临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
近视眼SMILE与SPT-TransPRK术后早期视觉质量比较
宁吉良
张立军
孙思宇
闫春晓
陈若语
邢泽群
于涛瑞
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211122-00637
Comparison of early postoperative visual quality between SMILE and SPT-TransPRK
Ning Jiliang
Zhang Lijun
Sun Siyu
Yan Chunxiao
Chen Ruoyu
Xing Zequn
Yu Taorui
Authors Info & Affiliations
Ning Jiliang
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Zhang Lijun
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Sun Siyu
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Yan Chunxiao
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Chen Ruoyu
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Xing Zequn
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
Yu Taorui
Department of Ophthalmology, The Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116033, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211122-00637
856
153
0
0
3
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(SMILE)与智能脉冲技术辅助经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(SPT-TransPRK)术后早期视觉质量的差异和变化情况。

方法采用队列研究方法,选取2021年2—5月于大连医科大学附属大连市第三人民医院行角膜屈光手术者92例92眼,均为右眼入组,其中SMILE组40例40眼,SPT-TransPRK组52例52眼。分别于术前及术后1个月、3个月检查受检者视力,计算有效性,有效性=术后裸眼视力(UCVA)/术前最佳矫正视力;采用AR-1自动电脑验光仪测量屈光度;采用Sirius角膜地形图测量角膜高阶像差(HOA),包括总HOA、球差和彗差;采用OQASⅡ视觉质量分析系统测量客观散射指数(OSI),调制传递函数截止频率(MTF cut-off),斯特列尔比(SR),模拟对比度视力VA100、VA20和VA9(白天、黄昏、夜晚)。

结果术后3个月,SMILE组与SPT-TransPRK组UCVA、有效性比较差异均无统计学意义( Z=0.880, P=0.380; t=0.920, P=0.058),SPT-TransPRK组术后表现为低度远视。术前、术后1个月和术后3个月SMILE组总HOA分别为(0.47±0.18)、(0.70±0.22)和(0.74±0.19)μm,SPT-TransPRK组分别为(0.40±0.14)、(0.98±0.35)和(0.94±0.22)μm;术前、术后1个月和术后3个月SMILE组球差分别为(-0.20±0.09)、(-0.44±0.14)和(-0.44±0.15)μm,SPT-TransPRK组分别为(-0.20±0.10)、(-0.71±0.23)和(-0.75±0.20)μm。2个组术眼手术前后不同时间点总HOA和球差比较,差异均有统计学意义(总HOA: F 分组=13.851, P=0.001; F 时间=29.960, P<0.001.球差: F 分组=31.037, P<0.001; F 时间=48.005, P<0.001),其中2个组术后角膜总HOA、球差均较术前增加,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05);术后1个月和3个月,SMILE组术眼总HOA和球差均小于SPT-TransPRK组,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。2个组术后1个月、3个月角膜彗差较术前增加,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。SMILE组术后1个月OSI高于术前,MTF cut-off、SR和VA9低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05);术后3个月OSI高于术前,SR和VA9低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。SPT-TransPRK组术后1个月OSI高于术前,MTF cut-off、SR、VA100、VA20和VA9低于术前,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05),术后3个月OSI、MTF cut-off、SR、VA100、VA20和VA9与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。2个组间术眼彗差、OSI、MTF cut-off、SR、VA100、VA20和VA9总体比较差异均无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。

结论SMILE和SPT-TransPRK均是矫正近视的有效方法,术后早期视觉质量相似,但相较SPT-TransPRK,SMILE引起更小的角膜总HOA与球差改变。

近视;角膜激光手术;角膜波前像差;飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术;智能脉冲技术辅助经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术;视觉质量
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the differences and changes in early postoperative visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and smart pulse technology-assisted transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (SPT-TransPRK).

MethodsA cohort study was performed.A total of 92 patients (92 eyes) who underwent corneal laser refractive surgery were enrolled in Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University from February 2021 to May 2021.The data from the right eye were collected for analysis.The patients were divided into SMILE group (40 patients, 40 eyes) and SPT-TransPRK group (52 patients, 52 eyes). Preoperative, 1- and 3-month postoperative visual acuity were measured to calculate the effectiveness, which was defined as the ratio of postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) to preoperative best corrected visual acuity.Refraction was measured by an AR-1 autorefractor.Corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) including total HOA, spherical aberration and coma was measured by Sirius corneal topographer.Objective scatter index (OSI), modulation transfer function cut-off frequency (MTF cut-off), Strehl ratio (SR), simulated contrast visual acuity VA100 (day), VA20 (dusk) and VA9 (night) were measured via OQAS II visual quality analysis system.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Dalian Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Dalian Medical University (No.2019-KT-010). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

ResultsThere was no significant difference in 3-month postoperative UCVA and effectiveness between the two groups ( Z=0.880, P=0.380; t=0.920, P=0.058). Patients in SPT-TransPRK group showed mild hyperopia 3 months after surgery.Preoperative, 1- and 3-month postoperative total corneal HOA was (0.47±0.18), (0.70±0.22) and (0.74±0.19)μm in SMILE group, and (0.40±0.14), (0.98±0.35) and (0.94±0.22)μm in SPT-TransPRK group respectively, showing statistically significant differences ( F group=13.851, P=0.001; F time=29.960, P<0.001). Preoperative, 1- and 3-month postoperative spherical aberration was (-0.20±0.09), (-0.44±0.14) and (-0.44±0.15)μm in SMILE group, and (-0.20±0.10), (-0.71±0.23) and (-0.75±0.20)μm in SPT-TransPRK group respectively, showing statistically significant differences ( F group=31.037, P<0.001; F time=48.005, P<0.001). The postoperative total corneal HOA and spherical aberration were increased in both groups compared with before surgery, with statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). The 1- and 3-month postoperative total corneal HOA and spherical aberrations were smaller in SMILE group than in SPT-TransPRK group, and the differences were statistically significant (all at P<0.05). The 1- and 3-month postoperative coma were increased in both groups compared with before surgery, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). In SMILE group, 1-month postoperative OSI was higher and 1-month postoperative MTF cut-off, SR, and VA9 were lower than those before surgery, and 3-month postoperative OSI was higher and 3-month postoperative SR and VA9 were lower than those before surgery, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). In SPT-TransPRK group, 1-month postoperative OSI was higher and 1-month postoperative MTF cut-off, SR, VA100, VA20, and VA9 were lower than those before surgery, showing statistically significant differences (all at P<0.05). There was no significant difference in OSI, MTF cut-off, SR, VA100, VA20, and VA9 between 3 months postoperatively and before surgery in the SPT-TransPRK group (all at P>0.05). There was no significant difference in coma, OSI, MTF cut-off, SR, VA100, VA20, and VA9 between two groups (all at P>0.05).

ConclusionsBoth SMILE and SPT-TransPRK are effective methods for correcting myopia and they have comparable visual quality.Compared with SPT-TransPRK, corneal total HOA and spherical aberration are smaller after SMILE.

Myopia;Corneal surgery, laser;Corneal wavefront aberration;Femtosecond small incision lenticule extraction;Smart pulse technology-assisted transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy;Visual quality
Zhang Lijun, Email: mocdef.labiamgwgnahznujil
引用本文

宁吉良,张立军,孙思宇,等. 近视眼SMILE与SPT-TransPRK术后早期视觉质量比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(08):768-775.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211122-00637

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
本文评分
5 [累计1个]
近视发病率逐年升高,预计2050年全球近视人口将达到47.58亿人,占全球人口的49.8% [ 1 ]。屈光手术是矫治近视、提高近视人群生活质量的重要手段。飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术(small incision lenticule extraction,SMILE)和智能脉冲技术辅助经上皮准分子激光角膜切削术(smart pulse technology-assisted transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy,SPT-TransPRK)是目前基质层与表层角膜激光屈光手术最先进的2种代表术式。研究表明,SMILE和SPT-TransPRK均有良好的安全性、有效性和可预测性 [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]。近年来,屈光手术带来的眩光、光晕和夜间视力下降等视觉质量问题引起了人们的关注。OQAS Ⅱ视觉质量分析系统(西班牙Visiometrics公司)通过收集视网膜点光源图像,并经过双通道技术分析其点扩散函数图像,从而获得客观散射指数(objective scatter index,OSI)、调制传递函数截止频率(modulation transferfunction cut-off frequency,MTF cut-off)、斯特列尔比(Strehl ratio,SR)、模拟对比度视力等客观视觉质量参数。目前,仅少数研究对比了SMILE与准分子激光角膜表面切削术(photorefractive keratectomy,PRK)及准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis,LASEK)术后视觉质量,结果显示SMILE诱导高阶像差(higher-order aberration,HOA)变化更少 [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]。但关于SMILE与SPT-TransPRK术后早期OQAS视觉质量对比研究较少。本研究拟比较SMILE与SPT-TransPRK术后早期角膜像差与OQAS视觉质量,以期为中度近视矫正的术式选择提供参考。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Holden BA , Fricke TR , Wilson DA et al. Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050[J]Ophthalmology 2016,123(5):1036-1042. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
杜玉芹周春阳周跃华智能脉冲技术的TransPRK与SMILE矫正近视的疗效比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2020,38(6):489-493. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200327-00216 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du YQ , Zhou CY , Zhou YH et al. Comparison of clinical effects between TransPRK with intelligent pulse technology and SMILE for myopia[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2020,38(6):489-493. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200327-00216 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
杜晓豪张佳苏蒙智能脉冲技术辅助的TransPRK矫正高度近视的效果和安全性评估[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2021,39(12):1053-1058. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190423-00200 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Du XH , Zhang J , Su M et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of TransPRK assisted by smart pulse technology for high myopia[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2021,39(12):1053-1058. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20190423-00200 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
Lang M , Cao KW , Liu T et al. Five-year results of refractive outcomes and vision-related quality of life after SMILE for the correction of high myopia[J]Int J Ophthalmol 2021,14(9):1365-1370. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2021.09.11 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Sánchez-González JM , Alonso-Aliste F Visual and refractive outcomes of 100 small incision lenticule extractions (SMILE) in moderate and high myopia:a 24-month follow-up study[J]Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019,257(7):1561-1567. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04349-4 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Zhu X , Zou L , Yu M et al. Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia:a 1-year outcome[J/OL]PLoS One 2017,12(8):e0182251[2022-10-20]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28771544/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Yu M , Chen M , Wang B et al. Comparison of visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for mild to moderate myopia[J]J Refract Surg 2015,31(12):795-800. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-02 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Ganesh S , Brar S , Patel U Comparison of ReLEx SMILE and PRK in terms of visual and refractive outcomes for the correction of low myopia[J]Int Ophthalmol 2018,38(3):1147-1154. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-017-0575-6 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Ang M , Gatinel D , Reinstein DZ et al. Refractive surgery beyond 2020[J]Eye (Lond) 2021,35(2):362-382. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-020-1096-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Adib-Moghaddam S , Soleyman-Jahi S , Sanjari Moghaddam A et al. Efficacy and safety of transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 2018,44(10):1267-1279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Wen D , McAlinden C , Flitcroft I et al. Postoperative efficacy,predictability,safety,and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery:a network meta-analysis[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2017,178:65-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
赵姣曾莉刘宗顺SMILE与Trans-PRK手术矫正近视对角膜前表面像差的影响[J]国际眼科杂志 2018,18(3):438-441. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.3.08 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhao J , Zeng L , Liu ZS et al. Effects of SMILE and Trans-PRK on corneal higher order aberrations after myopic correction[J]Int Eye Sci 2018,18(3):438-441. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.3.08 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[13]
Yu M , Chen M , Liu W et al. Comp arative study of wave-front aberration and corneal asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia:a short and long term study [J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 2019,19(1):80[2022-10-22]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30894159/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Lee H , Yong Kang DS , Reinstein DZ et al. Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 2018,44(6):725-733. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.028 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Lin M , Zhou H , Hu Z et al. Comparison of small incision lenticule extraction and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in terms of visual quality in myopia patients[J/OL]Acta Ophthalmol 2021,99(8):e1289-e1296[2022-10-20]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33982437/. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14823 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Zheng Z , Zhang M , Jhanji V et al. Comparison between aberration-free transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and small incision lenticule extraction for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism[J]Int Ophthalmol 2021,41(1):303-314. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01582-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Jun I , Kang D , Reinstein DZ et al. Clinical outcomes of SMILE with a triple centration technique and corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial PRK in high astigmatism[J]J Refract Surg 2018,34(3):156-163. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20180104-03 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
魏荫娟宋慧汤欣光学质量分析系统对不同材质和屈光指数的IOL植入眼视觉质量的评估[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2016,34(3):248-253. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.03.012 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wei YJ , Song H , Tang X Optical quality evaluation of pseudophakic eyes implanted different materials of IOL by optical quality analysis system[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2016,34(3):248-253. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2016.03.012 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[19]
Henriquez MA , Mosquera SA , Camargo J et al. Comparing the vision quality using double-pass technique in eyes with corrected refractive errors and emmetropic eyes[J]Arq Bras Oftalmol 2022,85(5):443-449. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20220050 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Yin Y , Lu Y , Xiang A et al. Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer:a one-year retrospective study[J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 2021,21(1):292[2022-10-25]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34340669/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-021-02048-5 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Shetty R , Francis M , Shroff R et al. Corneal biomechanical changes and tissue remodeling after SMILE and LASIK[J]Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017,58(13):5703-5712. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-22864 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Tomás-Juan J , Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga A , Hanneken L Corneal regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy:a review[J]J Optom 2015,8(3):149-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2014.09.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Wei S , Wang Y , Wu D et al. Ultrastructural changes and corneal wound healing after SMILE and PRK procedures[J]Curr Eye Res 2016,41(10):1316-1325. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1114653 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
Wang QM . Optical visual quality analysis based on double-pass technology[M]// Yu AY . Double-pass optical quality analysis for the clinical practice of cataract. SingaporeSpringer 202111-25. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-0435-5_2.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
张立军,Email: mocdef.labiamgwgnahznujil
B

宁吉良:设计试验、实施研究、分析数据、起草文章;张立军:设计试验、对文章知识性内容的审阅和智力性内容的修改及定稿;孙思宇、闫春晓、陈若语、邢泽群、于涛瑞:实施研究、采集数据、分析数据

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
D
大连市科技创新基金项目 (2019J13SN105)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号