临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
DSAEK手术植片厚度和大小对角膜内皮细胞密度的远期影响
顾绍峰
彭荣梅
肖格格
冯云
洪晶
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200408-00247
Long-term influence of donor graft thickness and size on corneal endothelial cell density of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty
Gu Shaofeng
Peng Rongmei
Xiao Gege
Feng Yun
Hong Jing
Authors Info & Affiliations
Gu Shaofeng
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Peng Rongmei
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Xiao Gege
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Feng Yun
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
Hong Jing
Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200408-00247
384
43
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨角膜后弹力层剥除联合自动角膜刀取材内皮移植术(DSAEK)供体中央植片厚度(CGT)和大小对角膜内皮细胞密度(ECD)的远期影响。

方法采用系列病例观察研究,收集2013年1月至2017年12月因角膜内皮功能失代偿在北京大学第三医院眼科中心接受DSAEK手术并严格完成2年或以上随访的患者134例144眼。采用角膜内皮镜测量术前供体ECD;术后1、3、6、12和24个月,采用激光扫描共聚焦显微镜测量术后ECD,计算角膜内皮细胞丢失率;采用眼前节光相干断层扫描仪测量供体CGT。根据术后3个月供体CGT将患者分为薄植片组45眼、中等厚植片组66眼和厚植片组33眼,分别为供体CGT<100 μm、≥100~<150 μm和≥150 μm。根据角膜环钻切割的供体植片大小将患者分为小植片组31眼和大植片组113眼,分别为供体植片直径≥7~<8 mm和≥8~<9 mm。比较手术后供体CGT变化及术后不同时间点角膜内皮细胞丢失率;分析术后24个月ECD与术前供体植片ECD、大小及CGT的相关性。

结果术后1、3、6、12和24个月供体CGT分别为129.0(90.8,160.8)、115.5(93.0,146.0)、115.5(89.0,151.0)、112.5(94.3,146.8)和114.0(89.0,144.5)μm,总体比较差异有统计学意义( H=37.369, P<0.001),其中术后1个月供体CGT与术后3个月相比差异有统计学意义( P<0.001)。术后1、3、6、12、24个月,薄植片组、中等厚植片组和厚植片组以及大植片组、小植片组角膜内皮细胞丢失率比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,术后24个月时ECD与术前供体植片ECD呈强正相关( r s =0.783, P<0.001),与供体植片大小和CGT均无明显相关性( r s =0.141, P=0.093; r s =-0.044, P=0.600)。

结论术前供体植片ECD越大,术后ECD越大;供体植片越薄、直径越大,DSAEK术后远期角膜内皮细胞丢失率越低。

角膜;内皮细胞;角膜内皮细胞丢失;角膜内皮细胞密度;角膜后弹力层剥除内皮移植术;供体植片厚度;供体植片大小
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the long-term influence of donor central graft thickness (CGT) and donor graft size on corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

MethodsAn observational case series study was conducted.One hundred and forty-four eyes of 134 patients who underwent DSAEK in Peking University Third Hospital from January 2013 to December 2017 with at least 24-month follow-up were enrolled.Preoperative donor ECD was evaluated by specular microscopy, and ECD was determined by in vivo confocal microscopy at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.Donor CGT was measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography.According to the 3-month postoperative donor CGT, the subjects were divided into thinner graft group (45 eyes with CGT<100 μm), medium-thick graft group (66 eyes with CGT≥100-<150 μm) and thicker graft group (33 eyes with CGT≥150 μm). According to the donor trephination size, the subjects were divided into smaller graft group (31 eyes with trephination size≥7-<8 mm) and larger graft group (113 eyes with trephination size≥8-<9 mm). The changes of the donor CGT and corneal endothelial cell loss rate were compared at different time points after surgery.The relationships between 24-month postoperative ECD and donor ECD, donor graft size and donor CGT were analyzed.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (No.IRB00006761-2008025). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to any medical examination.

ResultsThe donor CGT was 129.0 (90.8, 160.8), 115.5 (93.0, 146.0), 115.5 (89.0, 151.0), 112.5 (94.3, 146.8) and 114.0 (89.0, 144.5) μm at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery, showing a statistically significant difference ( H=37.369, P<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between 1-month and 3-month postoperative CGT ( P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the endothelial cell loss rate among the three different donor CGT groups and between the two different donor graft size groups at any postoperative time points (all at P>0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that the 24-month postoperative ECD was strongly positively correlated with the preoperative donor ECD( r s =0.783, P<0.001), which was not associated with donor graft size and donor CGT ( r s =0.141, P=0.093; r s =-0.044, P=0.600).

ConclusionsLarger postoperative ECD is correlated with larger preoperative ECD of donor graft.Lower long-term corneal endothelial cell loss rate after DSAEK is associated with thinner and larger diameter of donor graft.

Cornea;Endothelial cells;Corneal endothelial cell loss;Corneal endothelial cell density;Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty;Donor graft thickness;Donor graft size
Hong Jing, Email: mocdef.aabnis4691gnijgnoh
引用本文

顾绍峰,彭荣梅,肖格格,等. DSAEK手术植片厚度和大小对角膜内皮细胞密度的远期影响[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2022,40(12):1164-1169.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200408-00247

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
角膜后弹力层剥除联合自动角膜刀取材内皮移植术(Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty,DSAEK)具有排斥反应少、学习曲线短、手术风险小、术后视力恢复快等优点,彻底推动了角膜内皮移植手术在全球的广泛开展,并取代传统的穿透角膜移植术成为目前治疗角膜内皮疾病的主要方法 [ 1 ]。然而随着手术技术的日臻成熟,对手术效果的要求也越来越高。有研究发现,供体角膜内皮移植片越薄,则术后视力恢复越好,内皮细胞丢失率越低 [ 2 , 3 ]。因而在传统的DSAEK基础上,发展出了薄植片手术方案,如超薄DSAEK [ 4 ]。但这一结论目前仍存在很多争议,有大量研究发现供体植片厚度与术后视力、角膜内皮细胞密度(endothelial cell density,ECD)无关 [ 5 , 6 , 7 ],甚至有研究认为薄植片会增加角膜内皮细胞的丢失 [ 8 ]。而中国人的眼部解剖结构与欧美等人群存在明显差异。国外报道的DSAEK手术供体植片多为大植片,直径多为8.5 mm或以上 [ 9 ],国内DSAEK手术的供体植片则多为小植片(直径多为8.0 mm或以下)。而关于小植片DSAEK手术移植片厚度和大小对术后ECD的影响尚未见报道。本研究拟探讨国内DSAEK术后2年供体植片的厚度和大小对ECD的影响,为符合国人眼部特点的小植片DSAEK手术提供研究基础。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
彭荣梅洪晶不同病因对角膜内皮移植术后视力的影响[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201432(5)∶415-419. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.05.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Peng RM , Hong J Influence of different corneal diseases on visual recovery following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201432(5)∶415-419. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.05.007 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[2]
Neff KD , Biber JM , Holland EJ . Comparison of central corneal graft thickness to visual acuity outcomes in endothelial keratoplasty[J]Cornea 201130(4)∶388-391. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f236c6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Acar BT , Akdemir MO , Acar S Visual acuity and endothelial cell density with respect to the graft thickness in Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty:one year results[J]Int J Ophthalmol 20147(6)∶974-979. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.11 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Busin M , Albé E Does thickness matter:ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]Curr Opin Ophthalmol 201425(4)∶312-318. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000071 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Shinton AJ , Tsatsos M , Konstantopoulos A et al. Impact of graft thickness on visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty[J]Br J Ophthalmol 201296(2)∶246-249. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300462 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Van Cleynenbreugel H , Remeijer L , Hillenaar T Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty:effect of intraoperative lenticule thickness on visual outcome and endothelial cell density[J]Cornea 201130(11)∶1195-1200. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821821c7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Terry MA , Shamie N , Chen ES et al. Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty:vision,astigmatism,and endothelial survival[J]Ophthalmology 2009116(2)∶248-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Feizi S , Javadi MA . Effect of donor graft thickness on clinical outcomes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]J Ophthalmic Vis Res 201914(1)∶18-26. DOI: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_55_17 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Romano V , Tey A , Hill NM et al. Influence of graft size on graft survival following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]Br J Ophthalmol 201599(6)∶784-788. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305648 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Tang M , Stoeger C , Galloway J et al. Evaluating DSAEK graft deturgescence in preservation medium after microkeratome cut with optical coherence tomography[J]Cornea 201332(6)∶847-850. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31828a27dd .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Di Pascuale MA , Prasher P , Schlecte C et al. Corneal deturgescence after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty evaluated by Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2009148(1)∶32-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Lass JH , Benetz BA , Patel SV et al. Donor,recipient,and operative factors associated with increased endothelial cell loss in the cornea preservation time study[J]JAMA Ophthalmol 2019137(2)∶185-193. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.5669 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Lekhanont K , Vanikieti K , Nimvorapun N et al. Outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using imported donor corneas[J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 201717(1)∶41[2022-04-15]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28381247/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-017-0436-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Busin M , Patel AK , Scorcia V et al. Microkeratome-assisted preparation of ultrathin grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201253(1)∶521-524. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-7753 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Béal L , Navel V , Pereira B et al. Efficacy of thin and ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and influence of graft thickness on postoperative outcomes:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2022240170-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.022 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Durrani AF , Faith SC , Jhanji V Ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty[J]Curr Opin Ophthalmol 201930(4)∶264-270. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000575 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Mencucci R , Favuzza E , Marziali E et al. Ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty:a fellow-eye comparison[J/OL]Eye Vis (Lond) 2020725[2022-04-15]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32391399/. DOI: 10.1186/s40662-020-00191-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
洪晶,Email: mocdef.aabnis4691gnijgnoh
B

顾绍峰:数据整理、统计分析、论文撰写;彭荣梅:采集数据、分析数据;肖格格、冯云:临床信息的分析和解释;洪晶:研究指导、论文修改及定稿

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
国家自然科学基金项目 (81970768)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号