论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
中国不同出生胎龄新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的生长参照标准及曲线
首都儿科研究所
九市儿童体格发育调查协作组
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200316-00242
Growth standard curves of birth weight, length and head circumference of Chinese newborns of different gestation
Capital Institute of Pediatrics
the Coordinating Study Group of Nine Cities on the Physical Growth and Development of Children
Li Hui
Authors Info & Affiliations
Capital Institute of Pediatrics
the Coordinating Study Group of Nine Cities on the Physical Growth and Development of Children
Li Hui
Department of Growth and Development, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200316-00242
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的研究制定中国24~42周出生胎龄新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的生长参照标准及曲线,供临床及相关领域研究工作使用。

方法于2015年6月至2018年11月采用整群抽样方法,调查北京、哈尔滨、西安、上海、南京、武汉、广州、福州、昆明等城市24~42周出生胎龄的新生儿24 375名。采用基于位置、尺度、形状的广义可加模型(GAMLSS)建立24~42周出生胎龄男、女新生儿的出生体重、身长和头围的百分位参照标准及曲线。将制定的参照标准与我国1988年参照值及国际Fenton2013参照值进行比较。

结果受调查新生儿中早产儿12 264名、足月儿12 111名。采用男新生儿13 197名(54.1%)、女新生儿11 178名(45.9%)制定出了出生胎龄24~42周的男、女新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的百分位数(P) 3、P 10、P 25、P 50、P 75、P 90和P 97参照值和曲线图,3项指标均随出生胎龄增加呈增长趋势,出生胎龄37周以后生长速率略有下降,如男新生儿28、32、37、40周出生胎龄体重的中位数依次为1 154、1 805、2 943和3 455 g。各个出生胎龄组男新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的生长水平分别比女新生儿高87~133 g、0.2~0.9 cm和0.3~0.6 cm。本研究男、女出生胎龄37~42周新生儿出生体重P 10、P 50、P 90均明显高于1988年参照值(如男P 50高115~242 g)。本研究出生胎龄33周之前出生的新生儿出生体重P 50略高于Fenton2013参照值13~81 g,之后逐渐低于Fenton2013,41~42周差值达148~367 g;Fenton2013出生体重的P 10曲线在出生胎龄40周前男女均低于本研究11~64 g。

结论新建立了中国出生胎龄24~42周男、女新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的生长参照标准,供新生儿出生时及早产儿生后早期的生长和营养评价,建议将出生体重低于本参照标准P 10作为小于胎龄儿(SGA)界值点,将低于P 3作为重度SGA界值点。

婴儿,新生;出生体重;身长;头围;生长标准
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo study and formulate the growth standards for birth weight, length and head circumference of Chinese newborns of different gestation.

MethodsA cross-sectional survey was carried out by the stratified cluster sampling method from June 2015 to November 2018 in 13 cities including Beijing, Harbin, Xi′an, Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuhan, Guangzhou, Fuzhou, Kunming, Tianjin, Shenyang, Changsha and Shenzhen. A total of 24 375 newborns with gestational age between 24 to 42 weeks were included. The standard percentile-curves of birth weight, length and head circumference for newborn boys and girls in gestational weeks 24 to 42 were established by the generalized additive model for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS). The new reference standard developed in this study was compared with the reference values of China in 1988 and the international Fenton 2013.

ResultsAmong the 24 375 newborns (13 197 males (54.1%),11 178 females (45.9%)), 12 264 were preterm infants and 12 111 were full term infants. The 3 rd, 10 th, 25 th, 50 th, 75 th, 90 th and 97 th percentile reference values and curves of birth weight, length and head circumference were obtained for male and female newborns from 24 to 42 gestation weeks. The data showed that birth weight, length and head circumference increased rapidly with the gestational age, but the growth velocity decreased slightly from 37 weeks. For example, the median birth weight for males at 28 weeks, 32 weeks, 37 weeks and 40 weeks was 1 154, 1 805, 2 943 and 3 455 g, respectively. The birth weight, length and head circumference of males at all gestational ages were 87-133 g, 0.2-0.9 cm and 0.3-0.6 cm higher than those of females, respectively. Compared with the percentile curves of birth weight of Chinese reference in 1988, there were significant differences regarding the percentile lines of males and females, especially the 10 th, 50 th, and 90 th percentile values of birth weight were significantly higher than the reference values in 1988 from 37 to 42 gestation weeks. For example, the median birth weight at 40 weeks in the study was 115-242 g higher than that in 1988. Compared with the standard reference of Fenton 2013, the reference curve at 50 th percentile of birth weight in this study was 13-81 g slightly higher than that of Fenton 2013 before 33 weeks, and then it was gradually lower than that of Fenton 2013 and the difference was 148-367 g at 41 to 42 weeks of gestation. The 10 th percentile curve of Fenton 2013 was 11-64 g lower than that of this study in both males and females before 40 weeks.

ConclusionsThis study created a new national growth standard of birth weight, body length and head circumference for Chinese neonates at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation, which can be used for the growth and nutrition evaluation of newborns at birth and preterm infants in the early postnatal period. The 10 th percentile and the 3 rd percentile of growth standards could be suggested as the cut-off point for identifying small for gestational age and severe small for gestational age, respectively.

Infant, newborn;Birth weight;Birth length;Head circumference;Growth standards
Li Hui, Department of Growth and Development, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing 100020, China, Email: mocdef.3ab61htworgiliuh
引用本文

首都儿科研究所,九市儿童体格发育调查协作组. 中国不同出生胎龄新生儿出生体重、身长和头围的生长参照标准及曲线[J]. 中华儿科杂志,2020,58(09):738-746.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200316-00242

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
新生婴儿的体格发育水平不仅反映宫内生长和营养状况,也是影响生后早期生存和健康发育的重要因素。随着我国超低出生体重儿和巨大儿的增多,其日后的生长发育问题和成年后健康风险备受关注。尤其是越来越多的早产儿被抢救存活,这些早产儿却由于发育成熟度低、宫内营养储备不足或存在不同程度的宫内生长迟缓,在生后面临高发病率、高致残率等问题,甚至影响儿童期的生长以及成年后健康和生活质量 [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]。因此,如何保证和促进他们的正常生长发育及日后健康已成为影响社会人口质量的重要公共卫生问题 [ 4 ]。由于出生体重和出生胎龄是影响生后早期生长发育的重要因素,因此对新生儿生长发育状况进行分类评估及连续监测是十分重要的儿科临床和儿童保健工作内容,其中适宜的评价标准是必不可少的常规工具。目前我国不同胎龄新生儿体格发育评价仍然沿用1988年"我国15城市不同胎龄新生儿体格发育调查研究"制定的参照值 [ 5 ],由于该参照值存在数据陈旧、小胎龄样本量不足、缺乏出生胎龄28周以下数据以及统计方法的时代局限性等问题,已不适用于评价当今我国新生儿生长发育状况。因此,在国家卫生健康委员会妇幼健康服务司的组织领导下,于2015年6月至2018年11月开展了专项调查,旨在了解我国不同出生胎龄新生儿的体格发育现状,研究制定新的不同胎龄新生儿生长评价参照标准,以供儿科临床、围生期保健及相关科研工作参照使用,为进一步促进婴儿生后早期的生长监测、营养评估以及科学喂养等提供理论及实践依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Katz J , Lee AC , Kozuki N ,et al. Mortality risk in preterm and small-for-gestational-age infants in low-income and middle-income countries: a pooled country analysis[J]. Lancet, 2013,382(9890):417-425. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60993-9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Lee AC , Kozuki N , Cousens S ,et al. Estimates of burden and consequences of infants born small for gestational age in low and middle income countries with INTERGROWTH-21st standard: analysis of CHERG datasets[J]. BMJ, 2017,358:j3677. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3677 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Villar J , Giuliani F , Barros F ,et al. Monitoring the postnatal growth of preterm infants: a paradigm change[J]. Pediatrics, 2018,141(2):e20172467. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2467 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
March of Dimes,PMNCH,Save the Children,WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth[M/OL]. Howson CP , Kinney MV , Lawn JE ,eds. 2012[2019-03-01]. Geneva:World Health Organization, 2012. https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon-report.pdf.
[5]
中国15城市新生儿体格发育科研协作组. 我国15城市不同胎龄新生儿体格发育调查研究[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 1988,26(4):206.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Rigby RA , Stasinopoulos DM . Automatic smoothing parameter selection in GAMLSS with an application to centile estimation[J]. Stat Methods Med Res, 2014,23(4):318-332. DOI: 10.1177/0962280212473302 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Royston P , Wright EM . Goodness-of-fit statistics for age-specific reference intervals[J]. Stat Med, 2000,19(21):2943-2962. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0258(20001115)19:21<2943::aid-sim559>3.0.co;2-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
van Buuren S , Fredriks M . Worm plot: a simple diagnostic device for modelling growth reference curves[J]. Stat Med, 2001,20(8):1259-1277. DOI: 10.1002/sim.746 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
张宝林. 中国15城市不同胎龄男女新生儿出生体重值修正报告[J]. 实用儿科杂志, 1992,7(6):306-307.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Fenton TR , Kim JH . A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants[J]. BMC Pediatr, 2013,13:59. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Villar J , Cheikh Ismail L , Victora CG ,et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project[J]. Lancet, 2014,384(9946):857-868. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60932-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Olsen IE , Groveman SA , Lawson ML ,et al. New intrauterine growth curves based on United States data[J]. Pediatrics, 2010,125(2):e214-224. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-0913 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Visser GH , Eilers PH , Elferink-Stinkens PM ,et al. New Dutch reference curves for birthweight by gestational age[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2009,85(12):737-744. DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2009.09.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Sankilampi U , Hannila ML , Saari A ,et al. New population-based references for birth weight, length, and head circumference in singletons and twins from 23 to 43 gestation weeks[J]. Ann Med, 2013,45(5-6):446-454. DOI: 10.3109/07853890.2013.803739 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Norris T , Seaton SE , Manktelow BN ,et al. Updated birth weight centiles for England and Wales[J]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2018,103(6):F577-F582. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313452 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Ohuma EO , Altman DG ,International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st Project). Design and other methodological considerations for the construction of human fetal and neonatal size and growth charts[J]. Stat Med, 2019,38(19):3527-3539. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8000 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Zhang YQ , Li H . Changes in weight, length, head circumference, and ponderal index at birth of healthy term newborns in nine cities in China during the period of rapid social development 1985-2005[J]. Econ Hum Biol, 2015,19:45-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2015.07.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Dai L , Deng C , Li Y ,et al. Birth weight reference percentiles for Chinese[J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(8):e104779. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104779 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
朱丽张蓉张淑莲,. 中国不同胎龄新生儿出生体重曲线研制[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 2015,53(2):97-103. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2015.02.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Hoftiezer L , Hof M , Dijs-Elsinga J ,et al. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019,220(4):383.e1-383.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.023 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Buck Louis GM , Grewal J , Albert PS ,et al. Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2015,213(4):449.e1-449.e41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Kiserud T , Benachi A , Hecher K ,et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018,218(2S):S619-619S629. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Lubchenco LO , Hansman C , Boyd E . Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks[J]. Pediatrics, 1966,37(3):403-408.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Lee PA , Chernausek SD , Hokken-Koelega AC ,et al. International small for gestational age advisory board consensus development conference statement: management of short children born small for gestational age, April 24-October 1, 2001[J]. Pediatrics, 2003,111(6Pt 1):1253-1261. DOI: 10.1542/peds.111.6.1253
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Schlaudecker EP , Munoz FM , Bardají A ,et al. Small for gestational age: case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data[J]. Vaccine, 2017,35(48Pt A):6518-6528. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.01.040 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Vieira MC , Relph S , Persson M ,et al. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and intergrowth charts: a Swedish population-based cohort study[J]. PLoS Med, 2019,16(9):e1002902. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002902 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
Karlberg J , Albertsson-Wikland K . Growth in full-term small-for-gestational-age infants: from birth to final height[J]. Pediatr Res, 1995,38(5):733-739. DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199511000-00017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Taal HR , Vd Heijden AJ , Steegers EA ,et al. Small and large size for gestational age at birth, infant growth, and childhood overweight[J]. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2013,21(6):1261-1268. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20116 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[29]
Barbier A , Boivin A , Yoon W ,et al. New reference curves for head circumference at birth, by gestational age[J]. Pediatrics, 2013,131(4):e1158-1167. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2011-3846 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
李辉,首都儿科研究所生长发育研究室,北京100020,Email: mocdef.3ab61htworgiliuh
B
所有参与新生儿调查的工作人员的辛苦付出;Fenton TR教授分享Fenton2013参照数值
C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
国家卫生健康委员会妇幼健康服务司委托项目 (2015-42)
国家卫生健康委员会法制司卫生标准制修订项目 (20151004)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号