调查研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
周边前房深度扫描分析仪对可关闭房角的筛查效能研究–邯郸眼病研究
张烨
李思珍
王宁利
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.03.015
Screening efficiency of scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer for occludable angle–Handan Eye Study
Zhang Ye
Li Sizhen
Wang Ningli
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zhang Ye
Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Ophthalmology & Vision Science Key Lab, Beijing 100730, China
Li Sizhen
Wang Ningli
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.03.015
448
35
0
0
0
1
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

背景原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)是中国人群青光眼患者中常见的类型,对存在房角关闭风险者进行筛查对于PACG的防治具有重要意义。

目的探讨周边前房深度扫描分析仪(SPAC)在中国成人可关闭房角筛查中的效能,寻找最佳参数及其临界值。

方法采用横断面研究,于2013年2–4月在邯郸眼病研究的5年随访调查中纳入年龄≥40岁、无影响房角观察的角膜或结膜病变、无眼部手术或外伤史的受试者180人,在接受视力、验光、裂隙灯显微镜等基本检查后,在暗室下对每位受试者随机选取一眼行SPAC测量和房角镜检查。以静态房角镜检查≥180°时看不到后部小梁网作为定义可关闭房角的标准,用SPAC测得的中央前房深度(ACD)指标和数字分级≤5或定性分级为S/P指标(联合指标)分别进行可关闭房角的筛查判断,建立受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),比较曲线下面积(AUC),对上述2种指标的筛查效能进行评价和比较。

结果共检出可关闭房角者62人,房角开放者118人。与房角开放者相比较,可关闭房角者年龄更大( P<0.001),女性更多( P<0.05),视力更差( P<0.001),等效球镜度数更大( P<0.05),ACD值较低( P<0.001),眼轴长度较短( P<0.001)。用ACD作为筛查指标时可关闭房角的AUC为0.832,ACD临界值为2.7 mm时,其敏感性和特异性分别为85.48%和68.64%,ACD临界值为2.8 mm时,其敏感性和特异性分别为90.32%和61.02%。联合指标筛查可关闭房角的AUC为0.768,敏感性和特异性分别为62.90%和90.68%。

结论SPAC在中国成人可关闭房角的筛查中ACD≤2.8 mm的敏感性最高。

闭角型青光眼/筛查;可关闭房角;横断面研究;周边前房深度扫描分析仪
ABSTRACT

BackgroundPrimary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) is the most common type of glaucoma in China.A screening to identify the possible angle closure is important in the prevention and treatment of PACG.

ObjectiveThis study was to determine the characteristics and the optimal parameters measured by the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer (SPAC) in the screening of occludable angle of a sample of adult Chinese population.

MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed in Handan from February to April in 2013.One hundred and eighty Chinese adults were enrolled with the age of 40 years and older and acceptable criteria during 5-year following-up duration of the Handan Eye Study.Routine eye examinations were carried out in all subjects under the informed consent, including visual acuity, optometry, anterior ocular segment examination under the slit lamp microscope, and then SPAC measurement and gonioscopy were performed in a dark room.Occludable angle was defined as posterior trabecular meshwork being invisible in ≥180° range under the static gonioscope.Occludable angle by SPAC was estimated using available central chamber depth (ACD) and a combined indicator, numerical grade was 5 or fewer and/or the categorical grade was S or P, separately.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was calculated to assess the performance of these parameters in detecting eyes with occludable angle for the population-based sample, and area under curve (AUC) was drown to compare the screening efficiencies between available ACD and combined indicator.

ResultsIn 180 subjects, occludable angles were found in 62 and open angles were in 118.Compared to the subjects with open angle, the subjects with occludable angle showed the older age ( P<0.001), more females ( P<0.05), lower visual acuity ( P<0.001), greater hyperopic diopter ( P<0.05), smaller ACD value ( P<0.001) and shorter axial length( P<0.001). In eyes with occludable angle by using SPAC, the ACD showed an AUC of 0.832.Using a cutoff of 2.7 mm for ACD, the sensitivity and specificity were 85.48% and 68.64%, and under the cutoff of 2.8 mm, the sensitivity and specificity was 90.32% and 61.02%, respectively.For the combined parameters, the sensitivity and specificity was 62.90% and 90.68%, respectively and the AUC was 0.768.

ConclusionsWhen gonioscopy is used as a reference, a cutoff of 2.8 mm ACD by SPAC shows the highest sensitivity for the screening of occludable angle in Chinese population.

Angle-closure glaucoma/screening;Occludable angle;Cross-sectional studies;Scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer
Wang Ningli, Email: mocdef.3ab61.pivilgninw
引用本文

张烨,李思珍,王宁利. 周边前房深度扫描分析仪对可关闭房角的筛查效能研究–邯郸眼病研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2015,33(3):259-262.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.03.015

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
原发性闭角型青光眼(primary angle-closure glaucoma,PACG)是中国青光眼的主要类型,目前,中国40岁以上人群PACG患者达1 010万,致盲率为37.5%~75.0% [ 1 , 2 , 3 ],亟需采取公共卫生措施进行筛查和防治。PACG能够通过激光周边虹膜切除术进行预防性治疗,但已发生周边虹膜前粘连的患者,预防作用明显下降 [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]。可关闭房角是PACG发生的潜在因素,早期正确评估前房的深度和形态对可关闭房角的筛查尤为重要。目前对可关闭房角的评估方法包括裂隙灯显微镜(改良的van Herick分级)法、房角镜检查法、超声生物显微镜(ultrasound biomicroscope,UBM)检查法、A型超声检查法、眼前节光学相干断层成像(anterior chamber optical coherence tomography,AS-OCT)检查法、Scheimpflug成像法(如Pentacam)等 [ 7 ],但这些方法准确性低,存在侵入性、价格昂贵、复现性低、操作复杂及耗时长等缺点,因而其应用受到很大限制。周边前房深度扫描分析仪(scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer,SPAC),能对前房角形态、前房深度及房角关闭的危险性进行客观评估 [ 8 ],但其在房角筛查中的应用少有报道。本研究评价SPAC在可关闭房角人群中的筛查效能,探索最佳筛查参数及其临界值。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Cook C , Foster PJ . Epidemiology of glaucoma:what's new?[J]. Can J Ophthalmol, 2012,47(3):223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.02.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Quiley HA , Broman AT . The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2006,90(3):262-267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Liang YB , Friedman DS , Wong TY ,et al. Prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a rural Chinese adult population:the Handan Eye Study[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008,115(11):1965-1972. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.030 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Nolan WP , Foster PJ , Devereux JG ,et al. YAG laser iridotomy treatment for primary angle closure in East Asian eyes[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2000,84(11):1255-1259. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.11.1255 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Alsagoff Z , Aung T , Ang LP ,et al. Long-term clinical course of primary angle-closure glaucoma in an Asian population[J]. Ophthalmology, 2000,107(12):2300-2304. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00385-7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Thomas R , Parikh R , Muliyil J ,et al. Five-year risk of progression of primary angle closure to primary angle closure glaucoma:a population-based study[J]. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2003,81(5):480-485. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00135.x .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Friedman DS , He M . Anterior chamber angle assessment techniques[J]. Surv Ophthalmol, 2008,53(3):250-273. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.10.012 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Kashiwagi K , Kashiwagi F , Toda Y ,et al. A newly developed peripheral anterior chamber depth analysis system–principle,accuracy,and reproducibility[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2004,88(8):1029-1034. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.036699 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Liang YB , Friedman DS , Wong TY ,et al. Rationale,design,methodology,and baseline data of a population-based study in rural China:the Handan Eye Study[J]. Ophthalmic Epidemiol, 2009,16(2):115-127. doi: 10.1080/09286580902738159 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Kashiwagi K , Tokunaga T , Iwase A ,et al. Usefulness of peripheral anterior chamber depth assessment in glaucoma screening[J]. Eye, 2005,19(9):990-994. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701700 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Baskaran M , Oen FT , Chan YH ,et al. Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure[J]. Ophthalmology, 2007,114(3):501-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
张烨,李思珍,王宁利. 周边前房深度扫描分析仪的可重复性及一致性研究–邯郸眼病研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2014,32(12):1122-1125. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.12.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Lavanya R , Teo L , Friedman DS ,et al. Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster,scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser,and anterior segment optical coherence tomography[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2007,91(8):1023-1026. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.113761 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
邹莉玲,余小金,闵捷,. ROC曲线在医学诊断中的应用与进展[J]. 东南大学学报, 2003,22(1):67-70. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6264.2003.01.025 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Bewick V , Cheek L , Ball J . Statistics review 13:receiver operating characteristic curves[J]. Critical Care, 2004,8(6):508-512. doi: 10.1186/cc3000 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
宋花玲,贺佳,虞慧婷,. 应用ROC曲线下面积对两相关诊断试验进行评价和比较[J]. 第二军医大学学报, 2006,27(5):562-563. doi: 10.3321/j.issn.0258-879X.2006.05.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Lavanya R , Foster PJ , Sakata LM ,et al. Screening for narrow angles in the Singapore population:evaluation of new noncontact screening methods[J]. Ophthalmology, 2008,115(10):1720-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.03.015 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Wong HT , Chua JL , Sakata LM ,et al. Comparison of slit lamp optical coherence tomography and scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer to evaluate angle closure in Asian eyes[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 2009,127(5):599-603. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.41 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Kashiwaqi K , Tsumura T , Tsukahara S . Comparison between newly developed scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and conventional methods of evaluating anterior chamber configuration[J]. J Glaucoma, 2006,15(5):380-387. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212254.17950.0b .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
王宁利,Email: mocdef.3ab61.pivilgninw
B
卫生行业科研专项项目 (201002019)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号