临床研究
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
不同非甾体类抗炎药物对超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后抗炎效果的随机对照研究
葛佳佳
刘晴
周金燕
单晓娜
黄钰森
作者及单位信息
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220309-00094
A randomized controlled study of anti-inflammatory effects of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the postoperative stage of phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens implantation surgery
Ge Jiajia
Liu Qing
Zhou Jinyan
Shan Xiaona
Huang Yusen
Authors Info & Affiliations
Ge Jiajia
Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao 266000, China
Liu Qing
Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao 266000, China
Zhou Jinyan
Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao 266000, China
Shan Xiaona
Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao 266000, China
Huang Yusen
Eye Institute of Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, School of Ophthalmology, Shandong First Medical University, Qingdao 266000, China
·
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220309-00094
381
122
0
0
0
0
PDF下载
APP内阅读
摘要

目的比较2种非甾体类抗炎药物对超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后的抗炎疗效及安全性。

方法采用随机双盲临床对照研究方法,选取2020年10月至2021年2月于山东第一医科大学附属青岛眼科医院就诊的年龄相关性白内障患者90例90眼。采用随机数字表法将患者分为双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组,每组45例45眼,均行超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术,并在围手术期分别点用0.1%新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液(不含防腐剂)4次/日和0.1%溴芬酸钠滴眼液2次/日,连续用药6周。于术前及术后1 d、1周、6周对患者的客观症状进行评估,采用基础泪液分泌试验检测泪液分泌量,采用干眼分析仪记录泪膜破裂时间,在裂隙灯显微镜钴蓝光照射下观察角膜荧光素染色情况,采用裂隙灯显微镜测定前房闪辉并分级,采用光学相干断层扫描仪测量黄斑中央区厚度并检查有无黄斑囊样水肿;同时对视力、眼压及药物安全性和不良反应进行检测和评价。

结果所有受试者手术过程顺利,术中未发生并发症,均按要求完成治疗和随访。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患者主观症状评分术前分别为(0.47±0.73)和(0.47±0.51)分,术后1 d分别为(0.56±0.62)和(0.75±0.61)分,术后1周分别为(0.33±0.48)和(0.64±0.65)分,术后6周分别为(0.51±0.66)和(0.78±0.77)分。不同时间点2个组患者主观症状评分比较差异均有统计学意义( F 组别=5.001, P=0.028; F 时间=2.920, P=0.035),双氯芬酸钠组术后主观症状评分较溴芬酸钠组明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患眼术前泪液分泌量分别为(5.87±2.37)和(7.36±2.74)mm,组间比较差异有统计学意义( F=6.910, P=0.012),术后1周分别为(6.07±2.53)和(6.29±3.46)mm,术后6周分别为(6.29±0.25)和(5.80±2.76)mm,组间比较差异无统计学意义( F=1.121、0.772, P=0.729、0.384)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患者术前非接触泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)分别为(8.00±6.28)和(6.40±5.28)s,术后1周分别为(6.68±5.24)和(4.50±2.46)s,术后6周分别为(6.17±5.00)和(5.39±5.39)s。2个组患者NIBUT比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=3.415, P=0.068);不同时间点NIBUT比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=4.358, P=0.020)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组术后1 d角膜荧光素染色评分分别为(1.40±0.81)和(1.38±0.89)分,术后1周分别为(0.13±0.34)和(0.22±0.47)分,术后6周分别为(0.00±0.00)和(0.00±0.00)分。2个组患者手术后角膜上皮染色评分总体比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=0.110, P=0.741);不同时间点患者角膜荧光素染色评分比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=175.054, P<0.001)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组术后1 d前房闪辉分级分别为1.13±0.51和1.02±0.34,术后1周分别为0.13±0.34和0.16±0.37,术后6周分别为0.00±0.00和0.00±0.00。2个组患者前房闪辉总体比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=0.045, P=0.507)。不同时间点前房闪辉分级比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=322.331, P<0.001)。2个组患者术前、术后6周黄斑中心凹厚度比较,差异均无统计学意义( t=-0.221、-0.374,均 P>0.05)。2个组患者术后6周黄斑囊样水肿发生率均为0%。受试者对2种试验药物的耐受性良好。双氯芬酸钠组术后轻度眼压升高的发生率为6.67%(3/45),溴芬酸钠组为11.1%(5/45)。患者停药1周后眼压均恢复正常。

结论2种非甾体类抗炎药物用于超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后抗炎治疗均安全、有效。新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液舒适度较溴芬酸钠滴眼液好。

非甾体类抗炎药;超声乳化白内障吸除术;前房;炎症;干眼;黄斑水肿
ABSTRACT

ObjectiveTo explore the anti-inflammatory effect and safety of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.

MethodsA randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted.A total of 90 age-related cataract patients (90 eyes) who were diagnosed in Qingdao Eye Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University were enrolled from October 2020 to February 2021.The patients were randomized to diclofenac sodium group and bromofenac sodium group by random number table method, with 45 cases (45 eyes) in each group.All patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation, and 0.1% diclofenac sodium eye drops (preservative-free), 4 times a day, and 0.1% pramiphene eye drops, 2 times a day were applied in the perioperative period.The duration of continuous medication treatment and follow-up time were 6 weeks.The subjective symptoms of the patients were scored before and after surgery.The amount of tear fluid secretion was detected by Schirmer I test, and the tear film breakup time was recorded with the Oculus dry eye analyzer.Corneal fluorescein staining was observed under a slit lamp microscope with cobalt blue light.Anterior chamber flash was measured by slit-lamp biomicroscopy.The thickness of central macular area and the presence of macular cystoid edema was measured by optical coherence tomography.Visual acuity, noncontact intraocular pressure (IOP) and the drug safety were examined and evaluated.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Eye Hospital (No.[2020]60).All patients were informed about the surgery and postoperative medication and signed the informed consent form.

ResultsAll subjects had no intraoperative complications, and completed treatment and follow-up as required.The preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative subjective symptom scores were (0.47±0.73), (0.56±0.62), (0.33±0.48), and (0.51±0.66) points in the diclofenac group, and (0.47±0.51), (0.75±0.61), (0.64±0.65), and (0.78±0.77) points in the bromfenac group.There were statistically significant differences in the subjective symptom scores at different time points between the two groups ( F group=5.001, P=0.028; F time=2.920, P=0.035), and the subjective symptom scores of diclofenac sodium group were significantly lower than those of bromofenac sodium group (all at P<0.05).The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative tear secretion volume were (5.87±2.37), (6.07±2.53), and (6.29±0.25) mm in diclofenac sodium group, and (7.36±2.74), (6.29±3.46), and (5.80±2.76) mm in bromofenac sodium group.There was statistically significant difference in the tear secretion volume between the two groups before surgery ( F=6.910, P=0.012), but there was no significant difference on postoperative weeks 1 and 6 ( F=1.121, 0.772; P=0.729, 0.384).The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) were (8.00±6.28), (6.68±5.24), and (6.17±5.00) seconds in diclofenac sodium group, and (6.40±5.28), (4.50±2.46), and (5.39±5.39) seconds in bromofenac sodium group.There was no significant difference in NIBUT between the two groups ( F group=3.415, P=0.068).There was significant difference in NIBUT within groups among different time points ( F time=4.358, P=0.020).The 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative corneal epithelial staining score were (1.40±0.81), (0.13±0.34), (0.00±0.00) points in diclofenac sodium group, and (1.38±0.89), (0.22±0.47), and (0.00±0.00) points in bromofenac sodium group.There was no statistically significant difference in the corneal epithelial staining score between the two groups after surgery ( F group=0.110, P=0.741).There were statistically significant differences in corneal epithelial staining scores within groups among different time points ( F time=175.054, P<0.01).The 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative anterior chamber flare classification were 1.13±0.51, 0.13±0.34, and 0.00±0.00 in diclofenac sodium group, and 1.02±0.34, 0.16±0.37, and 0.00±0.00 in bromofenac sodium group.There was no significant difference in the overall anterior chamber flash between the two groups ( F group=0.045, P=0.507).There were statistically significant differences in anterior chamber flash within groups among different time points ( F time=322.331, P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the preoperative and 6-week postoperative macular fovea thickness between both groups ( t=-0.221, -0.374; both at P>0.05).The incidence of macular cystoid edema 6 weeks after operation was 0% in both groups.Subjects tolerated the two tested drugs well.Eight adverse events occurred in this study, all of which were mild postoperative IOP elevation, including 3 in diclofenac sodium group with an incidence of 6.67% and 5 in bromofenac group with an incidence of 11.1%.IOP returned to normal in all the patients 1 week after stopping the use of drug.

ConclusionsTwo nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are safe and effective for anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation.The new diclofenac sodium eye drops are more comfortable than bromfenac sodium eye drops.

Anti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidal;Phacoemulsification;Anterior chamber;Inflammation;Dry eye;Macular edema
Huang Yusen, Email: mocdef.6ab21nesuy_gnauh
引用本文

葛佳佳,刘晴,周金燕,等. 不同非甾体类抗炎药物对超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后抗炎效果的随机对照研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2024,42(03):256-263.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220309-00094

PERMISSIONS

Request permissions for this article from CCC.

评价本文
*以上评分为匿名评价
白内障是一种可致盲眼病,随着白内障手术技术和显微器械的改进,手术的创伤性逐渐降低。然而,由于超声乳化释放的热能和手术的机械创伤,白内障术后非感染性炎症反应仍不可避免 [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]。术后不加控制的炎症反应可能会导致严重的不良反应,如虹膜后粘连、葡萄膜炎、假性黄斑水肿和继发性青光眼等。因此,有效控制炎症是白内障手术管理的重要环节 [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]。局部糖皮质激素类药物是术后眼部抗炎的重要手段,但其长时间使用可能会引眼压升高、抗感染能力下降等不良反应 [ 9 ]。非甾体抗炎药也是一种有效的眼部术后炎症治疗药物 [ 5 , 10 ]。白内障术后的眼部炎症可能由血-视网膜屏障破坏和视网膜内液体积聚引发,导致一系列炎症事件 [ 11 , 12 ]。这些炎症反应可能导致术后由短暂性视力损害变为永久性视力损害。双氯芬酸钠可通过抑制环氧化酶来抑制前列腺素的生成和白三烯的合成,是一种强效非甾体类抗炎药 [ 13 ]。传统的双氯芬酸钠滴眼液具有多靶点特性,但由于其较强的刺激性及含有防腐剂,现已逐渐被溴芬酸钠滴眼液取代。新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液采用独立包装,不含防腐剂,且含有玻璃酸钠成分,可减轻刺激症状。目前关于新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液用于白内障术后的研究较少。本试验旨在评价新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液治疗超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体(intraocular lens,IOL)植入术后炎症反应的有效性及安全性。
试读结束,您可以通过登录机构账户或个人账户后获取全文阅读权限。
参考文献
[1]
Li XM , Hu L , Hu J ,et al. Investigation of dry eye disease and analysis of the pathogenic factors in patients after cataract surgery[J]. Cornea 200726(9)∶Suppl 1-S16. 20DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31812f67ca .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[2]
中华医学会眼科学分会白内障与人工晶状体学组我国白内障围手术期非感染性炎症反应防治专家共识(2015年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志 201551(3)∶163-166. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2015.03.002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[3]
季樱红卢奕激素和非甾体类抗炎药在白内障术后联合使用的临床研究[J]. 中国实用眼科杂志 200422(7)∶550-552. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2004.07.021 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Ji YH , Lu Y Clinical study of steroids combined with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after cataract surgery[J]. Chin J Pract Ophthalmol 200422(7)∶550-552. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-4443.2004.07.021 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[4]
Juthani VV , Clearfield E , Chuck RS . Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroids for controlling inflammation after uncomplicated catara ct surgery [J/OL]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 20177(7)∶CD010516[2023-02-12]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670710. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010516.pub2 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[5]
Kim SJ , Flach AJ , Jampol LM . Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in ophthalmology[J]. Surv Ophthalmol 201055(2)∶108-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.07.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[6]
Gulkilik G , Kocabora S , Taskapili M ,et al. Cystoid macular edema after phacoemulsification:risk factors and effect on visual acuity[J]. Can J Ophthalmol 200641(6)∶699-703. DOI: 10.3129/i06-062 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[7]
Saif MYK , Saif M , Saif A ,et al. Predictability and accuracy of IOL formulas in high myopia[J]. J Emmetropia 20167(1)∶17-21.
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[8]
Jung JW , Chung BH , Kim EK ,et al. The effects of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,bromfenac 0.1% and ketorolac 0.45%,on cataract surgery[J]. Yonsei Med J 201556(6)∶1671-1677. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.6.1671 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[9]
El-Harazi SM , Feldman RM . Control of intra-ocular inflammation associated with cataract surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 200112(1)∶4-8. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200102000-00002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[10]
Schalnus R . Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy in ophthalmology[J]. Ophthalmologica 2003217(2)∶89-98. DOI: 10.1159/000068563 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[11]
Lobo CL , Faria PM , Soares MA ,et al. Macular alterations after small-incision cataract surgery[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg 200430(4)∶752-760. DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00582-0 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[12]
McColgin AZ , Heier JS . Control of intraocular inflammation associated with cataract surgery[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 200011(1)∶3-6. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200002000-00002 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[13]
Deka A . Comparative study of topical steroids vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to control postcataract surgery inflammation[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg 202046(10)∶1397-1401. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000291 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[14]
施天严刘朝华双氯芬酸钠滴眼液在人工晶体植入手术前后的应用[J]. 中国基层医药 20018(2)∶11-12. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2001.02.005 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Shi TY , Liu CH . Clinical use of diclofenac sodium eyedrops in the treatment before and after implantation of intraocular lens[J]. Chin J Prim Med Pharm 20018(2)∶11-12. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2001.02.005 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[15]
Donnenfeld ED , Perry HD , Wittpenn JR ,et al. Preoperative ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% in phacoemulsification outcomes:pharmacokinetic-response curve[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg 200632(9)∶1474-1482. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.04.009 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[16]
Cervantes-Coste G , Sánchez-Castro YG , Orozco-Carroll M ,et al. Inhibition of surgically induced miosis and prevention of postoperative macular edema with nepafenac[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 20093219-226. DOI: 10.2147/opth.s4820 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[17]
李妍陈佩卿陈子和三种非甾体抗炎药物在超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入术围手术期的应用研究[J]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版) 202010(2)∶103-109. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.02.007 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li Y , Chen PQ , Chen ZH ,et al. Clinical study of three non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the perioperative period of phacoemulsification surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol Med(Electronic Edition) 202010(2)∶103-109. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-2007.2020.02.007 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[18]
Carreño E , Portero A , Galarreta DJ ,et al. Update on twice-daily bromfenac sodium sesquihydrate to treat postoperative ocular inflammation following cataract extraction[J]. Clin Ophthalmol 20126637-644. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S23381 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[19]
Donnenfeld ED , Holland EJ , Stewart RH ,et al. Bromfenac ophthalmic solution 0.09% (Xibrom) for postoperative ocular pain and inflammation[J]. Ophthalmology 2007114(9)∶1653-1662. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.12.029 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[20]
皇甫镜如严宏白内障术后黄斑水肿的诊治新进展[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 201937(4)∶312-315. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.04.016 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Huangfu JR , Yan H New progress of diagnosis and treatment in pseudophakic cystoid macular edema[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 201937(4)∶312-315. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2019.04.016 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[21]
Kim SJ , Schoenberger SD , Thorne JE ,et al. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cataract surgery:a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology[J]. Ophthalmology 2015122(11)∶2159-2168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.014 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[22]
Sivaprasad S , Bunce C , Wormald R Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents for cystoid macular oedema following cataract surgery:a systematic review[J]. Br J Ophthalmol 200589(11)∶1420-1422. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2005.073817 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[23]
李晓鹏李彦焦军杰白内障超声乳化术对泪膜功能的影响[J]. 国际眼科杂志 201515(4)∶669-671. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.4.27 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Li XP , Li Y , Jiao JJ ,et al. Changes of lacrimal film after phacoemulsification[J]. Int Eye Sci 201515(4)∶669-671. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2015.4.27 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[24]
陈君语潘志强干眼相关角膜上皮损伤的修复[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 202139(3)∶264-268. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20201102-00725 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Chen JY , Pan ZQ . Repair of dry eye-related corneal epithelial damage[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202139(3)∶264-268. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20201102-00725 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[25]
姚克闫晨曦重视白内障围手术期干眼的防治管理[J]. 中华眼科杂志 202056(6)∶409-413. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200130-0004 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yao K , Yan CX . Emphasizing the prevention and management of dry eye during the perioperative period of cataract surgery[J]. Chin J Ophthalmol 202056(6)∶409-413. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200130-0004 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[26]
杨珂朱蕾王滢珲IPL联合睑板腺按摩治疗白内障围手术期MGD相关中重度干眼疗效分析[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志 202341(12)∶1195-1202. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230203-00033 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
Yang K , Zhu L , Wang YH ,et al. Efficacy of intense pulsed light combined with meibomian gland expression for moderate to severe dry eye associated with meibomian gland dysfunction in the cataract perioperative period[J]. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol 202341(12)∶1195-1202. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20230203-00033 .
Goto CitationGoogle Scholar
Baidu Scholar
Wanfang Data
[27]
Erdinest N , London N Letter to the Editor: " Dry eye disease after cataract surgery:study of its determinants and risk factors " [J]. Turk J Ophthalmol 202050(6)∶390-391. DOI: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2020.83893 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
[28]
Sutu C , Fukuoka H , Afshari NA . Mechanisms and management of dry eye in cataract surgery patients[J]. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 201627(1)∶24-30. DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000227 .
返回引文位置Google Scholar
百度学术
万方数据
备注信息
A
黄钰森,Email: mocdef.6ab21nesuy_gnauh
B

葛佳佳:采集及整理数据、统计分析、文章撰写;刘晴:采集数据、统计分析;周金燕、单晓娜:采集数据;黄钰森:酝酿和设计试验、实施研究、文章审阅及定稿

C
http://www.chictr.org.cn,ChiCTR2200061802
D
http://www.chictr.org.cn,ChiCTR2200061802
E
所有作者均声明不存在利益冲突
F
国家自然科学基金面上项目 (81970788)
评论 (0条)
注册
登录
时间排序
暂无评论,发表第一条评论抢沙发
MedAI助手(体验版)
文档即答
智问智答
机器翻译
回答内容由人工智能生成,我社无法保证其准确性和完整性,该生成内容不代表我们的态度或观点,仅供参考。
生成快照
文献快照

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。

0/2000

《中华医学会杂志社用户协议》 | 《隐私政策》

《SparkDesk 用户协议》 | 《SparkDesk 隐私政策》

网信算备340104764864601230055号 | 网信算备340104726288401230013号

技术支持:

历史对话
本文全部
还没有聊天记录
设置
模式
纯净模式沉浸模式
字号