共识与指南
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
前列腺癌同源重组修复基因检测及变异解读专家共识
中华医学会病理学分会
中华医学会泌尿外科学分会
国家病理质控中心
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20220310-00162
Expert consensus on homologous recombination repair gene testing and variant interpretation in prostate cancer
Chinese Society of Pathology
Chinese Medical Association
Chinese Urological Association National Pathology Quality Control Center
Liang Zhiyong
Huang Jian
Authors Info & Affiliations
Chinese Society of Pathology
Chinese Medical Association
Chinese Urological Association National Pathology Quality Control Center
Liang Zhiyong
Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100730, China
Huang Jian
Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20220310-00162
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

同源重组修复是高度保真的DNA双链断裂的修复方式。同源重组修复基因检测对于前列腺癌患者的肿瘤遗传风险评估、治疗决策、预后判断等方面均具有重要意义,涉及适用人群、样本选择、样本处理要求、变异解读与报告等诸多环节。为指导和规范前列腺癌同源重组修复基因检测,中华医学会病理学分会、中华医学会泌尿外科学分会和国家病理质控中心联合制定本共识。

引用本文

中华医学会病理学分会,中华医学会泌尿外科学分会,国家病理质控中心. 前列腺癌同源重组修复基因检测及变异解读专家共识[J]. 中华病理学杂志,2022,51(10):941-949.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20220310-00162

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
DNA损伤应答是机体应对各种内源性或外源性因素造成的DNA损伤的修复系统,其中同源重组修复(homologous recombination repair,HRR)是高度保真的DNA双链断裂(double-strand break,DSB)的修复方式。国内外指南已推荐转移性去势抵抗前列腺癌(metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer,mCRPC)患者进行肿瘤HRR基因检测以指导临床治疗。前列腺癌HRR基因检测涉及多个基因、多种变异类型,主要采用下一代测序(next generation sequencing,NGS)技术。目前,前列腺癌HRR基因检测在产品设计、质控、检测过程、结果解读等环节仍然存在诸多挑战,临床检测质量参差不齐。基于此,中华医学会病理学分会、中华医学会泌尿外科学分会和国家病理质控中心共同制定本共识,以规范前列腺癌HRR基因检测流程,提升检测质量。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Jackson SP , Bartek J . The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease[J]. Nature, 2009,461(7267):1071-1078. DOI: 10.1038/nature08467 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Li X , Heyer WD . Homologous recombination in DNA repair and DNA damage tolerance[J]. Cell Res, 2008,18(1):99-113. DOI: 10.1038/cr.2008.1 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Pilié PG , Tang C , Mills GB ,et al. State-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2019,16(2):81-104. DOI: 10.1038/s41571-018-0114-z .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Abida W , Armenia J , Gopalan A ,et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making[J]. JCO Precis Oncol, 2017, 10.1200/PO.17.00029 . DOI:.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
De Bono JS , Fizazi K , Saad F ,et al. Central, prospective detection of homologous recombination repair gene mutations (HRRm) in tumour tissue from>4000 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) screened for the PROfound study[J]. Annals of Oncology, 2019,30:328-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz248.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Lichtenstein P , Holm NV , Verkasalo PK ,et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland[J]. N Engl J Med, 2000,343(2):78-85. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Edwards SM , Kote-Jarai Z , Meitz J ,et al. Two percent of men with early-onset prostate cancer harbor germline mutations in the BRCA2 gene[J]. Am J Hum Genet, 2003,72(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1086/345310 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
van Asperen CJ , Brohet RM , Meijers-Heijboer EJ ,et al. Cancer risks in BRCA2 families: estimates for sites other than breast and ovary[J]. J Med Genet, 2005,42(9):711-719. DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2004.028829 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Agalliu I , Karlins E , Kwon EM ,et al. Rare germline mutations in the BRCA2 gene are associated with early-onset prostate cancer[J]. Br J Cancer, 2007,97(6):826-831. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603929 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Leongamornlert D , Mahmud N , Tymrakiewicz M ,et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations increase prostate cancer risk[J]. Br J Cancer, 2012,106(10):1697-1701. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.146 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Thompson D , Easton DF ,Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium,et al. Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2002,94(18):1358-1365.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Pritchard CC , Mateo J , Walsh MF ,et al. Inherited DNA-repair gene mutations in men with metastatic prostate cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016,375(5):443-453. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603144 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Na R , Zheng SL , Han M ,et al. Germline mutations in ATM and BRCA1/2 distinguish risk for lethal and indolent prostate cancer and are associated with early age at death[J]. Eur Urol, 2017,71(5):740-747. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.11.033 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Castro E , Romero-Laorden N , Del Pozo A ,et al. PROREPAIR-B: a prospective cohort sStudy of the impact of germline DNA repair mutations on the outcomes of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019,37(6):490-503. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.00358 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Abida W , Campbell D , Patnaik A ,et al. Preliminary results from the TRITON2 study of rucaparib in patients (pts) with DNA damage repair (DDR)-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): updated analyses[J]. Annals of Oncology, 2019,30(suppl 5):327-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz248.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Smith MR , Sandhu SK , Kelly WK ,et al. Phase II study of niraparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and biallelic DNA-repair gene defects (DRD): preliminary results of GALAHAD[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019,37(suppl 7):202. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.7_suppl.202 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Mateo J , Porta N , Bianchini D ,et al. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020,21(1):162-174. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
de Bono J , Mateo J , Fizazi K ,et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020,382(22):2091-2102. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911440 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology:prostate cancer. Version 4, 2022.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
黄健. 中国泌尿外科和男科疾病诊断治疗指南(2021版)[M]. 北京:北京科学出版社, 2021.
[21]
叶定伟. 中国临床肿瘤学会前列腺癌诊疗指南(2022版)[M]. 上海:中国癌症杂志社, 2022.
[22]
Hussain M , Corcoran C , Sibilla C ,et al. Tumor genomic testing for>4, 000 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the phase Ⅲ trial PROfound (Olaparib)[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2022,28(8):1518-1530. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3940 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Vandekerkhove G , Struss WJ , Annala M ,et al. Circulating tumor DNA abundance and potential utility in de novo metastatic prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2019,75(4):667-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.042 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Hennigan ST , Trostel SY , Terrigino NT ,et al. Low abundance of circulating tumor dna in localized prostate cancer[J]. JCO Precis Oncol, 2019,3:P0.19.00176. DOI: 10.1200/PO.19.00176 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[25]
Won YI , Yuh WT , Kwon SW ,et al. Interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a narrative review[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2021,15(Suppl 3):S47-S53. DOI: 10.14444/8163 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
Tukachinsky H , Madison RW , Chung JH ,et al. Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA in 3, 334 patients with advanced prostate cancer identifies targetable BRCA alterations and AR resistance mechanisms[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2021,27(11):3094-3105. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4805 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[27]
《基于下一代测序技术的BRCA1/2基因检测指南(2019版)》编写组. 基于下一代测序技术的BRCA1/2基因检测指南(2019版)[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2019,48(9):670-677. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2019.09.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
李金明. 高通量测序技术[M]. 北京:北京科学出版社, 2018.
[29]
El Messaoudi S , Rolet F , Mouliere F ,et al. Circulating cell free DNA: preanalytical considerations[J]. Clin Chim Acta, 2013,424:222-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.05.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
Mauger F , Dulary C , Daviaud C ,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of methods to isolate, quantify, and characterize circulating cell-free DNA from small volumes of plasma[J]. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2015,407(22):6873-6878. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-8846-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[31]
Richards S , Aziz N , Bale S ,et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology[J]. Genet Med, 2015,17(5):405-424. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[32]
Brnich SE , Abou Tayoun AN , Couch FJ ,et al. Recommendations for application of the functional evidence PS3/BS3 criterion using the ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation framework[J]. Genome Med, 2019,12(1):3. DOI: 10.1186/s13073-019-0690-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[33]
Abou Tayoun AN , Pesaran T , DiStefano MT ,et al. Recommendations for interpreting the loss of function PVS1 ACMG/AMP variant criterion[J]. Hum Mutat, 2018,39(11):1517-1524. DOI: 10.1002/humu.23626 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[34]
Biesecker LG , Harrison SM . The ACMG/AMP reputable source criteria for the interpretation of sequence variants[J]. Genet Med, 2018,20(12):1687-1688. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2018.42 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[35]
ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group. ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Recommendation for de novo Criteria (PS2/PM6)[EB/OL]. Version 1.1[2021-05-05]. https://clinicalgenome.org/site/assets/files/3461/svi_proposal_for_de_novo_criteria_v1_1.pdf.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[36]
ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Working Group. ClinGen Sequence Variant Interpretation Recommendation for in trans Criterion (PM3).[EB/OL ]Version 1.0[2019-05-02]. https://clinicalgenome.org/site/assets/files/3717/svi_proposal_for_pm3_criterion_-_version_1.pdf.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[37]
Li MM , Datto M , Duncavage EJ ,et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of sequence variants in cancer: a joint consensus recommendation of the association for molecular pathology, american society of clinical oncology, and college of american pathologists[J]. J Mol Diagn, 2017,19(1):4-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[38]
中华医学会病理学分会,国家病理质控中心. BRCA1/2数据解读中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2021,50(6):565-571. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20201027-00809 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[39]
Larsson N , Borg A , Hodgson S ,et al. European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN) best practice guidelines for molecular genetics analysis in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer[EB/OL]. 2008. http://www.emqn.org/emqn/digitalAssets/0/232_EMQNBRCAguidelines0908.pdf.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[40]
ENIGMA consortium,ENIGMA BRCA1/2 Gene Variant Classification Criteria[EB/OL]. Version 2.5[2017-06-29]. https://enigmaconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ENIGMA_Rules_2017-06-29-v2.5.1.pdf.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
梁智勇,中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院病理科,北京100730,Email: nc.defhcabmupyzgnail
B
黄健,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科,广州 510630,Email: mocdef.3ab61123zanaijgnauH
C

中华医学会病理学分会, 中华医学会泌尿外科学分会, 国家病理质控中心. 前列腺癌同源重组修复基因检测及变异解读专家共识[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2022, 51(10): 941-949. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20220310-00162.

D

执笔人:吴焕文(中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院病理科,北京100730);何旺(中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院泌尿外科,广州 510630)

E
所有作者声明无利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号