论著
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
内镜下胃转流支架系统治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性分析
周艳华
张倩
张澍田
李鹏
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230912-00377
Efficacy and safety of a gastric bypass stent system for the treatment of obesity
Zhou Yanhua
Zhang Qian
Zhang Shutian
Li Peng
Authors Info & Affiliations
Zhou Yanhua
Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
Zhang Qian
Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
Zhang Shutian
Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
Li Peng
Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230912-00377
840
215
0
0
4
2
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的评价内镜下胃转流支架系统对肥胖患者体重和肥胖相关代谢指标的疗效,并评估设备的安全性。

方法选取2021年3月至2022年10月全国多中心随机对照试验中于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院行胃转流支架治疗的14例肥胖患者进行亚组分析。患者入组后行内镜下胃转流支架置入术,12周后经内镜取出,取出后继续随访至36周。主要评价入组12周、24周和36周患者的多余体重减少率、总体重减少率、胰岛素抵抗、转氨酶、血脂和尿酸的变化,以及设备的安全性。

结果14例患者中男9例、女5例,年龄(34.3±7.4)岁,初始体重(104.8±13.9)kg。2例患者因不能耐受消化道不良反应提前取出支架,其余12例患者完成了随访,12周、24周和36周多余体重减少率分别为34.4%±25.5%、39.1%±37.5%和27.3%±40.8%;总体重减少率分别为8.7%±6.2%、10.1%±10.2%和8.3%±13.8%。胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估基线水平为7.03±3.59,12周时为4.81±3.71(与基线相比 P=0.022),24周时为4.17±2.77(与基线相比 P=0.002),36周时为4.66±3.58(与基线相比 P=0.016)。丙氨酸转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT)在基线、12周、24周和36周分别为48(21~124)U/L、39(14~96)U/L、27(10~86)U/L和32(16~113)U/L,ALT下降在24周、36周差异均有统计学意义(与基线相比 P=0.009, P=0.026)。天冬氨酸转氨酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)在基线、12周、24周和36周分别为30(20~62)U/L、24(15~72)U/L、22(11~56)U/L和26(13~74)U/L,AST下降在24周差异有统计学意义(与基线相比 P=0.018)。而血脂、尿酸的变化无统计学意义( P>0.05)。唯一的严重不良事件是在支架取出过程中发生1例食管黏膜撕裂,经内镜下金属夹成功夹闭治疗。所有患者无器械移位、急性胰腺炎或肝脓肿等发生。

结论胃转流支架系统短期内具有良好的减重效果,且相对安全,还可以改善胰岛素抵抗和肝酶。

肥胖;胃转流支架系统;多余体重减少率;总体重减少率;安全性
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a gastric bypass stent system for weight loss and obesity-associated metabolic parameters.

MethodsA sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized control trial was conducted on data of 14 obese patients who were implanted the gastric bypass stent system under endoscopy in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from March 2021 to October 2022. The device was removed after 12 weeks and the patients were followed up for 36 weeks. Outcomes included changes in excess weight loss (EWL), total weight loss (TWL), insulin resistance, liver enzymes, lipids and uric acid at 12, 24 and 36 weeks, and the safety of the device.

ResultsAmong the 14 patients, there were 9 males and 5 females, aged 34.3±7.4 years, with an initial body weight of 104.8±13.9 kg. Stents were removed in advance in 2 patients because of intolerable adverse reactions of the digestive tract. The remaining 12 patients completed follow-up, and their EWL was 34.4%±25.5% at 12 weeks, 39.1%±37.5% at 24 weeks, and 27.3%±40.8% at 36 weeks. TWL was 8.7%±6.2%, 10.1%±10.2% and 8.3%±13.8%, respectively. The levels of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) at 12 weeks (4.81±3.71, P=0.022), 24 weeks (4.17±2.77, P=0.002) and 36 weeks (4.66±3.58, P=0.016) were statistically significant compared with baseline (7.03±3.59). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were 48 (21-124) U/L, 39 (14-96) U/L, 27 (10-86) U/L and 32 (16-113) U/L at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks, respectively, and the changes of ALT were statistically significant at 24 weeks and 36 weeks ( P=0.009, P=0.026 compared with baseline). The levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were 30 (20-62) U/L, 24 (15-72) U/L, 22 (11-56) U/L and 26 (13-74) U/L at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 36 weeks, respectively, and the change of AST was significant at 24 weeks ( P=0.018 compared with baseline). However, the changes of uric acid and serum lipid were not statistically significant ( P>0.05). The only severe adverse event was esophageal mucosal laceration during the process of explantation, which was successfully treated with endoscopic clips. There was no device migration, acute pancreatitis or hepatic abscess.

ConclusionThe gastric bypass stent system, relatively safe, has a good short-term weight loss effect and improves insulin resistance and liver enzymes.

Obesity;Gastric bypass stent system;Excess weight loss;Total weight loss;Security
Li Peng, Email: nc.defudabe.umccgnepil
引用本文

周艳华,张倩,张澍田,等. 内镜下胃转流支架系统治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志,2024,41(01):18-24.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230912-00377

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
本文评分
5 [累计1个]
肥胖是威胁全球和我国居民健康的严重公共卫生问题,目前肥胖和超重在全球范围内呈上升趋势。根据世界卫生组织报告,2016年18岁及以上人群中超重人数超过19亿(39%),其中肥胖人数超过6.5亿(13%)。根据我国的肥胖标准,目前我国约有一半的成年人和20%的儿童存在超重或肥胖 1。肥胖可伴发一系列慢性疾病,包括2型糖尿病、胰岛素抵抗、高血压、高脂血症、非酒精性脂肪性肝病、冠心病等 2。2019年,肥胖导致了500万死亡和1.6亿残疾的发生 3 , 4。因此,肥胖已成为患者和社会的重大公共卫生负担。
肥胖的治疗方法包括改变生活方式、药物治疗和外科减重手术等。但单纯饮食运动控制很少能达到长期的减重效果。新兴的药物治疗虽然可以有效降低体重,但存在可能的药物不良反应。外科减重手术给肥胖患者尤其是重度肥胖患者提供了一种有效的治疗选择,但由于价格昂贵、存在一定的手术风险且不可逆,因而,只有少数肥胖患者选择了外科减重。内镜减重是一种新型的微创、可重复的减重治疗方法,是肥胖及代谢性疾病治疗的新选择。内镜减重的原理主要分为限制摄入和减少吸收两大类。十二指肠空肠内置套管(duodenal-jejunal bypass liner,DJBL)是采用减少吸收的原理来减重的一种内镜下治疗方法,它借鉴外科胃旁路术的原理,以微创介入的方式通过胃镜在十二指肠及空肠上段置入一段长60 cm的内置套管,隔绝了食物和消化液在这段小肠的接触,从而减少了小肠的消化吸收。美国的EndoBarrier是最早应用于临床的十二指肠空肠内置套管,在控制肥胖和改善2型糖尿病方面有一定的疗效 5 , 6 , 7,但其不良反应尤其是肝脓肿 8 , 9限制了其广泛应用。
本研究使用一种新型的十二指肠空肠内置套管——胃转流支架系统来治疗肥胖,评估其在控制体重和肥胖相关代谢指标方面的有效性和安全性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Wang Y , Zhao L , Gao L ,et al. Health policy and public health implications of obesity in China[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 2021,9(7):446-461. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00118-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative CVD Collaborators. The changing patterns of cardiovascular diseases and their risk factors in the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2018,6(12):e1339-e1351. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30407-8 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
GBD 2019 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019[J]. Lancet, 2020,396(10258):1223-1249. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[4]
Roth GA , Mensah GA , Johnson CO ,et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2020,76(25):2982-3021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Jirapinyo P , Haas AV , Thompson CC . Effect of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes with obesity: a meta-analysis with secondary analysis on weight loss and hormonal changes[J]. Diabetes Care, 2018,41(5):1106-1115. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-1985 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Laubner K , Riedel N , Fink K ,et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a case control study [J]. Diabetes Obes Metab, 2018,20(8):1868-1877. DOI: 10.1111/dom.13300 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Ryder REJ , Yadagiri M , Burbridge W ,et al. The United Kingdom's first NHS EndoBarrier service for long-standing poorly controlled type 2 diabetes and obesity: outcomes one year after EndoBarrier removal[J]. Br J Diabetes, 2021:21-76. 83DOI: 10.15277/BJD.2021.295 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Maggi U , Formiga A , Lauro R . Hepatic abscess as a complication of duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve system and review of the literature[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2016,12(5):e47-e50. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.018 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
Betzel B , Drenth J , Siersema PD . Adverse events of the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner: a systematic review[J]. Obes Surg, 2018,28(11):3669-3677. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3441-3 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Gersin KS , Keller JE , Stefanidis D ,et al. Duodenal- jejunal bypass sleeve: a totally endoscopic device for the treatment of morbid obesity[J]. Surg Innov, 2007,14(4):275-278. DOI: 10.1177/1553350607312901 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Ruban A , Miras AD , Glaysher MA ,et al. Duodenal-jejunal bypass liner for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity: a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2022,275(3):440-447. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004980 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
Younus H , Chakravartty S , Sarma DR ,et al. Endobarrier as a pre bariatric surgical intervention in high-risk patients: a feasibility study[J]. Obes Surg, 2018,28(10):3020-3027. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3322-9 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Ren M , Zhou X , Yu M ,et al. Prospective study of a new endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass sleeve in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (with video)[J]. Dig Endosc, 2023,35(1):58-66. DOI: 10.1111/den.14409 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
Courcoulas A , Abu Dayyeh BK , Eaton L ,et al. Intragastric balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Obes (Lond), 2017,41(3):427-433. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2016.229 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[15]
Ponce J , Woodman G , Swain J ,et al. The REDUCE pivotal trial: a prospective, randomized controlled pivotal trial of a dual intragastric balloon for the treatment of obesity[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2015,11(4):874-881. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.006 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Lopez-Nava G , Sharaiha RZ , Vargas EJ ,et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for obesity: a multicenter study of 248 patients with 24 months follow-up[J]. Obes Surg, 2017,27(10):2649-2655. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-017-2693-7 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
Gollisch KS , Lindhorst A , Raddatz D . EndoBarrier gastrointestinal liner in typ e 2 diabetic patients improves liver fibrosis as assessed by liver elastography [J]. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes, 2017,125(2):116-121. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-118961 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
李鹏,Email: nc.defudabe.umccgnepil
B

周艳华:撰写文章、病例信息收集;张倩:医学统计指导;张澍田:文章指导及修改;李鹏:内镜操作、文章指导及修改

C
周艳华, 张倩, 张澍田, 等. 内镜下胃转流支架系统治疗肥胖的疗效和安全性分析[J]. 中华消化内镜杂志, 2024, 41(1): 18-24. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn321463-20230912-00377.
D
所有作者声明不存在利益冲突
E
“登峰”人才培养计划 (DFL20220101)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号