目的以老龄小鼠片段化睡眠(SF)模型模拟临床术后患者的睡眠模式,探讨术后片段化睡眠对围术期神经认知障碍(PND)和中枢神经炎症的影响。
方法32只老龄ICR小鼠随机分为4组( n=8):正常组(C组)、手术组(S组)、片段化睡眠组(F组)和手术+片段化睡眠组(D组)。于胫骨骨折内固定手术后进行片段化睡眠干预,采用新物体识别实验和条件性恐惧实验进行认知功能评估,采用ELISA检测海马炎症因子表达的变化。
结果新物体识别实验:C组、S组、F组和D组小鼠辨别指数(RI)分别为0.69±0.07、0.48±0.07、0.54±0.10、0.50±0.12,S组、F组和D组小鼠RI均显著低于C组( t=4.885、3.521、4.433,均 P<0.01),S组和D组小鼠RI差异无统计学意义( t=0.967 1, P>0.05)。场景恐惧实验:C组、S组、F组和D组小鼠僵直时间分别为(21.34±6.48)、(13.83±4.26)、(11.50±6.25)、(6.17±4.77)s,S组、F组和D组小鼠僵直时间均显著低于C组( t=2.722、3.566、5.496, P<0.05或 P<0.01),D组小鼠僵直时间显著低于S组( t=2.774, P<0.05)。线索恐惧实验:C组、S组、F组和D组小鼠僵直时间分别为(74.36±17.09)、(43.91±9.71)、(46.34±13.43)、(24.90±14.21)s,S组、F组和D组小鼠僵直时间均显著低于C组( t=4.393、4.043、7.136,均 P<0.01),D组小鼠僵直时间显著低于S组( t=2.743, P<0.05)。S组、F组和D组小鼠海马肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)、白细胞介素(IL)-6和IL-1β均显著高于C组,D组小鼠海马TNF-α、IL-6显著高于S组,差异均有统计学意义( P<0.05或 P<0.01)。
结论术后片段化睡眠加剧老龄小鼠术后认知功能损害,增加海马炎症因子的表达。
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of sleep fragmentation on perioperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) and central neuroinflammation by simulating sleep patterns of postoperative patients with sleep fragmentation in aged mice.
MethodsThirty-two elderly ICR mice were randomly divided into four groups ( n=8): normal group (C), surgery group (S), fragmented sleep group (F), and surgery+fragmented sleep group (D). Fragmented sleep was conducted after internal fixation of tibia fractures, cognitive function was evaluated by novel object recognition (NOR) and fear conditioning (FC) test, and changes in expression of inflammatory cytokines in hippocampus were detected by ELISA.
ResultsNOR test: the recognition index (RI) of mice in group C, group S, group F and group D was 0.69±0.07, 0.48±0.07, 0.54±0.10 and 0.50±0.12, respectively. The RI of mice in group S, group F and group D was significantly lower than that in group C ( t=4.885, 3.521 and 4.433, all P<0.01). There was no significant difference in RI between group S and group D ( t=0.967 1, P>0.05). Contextual FC test: the freezing time of mice in group C, group S, group F and group D was(21.34±6.48), (13.83±4.26), (11.50±6.25) and (6.17±4.77) s, respectively. The freezing time of mice in group S, group F and group D was significantly lower than that in group C ( t=2.722, 3.566, 5.496, P<0.05 or P<0.01). The freezing time of mice in group D was significantly lower than that in group S ( t=2.774, P<0.05). Cue FC test: the freezing time of mice in group C, group S, group F and group D was (74.36±17.09), (43.91±9.71), (46.34±13.43) and (24.90±14.21) s, respectively. The freezing time of mice in group S, group F and group D was significantly lower than that in group C ( t=4.393, 4.043 and 7.136, all P<0.01). The freezing time of mice in group D was significantly lower than that in group S ( t=2.743, P<0.05). The levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in hippocampus of mice in group S, F and D were significantly higher than those in group C, while the levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in hippocampus of mice in group D were significantly higher than those in group S, with statistically significant differences ( P<0.05 or P<0.01).
ConclusionPostoperative fragmented sleep aggravates postoperative cognitive impairment and increases the hippocampal neuroinflammation in aged mice.
卢波,刘荣君,孟波,等. 片段化睡眠对术后认知功能和中枢神经炎症的影响[J]. 中华医学杂志,2020,100(17):1341-1344.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20191215-02734版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
组别 | 辨别指数 | 场景诱发僵直时间(s) | 线索诱发僵直时间(s) |
---|---|---|---|
C组 | 0.69±0.07 | 21±6 | 74±17 |
S组 | 0.48±0.07 b | 14±4 a | 44±10 b |
F组 | 0.54±0.10 b | 12±6 b | 46±13 b |
D组 | 0.50±0.12 b | 6±5 bc | 25±14 bc |
F值 | 9.40 | 10.41 | 17.30 |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
注:C组:正常组;S组:手术组;F组:片段化睡眠组;D组:手术+片段化睡眠组;与C组比较, a P<0.05, b P<0.01;与S组比较, c P<0.05
组别 | TNFα | IL6 | IL1β |
---|---|---|---|
C组 | 6±3 | 7±5 | 30±6 |
S组 | 13±4 a | 13±3 a | 49±9 b |
F组 | 14±5 b | 13±3 a | 48±8 b |
D组 | 20±6 bc | 21±6 bd | 54±6 b |
F值 | 13.42 | 14.22 | 17.95 |
P值 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
注:TNF:肿瘤坏死因子;IL:白细胞介素;C组:正常组;S组:手术组;F组:片段化睡眠组;D组:手术+片段化睡眠组;与C组比较, a P<0.05, b P<0.01;与S组比较, c P<0.05, d P<0.01

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。