例、融合术后翻修3例,其中5例伴骨质疏松;责任节段包括L 2, 3 2例、L 3, 4 11例、L 4, 5 20例、L 2~L 4 3例、L 3~L 5 5例。手术采用侧卧位,取椎间隙中点斜向腹侧6 cm小切口,经腹膜外入路显露腰大肌前缘,向背侧牵开腰大肌,切除椎间盘及处理椎间隙,试模撑开,经同切口取髂骨填充融合器,正侧方植入融合器,以融合器远侧和近侧嵌片锚定融合器与相邻椎体。术后评估疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale, VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、融合器位置、腰椎前凸角、椎间隙高度和滑脱率。

结果手术时间(79.0±19.5)min(范围60~100 min);术中出血量(38.0±28.2)ml(范围15~70 ml)。术后随访(10.6±4.6)个月(范围4~15个月)。41例患者VAS评分由术前(6.2±2.1)分降低至术后3个月(1.9±1.2)分、末次随访时(1.6±1.1)分,手术前后的差异有统计学意义( F=107.48, P=0.00);末次随访时VAS改善率为73.9%±16.4%,各病因组改善率的差异无统计学意义( F=0.13 , P=0.97)。ODI由术前47.8%±15.1%降低至术后3个月14.6%±10.5%、末次随访时11.0%±7.3%,手术前后的差异有统计学意义( F=129.29 , P=0.00);末次随访时ODI改善率为75.8%±16.9%,各病因组改善率的差异无统计学意义( F=0.01, P=0.99 )。腰椎X线片示脊柱序列明显恢复,融合器无移位或脱位。7例出现融合器下沉2~3 mm,除1例肥胖患者一过性腰痛外均无明显临床症状。末次随访时腰椎前凸角由术前36.4°±10.2°恢复至48.0°±10.7°,椎间隙高度由术前(8.3±2.5)mm恢复至(11.3±3.3)mm, 8例腰椎滑脱患者滑脱率由术前19.7%±4.4%减少至9.3%±5.3%,手术前后差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05)。

结论SA-LLIF治疗腰椎退行性疾病可以增加单纯LLIF的即刻稳定性,避免后路内固定,术后近期疗效满意。

腰椎;椎间盘退行性变;脊柱融合术;外科手术,微创性
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of self-anchored lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.

MethodsDuring January to December in 2019, a total of 41 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were treated with SA-LLIF, included 18 males and 23 females, aged 59.6±11.3 (range 49-77) years. There were lumbar stenosis and instability in 17 cases, disc degenerative disease in 8 cases, degenerative spondylolisthesis in 8 cases, degenerative scoliosis in 5 cases, postoperative revision in 3 cases. And osteoporosis was diagnosed in 5 of them. The index level included L 2, 3 in 2 cases, L 3, 4 in 11 cases, L 4, 5 in 20 cases, L 2-L 4 in 3 cases and L 3-L 5 in 5 cases. After general anesthesia, the patient was placed in decubitus position. The anterior edge of psoas major muscle was exposed through 6 cm incision and extraperitoneal approach. Further, the psoas major muscle was properly retracted to expose the disc. After discectomy, the intervertebral space was prepared and moderately distracted. A suitable fusion cage filled with auto iliac graft was implanted. Two anchoring plates were inserted into the cage. Then, the caudal and cephalic vertebral body and the fusion cage were locked.

ResultsThe operation was performed successfully in all the patients. The operation duration was 79.0±19.5 (range 60-100) min. Intraoperative bleed loss was 38.0±28.2 (range 15-70) ml. The patients were followed up for averagely 10.6±4.6 (range 4-15) months. The visual analogue scale decreased from preoperative 6.2±2.1 to 1.6±1.1 and Oswestry disability index decreased from 47.8%±15.1% to 11.0%±7.3%. X-ray showed that the spine alignment recovered satisfactorily. No cage displacement was found. Sinking (2-3 mm) of cage was found in 7 patients without obvious symptom despite transient lumbar pain in an obesity woman. The lumbar lordosis recovered from 36.4°±10.2° to 48.0°±10.7°, and intervertebral height recovered from 8.3±2.5 mm to 11.3±3.3 mm. The rate of spondylolisthesis recovered from 19.7%±4.4% to 9.3%±5.3%.

ConclusionSA-LLIF can provide immediate stability and good results for lumbar degenerative diseases with stand-alone anchoring cage without posterior internal fixation.

Lumbar vertebrae;Intervertebral disc degeneration;Spinal fusion;Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
引用本文

徐宝山,许海委,胡永成,等. 自锚式腰椎侧方椎体间融合术在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2020,40(08):536-545.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20200408-00234

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
腰椎侧方椎体间融合术(lateral lumbar interbody fusion,LLIF)最早由Mayer [ 1 ]在1997年报告。该术式可避免后侧结构损伤和前路复杂的分离,减少相关并发症。由于经腰大肌入路的极外侧融合术(extreme lateral interbody fusion,XLIF)、直接外侧融合术(direct lateral interbody fusion,DLIF)有干扰腰丛神经的问题,2012年Silvestre等 [ 2 ]报告了采用经腰大肌和大血管之间的自然间隙显露椎间盘的术式,可降低腰丛神经损伤的风险,并将其命名为斜外侧椎间融合术(oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion,OLIF)。LLIF或OLIF均采用小切口撑开腹肌和腹膜外入路,切除椎间盘后撑开椎间隙,自侧方植入融合器,通过撑开压缩原理获得即时稳定 [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]。由于不进入椎管,降低了神经损伤和硬膜外粘连的风险,并有间接减压和复位作用,因此具有切口小、出血少、并发症少、恢复快等优点,近年来得到广泛推崇 [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]
随着LLIF和OLIF应用的增多,不断有研究报告这两种术式的融合器移位和下沉发生率较高,尤其是未辅助内固定的单独融合器(stand alone cage) [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]。Woods等 [ 9 ]报告137例OLIF,并发症发生率为11.7%,终板塌陷为最常见的并发症(4.4%)。Le等 [ 10 ]报告140例OLIF,术后14.3%的患者出现融合器移位或下沉。Abe等 [ 11 ]报告使用单独融合器的OLIF并发症发生率高达48.3%,其中终板骨折和融合器下沉发生率为18.7%。我们在临床中发现使用单独融合器的OLIF术后近一半的患者发生不同程度的椎体终板塌陷或融合器下沉,可能与椎体和融合器界面磨合匹配有关。另外,使用单独融合器的OLIF术后融合器侧方移位甚至脱出者也屡有报告,显然与稳定性不足有关 [ 12 ]。因此,目前很多学者建议LLIF或OLIF手术时联合后路椎弓根内固定来增加稳定性。但辅助后路椎弓根内固定无疑增加了手术步骤、手术时间,并带来手术创伤和可能的内固定相关并发症;辅助前路椎体钛板固定也需扩大显露范围,甚至处理节段血管,钛板等内植物还要切断、占据腰大肌附着点及挤压腰丛神经 [ 7 ]。前后路内固定均明显增加手术步骤、手术时间、创伤和花费,与Mis-TLIF相比大大降低了LLIF微创手术的优势 [ 13 ]
为避免后路椎弓根内固定或前路钛板固定,我们在LLIF术中采用带锚定嵌片的自锚式融合器,即自锚式腰椎侧方椎体间融合术(self-anchored lateral lumbar interbody fusion,SA-LLIF),通过零切迹的锚定嵌片增加融合器稳定性,不需要增加手术显露范围,不影响腰大肌和腰丛神经的解剖位置,达到微创手术的目的。
本研究分析采用SA-LLIF治疗的腰椎退变性疾病患者,评估术后临床疗效和影像学预后。研究目的:①探讨SA-LLIF采用锚定嵌片增加稳定性的优势;②探讨SA-LLIF的操作要点;③探讨SA-LLIF的疗效及通过锚定融合器避免后路内固定、简化手术步骤的可行性;④探讨SA-LLIF的手术适应证。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Mayer HM . A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbodyfusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997,22(6):691-699. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Silvestre C , MacThiong JM , Hilmi R ,et al. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion:oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012,6(2):89-97. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Sato J , Ohtori S , Orita S ,et al. Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Euro Spine J, 2017,26(3):671-678. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4170-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Li JX , Phan K , Mobbs R . Oblique lumbar interbody fusion: technical aspects, operative outcomes, and complications[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,98:113-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
张建锋范顺武方向前. 斜外侧椎间融合术在单节段腰椎间盘退行性疾病中的应用[J]中华骨科杂志, 2017,37(2):80-88. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.02.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang JF , Fan SW , Fang XQ ,et al. Clinical value of one-level oblique lateral interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc diseases[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2017,37(2):80-88. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2017.02.003 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
Marchi L , Abdala N , Oliveira L ,et al. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbodyfusion[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013,19(1):110-118. DOI: 10.3171/2013.4.spine12319 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Wang K , Zhang C , Cheng C ,et al. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined oblique lumbar interbody fusion and lateral instrumentation for the treatment of degenerative spine deformity: a preliminary retrospective study[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2019,2019:5672162. DOI: 10.1155/2019/5672162 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Siepe CJ , Stosch-Wiechert K , Heider F ,et al. Anterior stand-alone fusion revisited: a prospective clinical, X-ray and CT investigation[J]. Euro Spine J, 2015,24(4):838-851. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3642-y .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Woods KR , Billys JB , Hynes RA . Technical description of oblique lateral interbod y fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25)and at L5-S1 (OLIF51 )and evaluation of complication and fusion rates [J]. Spine J, 2017,17(4):545-553. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Le TV , Baaj AA , Dakwar E ,et al. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbodyfusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012,37(14):1268-1273. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3182458b2f .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Abe K , Orita S , Mannoji C ,et al. Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery:perspectives and indications from a retrospective, mult icenter survey [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017,42(1):55-62. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001650 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Fujibayashi S , Kawakami N , Asazuma T ,et al. Complications associated with lateral interbody fusion: nationwide survey of 2998 cases during the first 2 years of its use in Japan[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017,42(19):1478-1484. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002139 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Mobbs RJ , Phan K , Malham G ,et al. Lumbar interbody fusion:techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF[J]. J Spine Surg, 2015,1(1):2-18. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Kornblum MB , Turner AW , Cornwall GB ,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyetheretherketone interbody cage with integrated screws[J]. Spine J, 2013,13(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.11.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Kuang L , Chen Y , Li L ,et al. Applying the mini-open anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion with self-anchored stand-alone polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar revision surgery[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2016,2016:1758352. DOI: 10.1155/2016/1758352 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Allain J , Delecrin J , Beaurain J ,et al. Stand-alone ALIF with integrated intracorporeal anchoring plates in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disc disease: a prospective study on 65 cases[J]. Euro Spine J, 2014,23(10):2136-2143. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3364-1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
徐宝山马信龙脊柱骨盆矢状力线在脊柱疾患中的意义[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2012,32(1):80-85. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.01.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu BS , Ma XL . The significance of sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in spinal diseases[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2012,32(1):80-85. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.01.014 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A

治疗性研究Ⅳ级

B
国家自然科学基金 (31670983)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号