临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
眶底爆裂性骨折修复术后持续性复视相关因素分析
郑嵩山
柴昌
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211224-00710
Associated factors of persistent diplopia after orbital floor blowout fracture reconstruction
Zheng Songshan
Chai Chang
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zheng Songshan
People's Hospital of Henan University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
Chai Chang
People's Hospital of Henan University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Eye Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211224-00710
343
35
0
0
2
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的分析眶底爆裂性骨折修复术后持续性复视的影响因素。

方法采用病例对照研究,收集2011年7月至2020年7月在河南省立眼科医院诊治的术后1 d即存在复视的眶底爆裂性骨折患者146例146眼的病历资料,根据观察期间内复视是否持续存在分为持续复视组14例14眼和复视消失组132例132眼,比较2个组不同性别、眼别、年龄、术前病程、术前眶内软组织嵌顿程度、手术方法、手术入路、术后眼球转动锻炼依从性、术后下直肌损伤程度眼数的差异,筛选 P<0.05的因素进行多因素Logistic回归分析。

结果所有患眼均成功地进行了手术,术后随访期间所有患眼均未出现眼眶植入物感染、移位等并发症。2个组间不同年龄分类、术前病程、术前眶内软组织嵌顿程度、手术方法、术后眼球转动锻炼依从性、术后眼外肌损伤程度眼数比较,差异均有统计学意义( χ 2 =9.443, P=0.002; χ 2 =29.041, P<0.001; H=53.943, P<0.001; H=34.583, P<0.001; χ 2 =46.041, P<0.001; H=101.438, P<0.001)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,术前长病程( OR=8.678,95% CI=1.013~74.304, P=0.031)、术前眶内软组织嵌顿(重度: OR=32.963,95% CI=7.647~142.084, P<0.001.中度: OR=11.852,95% CI=2.679~52.436, P=0.001)、术后下直肌损伤(重度: OR=511.000,95% CI=42.815~6 110.808, P<0.001.中度: OR=132.000,95% CI=12.442~1 400.458, P<0.001)是术后持续性复视的独立危险因素。先进的手术方法(个体化塑形钛网法: OR=0.020,95% CI=0.002~0.127, P<0.001.厂家预制钛网法: OR=0.031,95% CI=0.004~0.257, P=0.001)、术后眼球转动锻炼依从性良好( OR=0.015,95% CI=0.001~0.197, P<0.001)是术后持续性复视的独立保护性因素。

结论眶底爆裂性骨折修复术前严重眶内软组织嵌顿和术后下直肌的不可逆损伤是术后持续性复视的主要危险因素,缩短术前病程、改善手术方法、增强术后眼球功能锻炼可降低术后持续性复视的发生率。

眼眶骨折;眼眶手术;并发症;复视;眶底
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo investigate influencing factors of persistent diplopia after orbital floor blowout fracture reconstruction surgery.

MethodsA case control study was conducted.Data of 146 eyes of 146 orbital floor blowout fracture patients with diplopia occurring 1 day after operation were collected in Henan Eye Hospital from July 2011 to July 2020.The patients were divided into two groups, persistent diplopia group (14 cases 14 eyes) and disappeared diplopia group (132 cases 132 eyes), according to the persistence of diplopia in the follow-up.Differences in sex, right or left eye, age, preoperative course of disease, preoperative intraorbital soft tissue hernia, operation methods, operation approach, postoperative eyeball rotation exercise compliance, the number of eyes with postoperative inferior rectus muscle damage level were compared between the two groups to select factors with P<0.05 for multifactor logistic regression analysis.This study protocol adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan Eye Hospital (No.HNEECKY-2021[15]).

ResultsAll eyes were successfully operated and no complications such as infection or dislocation of the orbital implant occurred in any of the eyes during the postoperative follow-up period.There were statistically significant differences in age, preoperative course of disease, preoperative intraorbital soft tissue hernia, operation methods, postoperative eyeball rotation exercise compliance and postoperative inferior rectus muscle injury between the two groups ( χ 2 =9.443, P=0.002; χ 2 =29.041, P<0.001; H=53.943, P<0.001; H=34.583, P<0.001; χ 2 =46.041, P<0.001; H=101.438, P<0.001). The multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that the long preoperative course of disease ( OR=8.678, 95% CI=1.013-74.304, P=0.031), preoperative intraorbital soft tissue hernia (Severe: OR=32.963, 95% CI=7.647-142.084, P<0.001.Moderate: OR=11.852, 95% CI=2.679-52.436, P=0.001), and postoperative inferior rectus muscle injury (Severe: OR=511.000, 95% CI=42.815-6 110.808, P<0.001.Moderate: OR=132.000, 95% CI=12.442-1 400.458, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for postoperative persistent diplopia.Advanced operation methods (Individualized shaped titanium mesh method: OR=0.020, 95% CI=0.002-0.127, P<0.001.Manufacturers prefabricated titanium mesh method: OR=0.031, 95% CI=0.004-0.257, P=0.001), and the postoperative eyeball rotation exercise ( OR=0.015, 95% CI=0.001-0.197, P<0.001) were independent protective factors for postoperative persistent diplopia.

ConclusionsSevere preoperative intraorbital soft tissue hernia and postoperative inferior rectus muscle injury are the main risk factors for persistent postoperative diplopia after orbital floor blowout fracture repair surgery.Shortening the preoperative course of disease, improving the operation methods, and enhancing postoperative ocular functional exercises may reduce the incidence of postoperative persistent diplopia.

Orbital fractures;Orbital operation;Complication;Diplopia;Orbital floor
Zheng Songshan, Email: mocdef.3ab61nahsgnosgnehz
引用本文

郑嵩山,柴昌. 眶底爆裂性骨折修复术后持续性复视相关因素分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2023,41(11):1105-1110.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20211224-00710

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
眼眶爆裂性骨折是指因直径大于眶口的物体钝性作用于眼眶前部,导致眼眶壁薄弱处发生碎裂但眶缘连续性保持完整的骨折 [ 1 ]。当这种骨折发生在眶下壁时,称为眶底爆裂性骨折。复视是眶底爆裂性骨折的一种常见且重要的体征,严重影响患者的生活质量,通常需要手术治疗 [ 2 , 3 , 4 ]。术后持续性复视是眼眶骨折术后常见的并发症,其是评判手术是否成功的重要标准之一 [ 1 ]。Hsu等 [ 5 ]研究发现,眼眶骨折修复术后复视矫正手术的成功率较低,且再次手术的发生率非常高。为减少或避免眶底爆裂性骨折修复术后持续性复视的发生,有必要对眶底爆裂性骨折术后复视持续性存在的原因进行探讨和研究。本研究拟探讨眶底爆裂性骨折修复术后出现持续性复视的可能因素,为其预防和临床治疗提供参考。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
中华医学会眼科学分会眼整形眼眶病学组眼眶爆裂性骨折诊疗专家共识(2014年)[J]中华眼科杂志 201450(8)∶624625. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2014.08.019 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
王毅肖利华与眼眶疾病相关的复视问题及治疗对策[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 201214(5)∶260263. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.05.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Wang Y Xiao LH . Orbital disease related diplopia and its therapy[J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 201214(5)∶260263. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2012.05.002 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[3]
姚登明陈明柴广睿眼眶骨折修复术的临床应用研究进展[J]眼科新进展 201838(3)∶290294. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0068 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yao DM Chen M Chai GR et al. Research advances of clinical applications in repairing surgery for orbital fracture[J]Rec Adv Ophthalmol 201838(3)∶290294. DOI: 10.13389/j.cnki.rao.2018.0068 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
林厚维沈勤范先群. 220例眼眶骨折患者复视的临床分析[J]中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志 20079(5)∶335338. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2007.05.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Lin HW Shen Q Fan XQ . Clinical analysis of the visual acuity and the diplopia of 220 patients with orbital fracture[J]Chin J Optom Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20079(5)∶335338. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-845X.2007.05.013 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[5]
Hsu CK Hsieh MW Chang HC et al. Modified target angle as a predictor of success in strabismus management after orbital fracture[J/OL]J Clin Med 202211(2)∶287[2023-01-22]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35053982. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020287 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Borghol K Turton N Sharp I Experience of orbital floor fractures in a UK level one trauma centre:a focus on the surgical approach and lid-related complications[J]Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 202260(4)∶482487. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.09.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
郑嵩山卜战云柴昌计算机辅助设计与制作技术在眼眶爆裂性骨折治疗中的应用及疗效评价[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201533(8)∶727732. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.08.013 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Zheng SS Bu ZY Chai C Application of computer-aided designing and manufacturing technology in the reconstruction of orbital blow-out fracture[J]Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201533(8)∶727732. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2015.08.013 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[8]
张鹤王丽杰. 3D打印机在眼眶骨折患者个体化预成型钛网中的应用[J]中华实验眼科杂志 201836(2)∶8990. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2018.02.003 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Zhang X Chen W Luo TY et al. Application of three-dimensional printing technology in the orbital blowout fracture reconstruction[J]J Craniofac Surg 201930(6)∶18251828. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005574 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Valencia MR Miyazaki H Ito M et al. Radiological findings of orbital blowout fractures:a review[J]Orbit 202140(2)∶98109. DOI: 10.1080/01676830.2020.1744670 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
李志刚朱豫曹木荣眶壁骨折修复术后斜视和复视的手术治疗[J]中国实用眼科杂志 200927(4)∶413415. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2009.04.032 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li ZG Zhu Y Cao MR . The surgical treatment of strabismus and diplopia after repair of orbital fracture[J]Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 200927(4)∶413415. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2009.04.032 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[12]
沈勤范先群周慧芳眼眶骨折修复手术后残余复视的手术矫正[J]中国实用眼科杂志 201028(4)∶393396. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2010.04.026 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Shen Q Fan XQ Zhou HF et al. Correction of the rernanent diplopia after orbital fracture repair[J]Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 201028(4)∶393396. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2010.04.026 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[13]
Bhate M Deshmukh A Bothra N et al. Clinical profiles and surgical outcomes of strabismus following orbital wall fractures:a large cohort from a tertiary eye care center[J]J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 202259(3)∶172179. DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20210916-01 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
卜战云柴昌郑嵩山眼眶骨折的手术时机与疗效分析[J]中华实验眼科杂志 2011,(12)∶11291130. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2011.12.017 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Jung H Byun JY Kim HJ et al. Prognostic CT findings of diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture[J]J Craniomaxillofac Surg 201644(9)∶14791484. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.06.030 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Jung HN Suh SI Kim HJ et al. Comparison of clinicoradiological findings between patients with recovering diplopia and those with residual diplopia after surgery for pure orbital blowout fracture[J]J Craniomaxillofac Surg 201846(3)∶375380. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.12.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Tahiri Y Lee J Tahiri M et al. Preoperative diplopia:the most important prognostic factor for diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture[J]J Craniofac Surg 201021(4)∶10381041. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e47c45 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[18]
Koryczan P Zapała J Gontarz M et al. Surgical treatment of enophthalmos in children and adolescents with pure orbital blowout fracture[J]J Oral Sci 202163(2)∶129132. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.20-0371 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Pidro A Jovanovic N Kadribašic E et al. Delayed management of an orbital floor blow-out fracture[J]Beyoglu Eye J 20216(3)∶249253. DOI: 10.14744/bej.2021.94834 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
Lee YJ . Orbital floor fracture repair with implants:a retrospective study[J]Arch Craniofac Surg 202122(4)∶177182. DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2020.00640 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[21]
Vasile VA Istrate S Iancu RC et al. Biocompatible materials for orbital wall reconstruction-an overview[J/OL]Materials (Basel) 202215(6)∶2183[2023-01-28]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35329635. DOI: 10.3390/ma15062183 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Parameswaran A Pandey M Panneerselvam E et al. Does intraoperative navigation improve implant position accuracy in orbital fracture repair?[J]Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022[2023-01-28]http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35325573. DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0379 .[published online ahead of print]
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
Graham DO Lim C Coghlan P et al. A literature review of rapid prototyping and patient specific implants for the treatment of orbital fractures[J]Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 202215(1)∶8389. DOI: 10.1177/19433875211004314 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
郑嵩山,Email: mocdef.3ab61nahsgnosgnehz
B

郑嵩山:参与选题、研究设计、实施研究、采集数据、分析数据,文章撰写;柴昌:参与数据采集、统计分析、研究指导

C
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号