临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
FS-LASIK与FS-LASIK Xtra矫正近视术后角膜上皮重塑状态及角膜像差变化比较
李辰
周跃华
李福生
陶冶
盖珊珊
于嘉
于黎黎
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220222-00070
Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling and corneal aberration changes after FS-LASIK and FS-LASIK Xtra
Li Chen
Zhou Yuehua
Li Fusheng
Tao Ye
Ge Shanshan
Yu Jia
Yu Lili
Authors Info & Affiliations
Li Chen
The Academy of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
Zhou Yuehua
The Academy of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
Beijing Ming Vision and Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, China
Li Fusheng
Beijing Ming Vision and Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, China
Tao Ye
Beijing Ming Vision and Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, China
Ge Shanshan
The Academy of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
Yu Jia
The Academy of Ophthalmology, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
Yu Lili
Beijing Ming Vision and Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220222-00070
0
0
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的探讨飞秒激光辅助准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(FS-LASIK)与FS-LASIK联合角膜胶原交联(FS-LASIK Xtra)术后角膜上皮重塑状态和角膜像差,分析角膜上皮厚度(CET)与角膜像差的关系。

方法采用队列研究方法,纳入2021年6月至2022年2月于成都中医大银海眼科医院接受FS-LASIK的近视患者172例172眼,按手术方式不同分为FS-LASIK组94眼和FS-LASIK Xtra组78眼,共随访6个月。以角膜中央为基点将角膜分为中央2 mm环区和2~5 mm环区,分别于术前及术后1、3和6个月采用眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量角膜中央0~5 mm范围内9个区域的CET,采用iTrace视觉功能分析系统测量角膜高阶像差(HOA),研究主要结局为术后6个月CET增加量(ΔCET)及角膜HOA,分析角膜中央ΔCET与角膜像差的关系。

结果FS-LASIK Xtra组术眼术后1、3和6个月角膜中央、上方、鼻上、鼻侧、鼻下、下方、颞下、颞侧、颞上ΔCET均明显低于FS-LASIK组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK Xtra组术眼术后6个月角膜中央、上方、鼻上、下方、颞下ΔCET明显高于术后1个月,术后3个月和6个月颞侧ΔCET均明显高于术后1个月,术后6个月颞上ΔCET均明显高于术后1个月和3个月,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK组术眼术后3个月和6个月角膜中央、上方、下方、颞下ΔCET均明显高于术后1个月,术后6个月鼻上ΔCET明显高于术后3个月,术后6个月鼻侧、鼻下、颞侧、颞上ΔCET均明显高于术后1个月和3个月,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK Xtra组和FS-LASIK组术眼术后不同时间点垂直三叶草、垂直彗差、水平彗差变化量总体比较差异均无统计学意义(垂直三叶草:χ2分组=4.27,P=0.118;χ2时间=0.01,P>0.05.垂直彗差:χ2分组=5.74,P=0.057;χ2时间=0.08,P=0.957.水平彗差:χ2分组=3.97,P=0.137;χ2时间=0.51,P=0.773)。FS-LASIK Xtra组术眼术后1、3和6个月倾斜三叶草变化量均明显高于FS-LASIK组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK Xtra组术眼术后6个月球差变化量明显高于术后1个月,FS-LASIK组术眼术后6个月明显高于术后1个月和3个月,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK组术眼术后6个月总HOA变化量明显低于术后1个月和3个月,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。FS-LASIK组术后1个月和6个月,角膜中央ΔCET与球差均呈弱正相关(rs=0.257,P=0.008;rs=0.244,P=0.012),与总HOA均呈弱正相关(rs=0.253,P=0.009;rs=0.279,P=0.004)。

结论与FS-LASIK相比,FS-LASIK Xtra术后ΔCET明显较小,但2个组各区域CET增加的均一性相似。2种手术方法术后角膜HOA变化趋势接近,上皮整体分布与角膜像差有一定联系。

近视;角膜激光手术;角膜波前像差;飞秒激光;角膜胶原交联;光学相干断层扫描;角膜上皮重塑
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate the status of corneal epithelial remodeling and changes in corneal aberration after femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and FS-LASIK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking (FS-LASIK Xtra), and to analyze the relationship between corneal epithelial thickness (CET) and corneal aberration.

MethodsA cohort study was conducted.A total of 172 patients (172 eyes) who underwent FS-LASIK at Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were enrolled from June 2021 to February 2022.The 172 eyes were divided into FS-LASIK group (94 eyes) and FS-LASIK Xtra group (78 eyes) according to the surgical procedure, with a total follow-up of 6 months.The cornea was divided into a central 2-mm ring and a ring of 2-5 mm centered on the central cornea.CET at 9 regions in the central 0-5 mm area was measured by OCT before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, and the corneal higher-order aberration (HOA) was measured by the iTrace visual function analyzer.The main outcomes were the increase in CET (ΔCET), and corneal HOA at 6 months after surgery.The relationship between central corneal ΔCET and corneal aberration was analyzed.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yinhai Eye Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No.2021yh-009). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject.

ResultsAt 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, the central, superior, superior nasal, nasal, inferior nasal, inferior, inferior temporal, temporal and superior temporal ΔCET were significantly smaller in FS-LASIK Xtra group than in FS-LASIK group (all at P<0.05). In FS-LASIK Xtra group, 6-month postoperative central, superior, superior nasal, inferior and inferior temporal ΔCET were significantly larger than those at 1 month after surgery, and 3- and 6-month postoperative temporal ΔCET were significantly larger than that at 1 month after surgery, and 6-month postoperative superior temporal ΔCET was significantly larger than those at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all at P<0.05). In FS-LASIK group, 3- and 6-month postoperative central, superior, inferior and inferior temporal ΔCET were significantly larger than those at 1 month after surgery, and 6-month postoperative superior nasal ΔCET was significantly larger than that at 3 months after surgery, and 6-month postoperative nasal, inferior nasal, temporal, superior temporal ΔCET were significantly larger than those at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all at P<0.05). There was no significant difference in vertical trefoil, vertical and horizontal coma changes at different time points after surgery between both groups (vertical trefoil: χ2group=4.27, P=0.118; χ2time=0.01, P>0.05.vertical coma: χ2group=5.74, P=0.057; χ2time=0.08, P=0.957.horizontal coma: χ2group=3.97, P=0.137; χ2time=0.51, P=0.773). The tilted trefoil changes at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery of FS-LASIK Xtra group were significantly larger than those of FS-LASIK group (all at P<0.05). The 6-month spherical aberration change in FS-LASIK Xtra group was significantly higher than that at 1 month after surgery, and the 6-month spherical aberration change in FS-LASIK group was significantly higher than that at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all at P<0.05). The 6-month total HOA change in FS-LASIK group was significantly lower than that at 1 and 3 months after surgery (all at P<0.05). In FS-LASIK group, central corneal ΔCET was weakly positively correlated with spherical aberration at 1 and 6 months after surgery (rs=0.257, P=0.008; rs=0.244, P=0.012), and was weakly positively correlated with total HOA (rs=0.253, P=0.009; rs=0.279, P=0.004).

ConclusionsThe postoperative ΔCET after FS-LASIK Xtra is smaller than that after FS-LASIK, but the homogeneity of ΔCET in each region is similar between the two groups.The changes in corneal HOA after surgery are similar in both groups, and there is a certain association between the overall epithelial distribution and corneal aberration.

Myopia;Corneal surgery, laser;Corneal wavefront aberration;Femtosecond laser;Corneal collagen crosslinking;Optical coherence tomography;Corneal epithelial remodeling
Zhou Yuehua, Email: mocdef.3ab6177663260HY
引用本文

李辰,周跃华,李福生,等. FS-LASIK与FS-LASIK Xtra矫正近视术后角膜上皮重塑状态及角膜像差变化比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(08):782-794.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220222-00070

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
飞秒激光辅助准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis,FS-LASIK)是目前角膜屈光手术领域常用的手术方式之一,其主要优点为术后视力恢复快,视觉质量好,角膜混浊发生率低且术后不适症状轻。然而,FS-LASIK手术中角膜瓣的制作会改变角膜的正常组织结构,降低角膜生物力学的稳定性,并存在术后屈光状态回退或增加角膜扩张的风险[ 1 ]。角膜胶原交联术(corneal collagen crosslinking,CXL)是通过紫外线A激活作为光敏剂的核黄素,使角膜基质胶原纤维之间形成新的共价键(Ⅱ型光化学反应),进而降低角膜的胶原酶活性以增加角膜硬度,从而提高角膜生物力学强度和稳定性的一种新型技术。FS-LASIK联合角膜胶原交联(FS-LASIK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking,FS-LASIK Xtra )可增强术眼的角膜生物力学强度,降低术后角膜扩张等并发症的发生率,特别是高度近视且残留基质床厚度较薄的近视患者、术前检查显示角膜地形图不规则或尚未表现出扩张性危险因素的年轻患者[ 2 , 3 ]。研究发现,高度近视眼接受FS-LASIK Xtra后角膜上皮重塑明显弱于FS-LASIK,角膜稳定性增强及角膜上皮重塑过程减弱可能与近视回退发生率低和/或角膜扩张风险增加等有关[ 4 , 5 ],故开展FS-LASIK Xtra近视矫正手术以改善术后角膜特性的研究受到关注。角膜屈光术后术眼角膜上皮厚度(corneal epithelial thickness,CET)变化反映了角膜的重塑过程,是评估角膜愈合程度的重要指标。了解不同角膜屈光手术术后角膜上皮重塑特点有助于临床医生更好地选择有效安全的手术方式,但FS-LASIK Xtra与FS-LASIK矫正近视术后术眼角膜上皮重塑状态是否不同鲜有报道。此外,目前就我们所知,关于FS-LASIK Xtra术后角膜基质胶原纤维的重建是否会引起角膜像差的改变而影响视觉质量尚无研究报道。本研究拟对FS-LASIK Xtra和FS-LASIK矫正近视术后术眼CET变化过程进行分析和比较,并对术后CET变化与角膜像差变化间的关系进行分析,为临床上角膜屈光手术方法的选择提供参考依据。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Kanellopoulos AJ , Asimellis G , Karabatsas C Comparison of prophylactic higher fluence corneal cross-linking to control,in myopic LASIK,one year results[J]Clin Ophthalmol 2014,8:2373-2381. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S68372 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
Kohnen T , Lwowski C , Hemkeppler E et al. Comparison of femto-LASIK with combined accelerated cross-linking to femto-LASIK in high myopic eyes:a prospective randomized trial[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2020,211:42-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.024 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
Lim L , Lim E A review of corneal collagen cross-linking-current trends in practice applications[J]Open Ophthalmol J 2018,12:181-213. DOI: 10.2174/1874364101812010181 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Kanellopoulos AJ , Asimellis G Epithelial remodeling after femtosecond laser-assisted high myopic LASIK:comparison of stand-alone with LASIK combined with prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking[J]Cornea 2014,33(5):463-469. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000087 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Kanellopoulos AJ , Asimellis G Combined laser in situ keratomileusis and prophylactic high-fluence corneal collagen crosslinking for high myopia:two-year safety and efficacy[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 2015,41(7):1426-1433. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.10.045 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Cho Y , Hieda O , Wakimasu K et al. Multiple linear regression analysis of the impact of corneal epithelial thickness on refractive error post corneal refractive surgery[J]Am J Ophthalmol 2019,207:326-332. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Chen X , Stojanovic A , Liu Y et al. Postoperative changes in corneal epithelial and stromal thickness profiles after photorefractive keratectomy in treatment of myopia[J]J Refract Surg 2015,31(7):446-453. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20150623-02 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Salomão MQ , Hofling-Lima AL , Lopes BT et al. Role of the corneal epithelium measurements in keratorefractive surgery[J]Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017,28(4):326-336. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000379 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
周跃华重视准分子激光角膜屈光手术方式的精准个性化选择[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2019,37(7):497-500. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.07.001 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhou YH . Importance of the precise and personalized selection of laser corneal refractive surgery[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2019,37(7):497-500. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.07.001 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[10]
Reinstein DZ , Archer TJ , Gobbe M et al. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea:three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound[J]J Refract Surg 2008,24(6):571-581. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080601-05 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Reinstein DZ , Gobbe M , Archer TJ et al. Epithelial thickness profile as a method to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking treatment after corneal ectasia[J]J Refract Surg 2011,27(5):356-363. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100930-01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Kanellopoulos AJ , Asimellis G Longitudinal postoperative lasik epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction[J]J Refract Surg 2014,30(3):166-171. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140219-01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Li M , Niu L , Qin B et al. Confocal comparison of corneal reinnervation after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK)[J/OL]PLoS One 2013,8(12):e81435[2022-10-08]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24349069/. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081435 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Ryu IH , Kim BJ , Lee JH et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)[J]J Refract Surg 2017,33(4):250-256. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20170111-01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
王芸张晓峰钱一峰SMILE与FS-LASIK术后角膜上皮修复的对比研究[J]中华眼科杂志 2020,56(2):93-102. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.02.004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang Y , Zhang XF , Qian YF et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK[J]Chin J Ophthalmol 2020,56(2):93-102. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2020.02.004 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[16]
陶冶周跃华李福生FS-LASIK与SMILE术后角膜上皮重塑的比较[J]山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报 2020,34(2):61-66. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Tao Y , Zhou YH , Li FS et al. Comparison of corneal epithelial remodeling after FS-LASIK and SMILE treatment for myopia and astigmatism[J]J Otolaryngol Ophthalmol Shandong Univ 2020,34(2):61-66. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.003 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[17]
Hyun S , Lee S , Kim JH . Visual outcomes after SMILE,LASEK,and LASEK combined with corneal collagen cross-linking for high myopic correction[J]Cornea 2017,36(4):399-405. DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001089 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Yan MK , Chang JS , Chan TC . Refractive regression after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018,46(8):934-944. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13315 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Kang D , Kim SW . Effect of corneal cross-linking on epithelial hyperplasia and myopia regression after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy[J]J Refract Surg 2019,35(6):354-361. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20190422-01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Tan X , Agrawal A , Hammer DX et al. Application of optical coherence tomography and optical path length method for monitoring corneal thickness and refractive index change during corneal cross-linking[J]Appl Opt 2019,58(17):4616-4621. DOI: 10.1364/AO.58.004616 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Lim E , Lim L Review of laser vision correction (LASIK,PRK and SMILE) with simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking - long-term results[J]Curr Eye Res 2019,44(11):1171-1180. DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1656749 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
张耀花王雁飞秒激光角膜屈光手术生物力学效应研究进展[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2020,38(6):534-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200512-00339 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang YH , Wang Y Advances in biomechanical effects of femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2020,38(6):534-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20200512-00339 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[23]
Zhu W , Han Y , Cui C et al. Corneal collagen crosslinking combined with phototherapeutic keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy for corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis[J]Ophthalmic Res 2018,59(3):135-141. DOI: 10.1159/000480242 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[24]
李岚林志荣屈光性角膜胶原交联术的研究进展[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 2020,22(9):717-720. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190519-00143 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li L , Lin ZR . Recent advances in refractive corneal cross-linking[J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020,22(9):717-720. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115909-20190519-00143 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[25]
Reinstein DZ , Silverman RH , Sutton HF et al. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery:anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery[J]Ophthalmology 1999,106(3):474-482. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90105-7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[26]
李福生陶冶尹鸿芝FS-LASIK联合胶原交联术后的早期临床观察[J]国际眼科杂志 2018,18(6):1149-1152. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.6.41 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li FS , Tao Y , Yin HZ et al. Efficacy at early stage after FS-LASIK with accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking[J]Int Eye Sci 2018,18(6):1149-1152. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2018.6.41 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[27]
Haberman ID , Lang PZ , Broncano AF et al. Epithelial remodeling after corneal crosslinking using higher fluence and accelerated treatment time[J]J Cataract Refract Surg 2018,44(3):306-312. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.12.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Rocha KM , Perez-Straziota CE , Stulting RD et al. Epithelial and stromal remodeling after corneal collagen cross-linking evaluated by spectral-domain OCT[J]J Refract Surg 2014,30(2):122-127. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140120-08 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[29]
Ryu IH , Kim WK , Nam MS et al. Reduction of corneal epithelial thickness during medical treatment for myopic regression following FS-LASIK[J/OL]BMC Ophthalmol 2020,20(1):296[2022-10-08]https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32682402/. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01570-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[30]
蒋莎雷晓华谭维娜SMILE联合CXL与SMILE矫正近视眼术后早期疗效和角膜生物力学变化比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2021,39(5):430-438. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20191208-00529 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Jiang S , Lei XH , Tan WN et al. Evaluation and comparison of early outcome and corneal biomechanical changes between SMILE-corneal collagen cross linking and SMILE for myopic eyes[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2021,39(5):430-438. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20191208-00529 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[31]
张丽翟长斌周跃华近视患者角膜地形图引导与波前像差优化的FS-LASIK术后视觉质量比较[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2019,37(11):914-920. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.11.012 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zhang L , Zhai CB , Zhou YH et al. Comparision of visual quality after topography-guided and wavefront-optimized FS-LASIK in myopic eyes[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 2019,37(11):914-920. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.11.012 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
备注信息
A
周跃华,Email:mocdef.3ab6177663260HY
B

李辰:参与选题、设计及实施研究、采集数据、撰写文章;周跃华:文章知识性内容审阅和智力性内容的修改及定稿;李福生、陶冶、盖珊珊:文章知识性内容审阅和智力性内容的修改;于嘉、于黎黎:实施研究、采集数据

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号