目的评估玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗联合激光光凝(IVR+Laser)与单用玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(IVR)治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效和安全性。
方法采用meta分析方法,检索有关IVR+Laser疗法与单用IVR治疗DME的随机对照试验(RCT)文献进行二次分析,检索文献范围包括Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普网、万方数据,检索时间均从建库起至2022年4月。由2位研究员按照纳入和排除标准独立进行文献筛选、资料提取、质量评价并交叉核对后,采用RevMan5.4.1软件进行meta分析,比较不同方法治疗后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心凹厚度(CMT)、平均注射次数和不良事件的差异。
结果共纳入12篇RCT,共1 695眼。meta分析结果显示,随访结束时,IVR+Laser组患者BCVA和CMT改善情况优于IVR组,2个组BCVA变化和CMT变化差异均有统计学意义(WMD=-0.66,95%CI:-1.11~-0.21,P<0.01;WMD=-5.05,95%CI:-9.21~-0.89,P=0.02)。随访结束时,IVR+Laser组平均注射次数明显少于IVR组,差异有统计学意义(WMD=-1.16,95%CI:-2.07~-0.25,P=0.01)。2个组不良事件发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。
结论IVR+Laser联合治疗DME疗效优于单独IVR治疗,安全性与单独IVR治疗相当,且平均注射次数较少。
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab combined with laser (IVR+ Laser) and the intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).
MethodsA meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trial (RCT) literature related to IVR+ Laser therapy and IVR alone for DME.Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, SinoMed, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from their inception to April 2022.Literature screening, data extraction, quality evaluation and cross-checking were conducted independently by two researchers according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.Then a meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software.The two therapies were compared in terms of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), mean number of injections and adverse events.
ResultsTwelve RCTs involving 1 695 eyes were included in the study.Meta-analysis showed that at the end of follow-up, IVR+ Laser demonstrated better improvement in BCVA and CMT than IVR alone, and there were significant differences in the changes in BCVA and CMT between the two groups (weighted mean difference[WMD]=-0.66, 95% confidence interval[CI]: -1.11--0.21, P<0.01; WMD=-5.05, 95%CI: -9.21--0.89, P=0.02).IVR+ Laser required significantly fewer injections than IVR alone (WMD=-1.16, 95%CI: -2.07--0.25, P=0.01).There were no significant differences in the adverse events incidence between the two therapies (all at P>0.05).
ConclusionsThe safety of IVR+ Laser is comparable to IVR alone, and it requires fewer injections for the treatment of DME.
纪东晓,靳英辉,任相颖,等. 单独雷珠单抗玻璃体内注射与联合激光疗法治疗DME疗效和安全性meta分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(10):1004-1010.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220622-00291版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。