临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
SMILE与FS-LASIK术后调制传递函数在不同空间频率的变化
崔彤
王雁
张琳
程文博
赵伟
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210310-00159
Comparison of modulation transfer function between the eyes after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis
Cui Tong
Wang Yan
Zhang Lin
Cheng Wenbo
Zhao Wei
Authors Info & Affiliations
Cui Tong
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin 300020, China
Wang Yan
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin 300020, China
Zhang Lin
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin 300020, China
Cheng Wenbo
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin 300020, China
Zhao Wei
Clinical College of Ophthalmology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin 300020, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210310-00159
475
62
0
0
1
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)与飞秒激光辅助准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(FS-LASIK)术后眼调制传递函数(MTF)的变化。

方法采用队列研究设计。收集2015年12月至2016年6月于天津市眼科医院屈光手术中心行SMILE和FS-LASIK的近视患者102例102眼,根据手术方式不同将其分为SMILE组53例53眼和FS-LASIK组49例49眼。采用Pentacam角膜地形图仪和WaveScan像差仪分别在术前和术后1、3、6个月检测角膜形态特征和像差,应用MTF进行计算和分析。比较2个组不同空间频率下不同时间点MTF值变化和术后6个月2个组去除低阶像差后MTF值变化,以及术后6个月SMILE组去除垂直彗差、水平彗差、球差后MTF值的变化。

结果SMILE组和FS-LASIK组术后1、3、6个月各空间频率的MTF值较术前均明显升高,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。SMILE组术后1、3、6个月各空间频率MTF值均高于FS-LASIK组。除55 c/d、60 c/d外,其余空间频率下2个组术后6个月MTF值比较差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后6个月去除低阶像差后,各空间频率下SMILE组的MTF值均明显高于FS-LASIK组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后6个月1 c/d空间频率下SMILE组去除球差、水平彗差后MTF值明显高于去除前MTF值,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.01);1 c/d、3 c/d空间频率下去除垂直彗差后MTF值明显高于去除前MTF值,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),其余空间频率去除单项高阶像差后与术后6个月MTF值比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。

结论SMILE和FS-LASIK术后眼MTF均较术前升高,且SMILE术后MTF值较FS-LASIK术后MTF值略高。

调制传递函数;飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术;飞秒激光辅助准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术;光学质量
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate and compare the changes of modulation transfer function (MTF) after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis(FS-LASIK).

MethodsA cohort study was conducted.One hundred and two myopic patients (102 eyes) who underwent SMILE and FS-LASIK in Tianjin Eye Hospital from December 2015 to June 2016 were enrolled and divided into SMILE group with 53 eyes and FS-LASIK group with 49 eyes according to different surgical methods.The ocular aberrations and corneal morphology of all patients were measured by the Hartman-Shack wave-front analyzer and Pentacam topography before surgery and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.MTF of optic system was calculated and analyzed.The changes of MTF values were compared between the two groups at different time points under different spatial frequencies, after removal of low-order aberrations at postoperative 6 months, and after removal of vertical coma aberration, horizontal coma aberration and spherical aberration in the SMILE group at postoperative 6 months.The study protocol complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by an Ethics Committee of Tianjin Eye Hospital (No.TJYYLL-2014-17). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery.

ResultsCompared with the preoperative MTF, there were significant increases in postoperative 1-, 3- and 6-month MTF at all spatial frequencies in the SMILE group and FS-LASIK group (all at P<0.05). MTF values at all spatial frequencies in the SMILE group were significantly higher than those in the FS-LASIK group at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery (all at P<0.05), except at 55 c/d and 60 c/d at 6 months postoperatively.The postoperative 6-month MTF values at all spatial frequencies without low-order aberration were higher in the SMILE group than those in the FS-LASIK group, showing significant differences between the two groups (all at P<0.05). In the SMILE group, the postoperative 6-month MTF values at 1 c/d spatial frequency without the horizontal coma aberration and spherical aberration were significantly higher than the preoperative MTF values (both at P<0.01); the postoperative 6-month MTF values at 1 c/d and 3 c/d spatial frequency without vertical coma aberration were significantly higher than the preoperative MTF values (both at P<0.05), and there were no statistically significant differences between the postoperative 6-month MTF values at the other spatial frequencies with and without single high-order aberrations (all at P>0.05).

ConclusionsOptic quality has been obviously improved after SMILE and FS-LASIK, and the SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in the MTF value.

Modulation transfer function;Small-incision lenticule extraction;Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis;Optic quality
Wang Yan, Email: mocdef.aabnis.piv3417naygnaw
引用本文

崔彤,王雁,张琳,等. SMILE与FS-LASIK术后调制传递函数在不同空间频率的变化[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2021,39(06):515-521.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210310-00159

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(small-incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)是应用飞秒激光在角膜基质内进行透镜状切割,再从2~5 mm的小切口将透镜取出以矫正屈光不正的手术方法,该术式的安全性、有效性、稳定性,以及可预测性已逐渐得到认可 [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]。SMILE可以更好地维持角膜原有的生物力学结构和表面形态,对神经损伤更小 [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]。然而,在提高患者裸眼视力的同时,提高患者的视觉质量成为了SMILE手术的主要目标。目前临床上评价视觉质量的主要指标是视力和对比敏感度函数,然而这2项指标的测量都需要受检者的主观参与,不能相对客观地反映人眼的视觉质量。研究表明,调制传递函数(modulation transfer function,MTF)可以从不同空间频率客观地描述视觉质量的光学变化 [ 10 ]。以往研究多集中于对SMILE术后角膜MTF的分析,而对术后全眼的MTF研究鲜有报道。本研究拟对SMILE及飞秒激光辅助准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis,FS-LASIK)手术前后的MTF在不同空间频率下的改变进行探讨,以期为屈光手术后视觉质量的变化研究提供参考依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Shah R Shah S Sengupta S Results of small incision lenticule extraction:all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201137(1)∶127-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Sekundo W Kunert KS Blum M Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism:results of a 6 month prospective study[J]Br J Ophthalmol 201195(3)∶335-339. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.174284 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Vestergaard A Ivarsen AR Asp S et al. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate to high myopia:predictability,safety,and patient satisfaction[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201238(11)∶2003-2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Kamiya K Shimizu K Igarashi A et al. Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and smallincision lenticule extraction for myopia[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2014157(1)∶128-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.011 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Sinha Roy A Dupps WJ Jr Roberts CJ . Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and la ser in situ keratomileusis:finite-element analysis [J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201440(6)∶971-980. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.08.065 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Wu D Wang Y Zhang L et al. Corneal biomechanical effects:small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201440(6)∶954-962. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.07.056 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Kamiya K Shimizu K Igarashi A et al. Intraindividual comparison of changes in corneal biomechanical parameters after femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201440(6)∶963-970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Wei S Wang Y Comparison of corneal sensitivity between FS-LASIK and femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) or small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx smile) for myopic eyes[J]Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013251(6)∶1645-1654. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2272-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
He M Huang W Zhong X Central corneal sensitivity after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia:a meta-analysis of comparative studies[J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 201515141[2020-09-28]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.Gov/26499875/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0129-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Villegas EA Alcón E Artal P Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200849(10)∶4688-4696. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2316 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
van Bree MC van Verre HP Devreese MT et al. Straylight values after refractive surgery:screening for ocular fitness in demanding professions[J]Ophthalmology 2011118(5)∶945-953. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Braunstein RE Jain S McCally RL et al. Objective measurement of corneal light scattering after excimer laser keratectomy[J]Ophthalmology 1996103(3)∶439-443. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30674-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Lee K Ahn JM Kim EK et al. Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia[J]Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013251(9)∶2163-2169. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2356-x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
徐路路王雁刘洋辰SMILE与FS-LASIK术后散射变化特性的比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201533(2)∶159-164. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.02.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Xu LL Wang Y Liu YC et al. Characteristics of straylight after small incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201533(2)∶159-164. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.02.013 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
武志清王雁张琳飞秒激光小切口角膜基质内透镜取出术与飞秒激光LASIK术后高阶像差改变的对比研究[J]中华眼科杂志 201551(3)∶193-201. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.03.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wu ZQ Wang Y Zhang L et al. Wavefront analysis and comparison between small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis[J]Chin J Ophthalmol 201551(3)∶193-201. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.03.009 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[16]
Soong HK Malta JB . Femtosecond lasers in ophthalmology[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2009147(2)∶189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.026 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
McCafferty SJ Schwiegerling JT Enikov ET . Corneal surface asphericity,roughness,and transverse contraction after uniform scanning excimer laser ablation[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201253(3)∶1296-1305. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-9267 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
王雁赵堪兴波前像差与临床视觉矫正[M]北京人民卫生出版社 20112.
[19]
Gertnere J Solomatin I Sekundo W Refractive lenticule extraction (ReLEx flex) and wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK:comparison of contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations at 1 year[J]Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013251(5)∶1437-1442. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-012-2220-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
王雁赵堪兴饶丰准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后调制传递函数变化与视觉质量关系的研究[J]中华眼科杂志 200945(7)∶580-586. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2009.07.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang Y Zhao KX Rao F et al. Visual quality evaluation on changes of MTF and wavefront aberration after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]Chin J Ophthalmol 200945(7)∶580-586. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2009.07.002 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A
王雁,Email: mocdef.aabnis.piv3417naygnaw
B
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
C
国家自然科学基金项目 (81470658)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号