目的比较0.05%环孢素与0.1%他克莫司滴眼液治疗慢性眼部移植物抗宿主病(oGVHD)后患者眼表干眼相关指标及泪液炎症因子的改变。
方法采用随机对照研究方法,纳入2020年4月至2021年4月于北京大学第三医院眼科确诊为慢性oGVHD的患者60例60眼,采用随机数字表法将患者分为他克莫司组30例30眼和环孢素组30例30眼。他克莫司组主要采用0.1%他克莫司滴眼液点眼,2次/日;环孢素组采用0.05%环孢素滴眼液点眼,4次/日。此外,2个组患眼均采用0.1%氟米龙滴眼液2次/日、小牛血去蛋白提取物眼用凝胶3次/日、0.1%玻璃酸钠滴眼液8次/日点眼,进行抗炎和润滑治疗。用药后1个月随访并依据排除标准筛选患者,最终将他克莫司组21例21眼和环孢素组12例12眼纳入后续研究。分别于治疗前、治疗后1个月对患眼进行检查,主要评价指标包括眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷评分、角膜荧光素钠染色评分和泪膜破裂时间(BUT)。采用Luminex芯片法检测患眼治疗前后泪液中白细胞介素(IL)-6、IL-8、IL-17、表皮生长因子(EGF)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的质量浓度并进行组间比较。
结果他克莫司组和环孢素组治疗前后OSDI差值分别为0.4(-5.6,21.5)和27.2(4.6,45.0),环孢素组OSDI改善程度明显优于他克莫司组,差异有统计学意义( Z=-2.547, P=0.009)。他克莫司组和环孢素组治疗前后角膜荧光素钠染色评分差值分别为5.0(2.5,10.0)分和3.5(-0.5,13.8)分,BUT差值分别为0.0(-3.0,0.0)s和-1.5(-3.0,0.0)s,组间比较差异均无统计学意义( Z=-0.526、-0.804,均 P>0.05)。他克莫司组与环孢素组治疗前后IL-6、IL-8、IL-17、EGF和TNF-α表达量差值比较,差异均无统计学意义( Z=-0.487、-0.112、-0.412、-1.085、-1.198,均 P>0.05)。
结论2种药物治疗慢性oGVHD后,患者泪液中各因子含量的改变程度均未见显著差异。慢性oGVHD患者应用0.05%环孢素滴眼液治疗可能比0.1%他克莫司滴眼液有更好的舒适度。
ObjectiveTo compare ocular surface dry eye-related indexes and tear cytokine level changes in chronic ocular graft-versus-host disease (oGVHD) patients after receiving topical treatment of 0.05% cyclosporine or 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops.
MethodsA randomized controlled study was conducted.A total of 60 chronic oGVHD patients (60 eyes) were recruited at Beijing University Third Hospital from April 2020 to April 2021.The patients were divided into tacrolimus group and cyclosporine group by a random number table, with 30 patients (30 eyes) in each group.Patients in tacrolimus group used 0.1% tacrolimus eye drops (twice a day) and patients in cyclosporine group used 0.05% cyclosporine eye drops (4 times a day).Additionally, 0.1% flumetholon (twice a day), deproteinized calf blood extract (3 times a day), and 0.1% sodium hyaluronate eye drops (8 times a day) were applied for anti-inflammation and lubrication in both groups.Patients were screened according to exclusion criteria after 1-month treatment.Eventually, 21 patients (21 eyes) in tacrolimus group and 12 patients (12 eyes) in cyclosporine group were included for further study.Patients were examined before and 1 month after treatment.The primary evaluation indexes included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), corneal fluorescein staining scores and tear film break-up time (BUT).Expressions of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-17, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in tears were detected before and after treatment using Luminex chip.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki.The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (No.M2020489).Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before any medical examination.
ResultsThe OSDI differences between before and after treatment were 0.4(-5.6, 2.5) in tacrolimus group and 27.2(4.6, 45.0) in cyclosporine group, and the OSDI improvement was significantly greater in cyclosporine group than in tacrolimus group ( Z=-2.547, P=0.009).The differences of corneal fluorescein staining scores and BUT between before and after treatment were 5.0(2.5, 10.0) scores and 3.5(-0.5, 13.8) seconds in tacrolimus group, 0.0(-3.0, 0.0) scores and -1.5(-3.0, 0.0) seconds in cyclosporine group, respectively, with no significantly difference between both groups ( Z=-0.526, -0.804; both at P>0.05).The differences of IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, EGF and TNF-α expressions between before and after treatment in tacrolimus group and cyclosporine group were not significantly different ( Z=-0.487, -0.112, -0.412, -1.085, -1.198; all at P>0.05).
ConclusionsAltered levels of all tested cytokines in oGVHD tears are of no significant differences between tacrolimus and cyclos porine treatment.In addition, 0.05% cyclosporine eye drops may be more comfortable than 1% tacrolimus for chronic oGVHD patients.
马骄,申展,胡博浩,等. 0.05%环孢素与0.1%他克莫司滴眼液治疗慢性oGVHD后患者眼表干眼相关指标及泪液炎症因子比较[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(10):980-984.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20221008-00473版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
马骄:设计试验、实施研究、采集数据、分析/解释数据、文章撰写;申展、胡博浩、赵英涵、刘姝婉、吴蓉:实施研究、采集数据;彭荣梅:实施研究、采集数据、指导试验;洪晶:酝酿和设计试验、实施研究、对文章的知识性内容作批判性审阅及定稿

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。