临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
智能脉冲技术的Trans-PRK矫正近视散光术后角膜形态及视觉质量观察
杜玉芹
周春阳
周跃华
李羽
苏丹
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190924-00413
Corneal morphology and visual quality observation after Trans-PRK with smart pulse technology in the correction of myopia and astigmatism
Du Yuqin
Zhou Chunyang
Zhou Yuehua
Li Yu
Su Dan
Authors Info & Affiliations
Du Yuqin
Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Ophthalmopathy Prevention & Cure and Visual Function Protection with TCM, Chengdu 610036, China
Zhou Chunyang
Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Ophthalmopathy Prevention & Cure and Visual Function Protection with TCM, Chengdu 610036, China
Zhou Yuehua
Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Ophthalmopathy Prevention & Cure and Visual Function Protection with TCM, Chengdu 610036, China
Li Yu
Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Ophthalmopathy Prevention & Cure and Visual Function Protection with TCM, Chengdu 610036, China
Su Dan
Eye School of Chengdu University of TCM, Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM, Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province Ophthalmopathy Prevention & Cure and Visual Function Protection with TCM, Chengdu 610036, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190924-00413
317
67
0
1
2
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的观察智能脉冲技术(SPT)及1 050 Hz切削频率的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(Trans-PRK)矫正近视散光术后对角膜形态和视觉质量的影响。

方法采用自身对照病例系列研究方法,选择2017年7月至2018年6月在成都中医大银海眼科医院行Trans-PRK手术的近视散光患者33例65眼,随访时间为6个月,记录裸眼视力(UCVA)(LogMAR)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)(LogMAR)和等效球镜度(SE)。使用Sirius角膜地形图分析仪记录手术前后角膜前表面对称指数(SI),6、7、8、9 mm直径范围下的角膜前表面Q值,前表面球差、彗差、三叶草和总高阶像差,斯特尔比率(SR),水平和垂直子午线方向10、20、30、40 c/d的调制传递函数(MTF),并比较不同时间点各指标差异。各指标相关性分析采用Pearson相关分析。

结果术前BCVA为-0.09±0.06,术后7 d、1个月、3个月、6个月UCVA分别为-0.10±0.08、-0.12±0.06、1.16±0.06、-0.18±0.05;术前SE为(-4.24±1.24)D,术后7 d、1个月、3个月、6个月SE分别为(0.03±0.63)、(0.08±0.53)、(0.02±0.79)、(0.08±0.37)D。术后不同时间点角膜前表面SI值均高于术前,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后1、3个月和6个月不同直径范围的角膜前表面Q值均较术前明显增加,由负值变为正值,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后各时间点角膜前表面三叶草、总高阶像差均较术前增加,术后7 d、6个月的彗差明显高于术前值,术后3个月、6个月的球差明显高于术前值,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后3个月、6个月SR均较术前值明显增加,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。术后6个月,水平子午线不同空间频率MTF值均较术前降低,垂直子午线30、40c/d空间频率MTF值较术前降低,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。相关性分析结果显示,术后6个月不同直径范围Q值与球差( r=0.798~0.925, P<0.05)、总高阶像差( r=0.596~0.630, P<0.05)、SI( r=0.235~0.303, P<0.05)、角膜切削深度( r=0.583~0.659, P<0.05)均呈正相关;SI与球差( r=0.307, P<0.05)、彗差( r=0.424, P<0.05)、总高阶像差( r=0.300, P<0.05)、角膜切削深度( r=0.227, P<0.05)、偏心切削量( r=0.281, P<0.05)呈正相关;SR与像差、角膜切削深度、偏心切削量等均无明显相关性(均 P≥0.05)。

结论使用SPT的Trans-PRK术矫正近视散光术后视力提高、屈光度稳定、视网膜成像质量提升,而角膜前表面的非对称性增大,并引入不同程度的高阶像差。

屈光手术;屈光不正;经上皮,准分子激光;角膜像差
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo observe the corneal morphology and visual quality after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (Trans-PRK) with smart pulse technique (SPT) and 1 050 Hz cutting frequency in the correction of myopia and astigmatism.

MethodsA self-controlled case series study was conducted.Sixty five eyes of 33 patients who underwent Trans-PRK surgery in Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM from July 2017 to June 2018 were followed up for 6 months.The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (LogMAR) unit, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (LogMAR), and spherical equivalent (SE) of the subjects were recorded.The anterior corneal surface symmetry index (SI), the anterior corneal surface Q value in the range of 6, 7, 8, and 9 mm diameter, the spherical aberration, coma, trefoil and total higher-order aberration of the anterior corneal surface, the strehl ratio (SR), and the modulation transfer function (MTF) of 10, 20, 30, and 40 c/d in the horizontal and vertical meridian directions before and after surgery were measured with Sirius corneal topography analyzer.The differences of each index among different time points were compared, and the correlation between indexes was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.This study followed the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Ineye Hospital of Chengdu University of TCM (No.2020yh-004). All patients signed the informed consent form before surgery.

ResultsThe average preoperative BCVA and SE were -0.09±0.06 and (-4.24±1.24)D.The mean UCVA and SE at 7 days, 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively were -0.10±0.08 and (0.03±0.63)D, -0.12±0.06 and (0.08±0.53)D, 1.16±0.06 and (0.02±0.79)D, -0.18±0.05 and (0.08±0.37)D, respectively.The SI at different time points after the surgery were significantly higher than that before operation (all at P<0.05). At 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, the Q value of anterior corneal surface in different diameter ranges increased from negative to positive, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). At each time point after surgery, the trefoil and total higher-order aberrations of the anterior corneal surface increased to varying degrees.Coma at 7 days and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than that before surgery, and spherical aberration at 3 and 6 months after surgery were significantly higher than that before surgery (all at P<0.05). The SR values at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly higher than that before operation (all at P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the MTF values at different spatial frequencies of the horizontal meridian and the MTF values at 30 and 40c/d spatial frequencies of the vertical meridian were lower than those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). The correlation analysis showed that the Q value of different diameter ranges was positively correlated with spherical aberration ( r=0.798-0.925, P<0.05), total higher-order aberration ( r=0.596-0.630, P<0.05), SI ( r=0.235-0.303, P<0.05) and corneal ablation depth ( r=0.583-0.659, P<0.05) at 6 months after surgery.SI was positively correlated with spherical aberration ( r=0.307, P<0.05), coma ( r=0.424, P<0.05), total higher-order aberration ( r=0.300, P<0.05), corneal ablation depth ( r=0.227, P<0.05), and eccentric cutting amount ( r=0.281, P<0.05). There was no correlation between SR and aberration, corneal ablation depth, eccentric cutting amount, etc.(all at P≥0.05).

ConclusionsTrans-PRK using SPT to correct myopic astigmatism can improve vision, stabilize diopter, enhance retinal imaging quality, increase the asymmetry of the anterior corneal surface, and introduce different degrees of higher-order aberrations.

Refractive surgery;Refractive errors;Transepithelial, photorefractive;Corneal aberration
Zhou Yuehua, Email: mocdef.3ab6177663260HY
引用本文

杜玉芹,周春阳,周跃华,等. 智能脉冲技术的Trans-PRK矫正近视散光术后角膜形态及视觉质量观察[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2022,40(11):1078-1084.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190924-00413

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy,Trans-PRK)在矫正屈光不正方面的临床效果已得到广泛认可,大部分患者术后视力恢复较好,但仍有部分患者出现光晕、眩光、夜间视力下降等不良视觉症状 [ 1 ],因此角膜屈光手术术后视觉质量的变化越来越受到重视。目前,智能脉冲技术(smart pulse technology,SPT)和1 050 Hz的切削频率新型技术已应用到Trans-PRK术式中,具有较好的安全性和有效性,并取得了令人满意的临床效果 [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]。然而,关于SPT的Trans-PRK矫正近视散光术后角膜形态及视觉质量的研究相对较少。本研究拟观察近视散光患者SPT及1 050 Hz切削频率的Trans-PRK矫正术前及术后角膜形态和视觉质量变化,并探讨术后角膜形态与视觉质量的相关性,为其临床应用提供一定的指导依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
阳珊李莹姜洋TPRK与FS-LASIK矫正近视散光疗效的比较[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 201921(2)∶122126. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.02.008 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang S Li Y Jiang Y et al. A comparative study of effect after treatment with TPRK and FS-LASIK[J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201921(2)∶122126. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2019.02.008 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[2]
杜玉芹周春阳周跃华智能脉冲技术的TransPRK与SMILE矫正近视的疗效比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 202038(6)∶489493. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200327-00216 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du YQ Zhou CY Zhou YH et al. Comparison of clinical effects between TransPRK with intelligent pulse technology and SMILE for myopia[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202038(6)∶489493. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200327-00216 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
杜玉芹周春阳文龙智能脉冲技术辅助的经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(Trans-PRK)矫正中低度近视[J]眼科新进展 201939(10)∶973975. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0222 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du YQ Zhou CY Wen L et al. Smart pulse technology-assisted transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (Trans-PRK) for the correction of moderate to low myopia[J]Rec Adv Ophthalmol 201939(10)∶973975. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2019.0222 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
杜晓豪张佳苏蒙智能脉冲技术辅助的TransPRK矫正高度近视的效果和安全性评估[J]中华实验眼科杂志 202139(12)∶10531058. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190423-00200 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du XH Zhang J Su M et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of TransPRK assisted by smart pulse technology for high myopia[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202139(12)∶10531058. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190423-00200 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[5]
侯杰王雁左彤LASIK手术对角膜前后表面非球面性的早期影响[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201028(3)∶261266. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0808.2010.03.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Hou J Wang Y Zuo T et al. Short-term influence of LASIK on anterior andposterior corneal asphericity[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201028(3)∶261266. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0808.2010.03.019 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[6]
Bühren J Nagy L Yoon G et al. The effect of the asphericity of myopic laser ablation profiles on the induction of wavefront aberrations[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201051(5)∶28052812. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4604 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
杜显丽刘后仓陈敏不同引导方法LASIK术后角膜非球面性改变及临床分析[J]国际眼科杂志 201212(4)∶599603. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5123.2012.04.01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du XL Liu HC Chen M et al. Effects and change of corneal asphericity after LASIK treatment of myopia with different ablation modes[J]Int Eye Sci 201212(4)∶599603. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5123.2012.04.01 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[8]
Kwon Y Bott S Postsurgery corneal asphericity and spherical aberration due to ablation efficiency reduction and corneal remodelling in refractive surgeries[J]Eye (Lond) 200923(9)∶18451850. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2008.356 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Gatinel D Malet J Hoang-Xuan T et al. Analysis of customized corneal ablations:theoretical limitations of increasing negative asphericity[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200243(4)∶941948.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Tabernero J Klyce SD Sarver EJ et al. Functional optical zone of the cornea[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200748(3)∶10531060. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0867 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Adib-Moghaddam S Soleyman-Jahi S Salmanian B et al. Single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in myopia and astigmatism:18-month follow-up[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201642(11)∶15701578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Wu Y Huang Y Wang SH et al. Comparative study of objective visual quality between FS-LASIK and SMART in myopia[J]Int J Ophthalmol 202215(3)∶502509. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.03.20 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
王雁赵堪兴角膜屈光手术后的高阶像差与视觉质量[J]中华眼科杂志 201147(7)∶664668. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2011.07.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Ondategui JC Vilaseca M Arjona M et al. Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis:comparison using a double-pass system[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 201238(1)∶1627. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.07.037 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
王雁波前像差与临床视觉矫正[M]北京人民卫生出版社 20117788.
[16]
Díaz-Doutón F Benito A Pujol J et al. Comparison of the retinal image quality with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and a double-pass instrument[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 200647(4)∶17101716. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1049 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Zheng YZ Chen YP Qiu Y et al. Analysis of the optical quality by determining the modulation transfer function for anterior corneal surface in myopes[J]Int J Ophthalmol 20125(2)∶196201. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.02.16 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
周跃华,Email: mocdef.3ab6177663260HY
B

杜玉芹:参与选题、试验设计、实施研究、采集数据、资料分析和解释、论文撰写;周跃华:参与选题、设计试验、实施研究、对文章的知识性内容作批判性审阅及定稿;周春阳:设计试验、实施研究、论文修改;李羽、苏丹:参与数据采集

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
成都中医药大学"杏林学者"青年教师创新专项项目 (ZRQN2019001)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号