目的比较2种非甾体类抗炎药物对超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体(IOL)植入术后的抗炎疗效及安全性。
方法采用随机双盲临床对照研究方法,选取2020年10月至2021年2月于山东第一医科大学附属青岛眼科医院就诊的年龄相关性白内障患者90例90眼。采用随机数字表法将患者分为双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组,每组45例45眼,均行超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术,并在围手术期分别点用0.1%新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液(不含防腐剂)4次/日和0.1%溴芬酸钠滴眼液2次/日,连续用药6周。于术前及术后1 d、1周、6周对患者的客观症状进行评估,采用基础泪液分泌试验检测泪液分泌量,采用干眼分析仪记录泪膜破裂时间,在裂隙灯显微镜钴蓝光照射下观察角膜荧光素染色情况,采用裂隙灯显微镜测定前房闪辉并分级,采用光学相干断层扫描仪测量黄斑中央区厚度并检查有无黄斑囊样水肿;同时对视力、眼压及药物安全性和不良反应进行检测和评价。
结果所有受试者手术过程顺利,术中未发生并发症,均按要求完成治疗和随访。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患者主观症状评分术前分别为(0.47±0.73)和(0.47±0.51)分,术后1 d分别为(0.56±0.62)和(0.75±0.61)分,术后1周分别为(0.33±0.48)和(0.64±0.65)分,术后6周分别为(0.51±0.66)和(0.78±0.77)分。不同时间点2个组患者主观症状评分比较差异均有统计学意义( F 组别=5.001, P=0.028; F 时间=2.920, P=0.035),双氯芬酸钠组术后主观症状评分较溴芬酸钠组明显降低,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患眼术前泪液分泌量分别为(5.87±2.37)和(7.36±2.74)mm,组间比较差异有统计学意义( F=6.910, P=0.012),术后1周分别为(6.07±2.53)和(6.29±3.46)mm,术后6周分别为(6.29±0.25)和(5.80±2.76)mm,组间比较差异无统计学意义( F=1.121、0.772, P=0.729、0.384)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组患者术前非接触泪膜破裂时间(NIBUT)分别为(8.00±6.28)和(6.40±5.28)s,术后1周分别为(6.68±5.24)和(4.50±2.46)s,术后6周分别为(6.17±5.00)和(5.39±5.39)s。2个组患者NIBUT比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=3.415, P=0.068);不同时间点NIBUT比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=4.358, P=0.020)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组术后1 d角膜荧光素染色评分分别为(1.40±0.81)和(1.38±0.89)分,术后1周分别为(0.13±0.34)和(0.22±0.47)分,术后6周分别为(0.00±0.00)和(0.00±0.00)分。2个组患者手术后角膜上皮染色评分总体比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=0.110, P=0.741);不同时间点患者角膜荧光素染色评分比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=175.054, P<0.001)。双氯芬酸钠组和溴芬酸钠组术后1 d前房闪辉分级分别为1.13±0.51和1.02±0.34,术后1周分别为0.13±0.34和0.16±0.37,术后6周分别为0.00±0.00和0.00±0.00。2个组患者前房闪辉总体比较,差异无统计学意义( F 组别=0.045, P=0.507)。不同时间点前房闪辉分级比较差异有统计学意义( F 时间=322.331, P<0.001)。2个组患者术前、术后6周黄斑中心凹厚度比较,差异均无统计学意义( t=-0.221、-0.374,均 P>0.05)。2个组患者术后6周黄斑囊样水肿发生率均为0%。受试者对2种试验药物的耐受性良好。双氯芬酸钠组术后轻度眼压升高的发生率为6.67%(3/45),溴芬酸钠组为11.1%(5/45)。患者停药1周后眼压均恢复正常。
结论2种非甾体类抗炎药物用于超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后抗炎治疗均安全、有效。新型双氯芬酸钠滴眼液舒适度较溴芬酸钠滴眼液好。
ObjectiveTo explore the anti-inflammatory effect and safety of two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the phacoemulsification combined with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
MethodsA randomized, double-blind, clinical trial was conducted.A total of 90 age-related cataract patients (90 eyes) who were diagnosed in Qingdao Eye Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University were enrolled from October 2020 to February 2021.The patients were randomized to diclofenac sodium group and bromofenac sodium group by random number table method, with 45 cases (45 eyes) in each group.All patients underwent phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation, and 0.1% diclofenac sodium eye drops (preservative-free), 4 times a day, and 0.1% pramiphene eye drops, 2 times a day were applied in the perioperative period.The duration of continuous medication treatment and follow-up time were 6 weeks.The subjective symptoms of the patients were scored before and after surgery.The amount of tear fluid secretion was detected by Schirmer I test, and the tear film breakup time was recorded with the Oculus dry eye analyzer.Corneal fluorescein staining was observed under a slit lamp microscope with cobalt blue light.Anterior chamber flash was measured by slit-lamp biomicroscopy.The thickness of central macular area and the presence of macular cystoid edema was measured by optical coherence tomography.Visual acuity, noncontact intraocular pressure (IOP) and the drug safety were examined and evaluated.This study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qingdao Eye Hospital (No.[2020]60).All patients were informed about the surgery and postoperative medication and signed the informed consent form.
ResultsAll subjects had no intraoperative complications, and completed treatment and follow-up as required.The preoperative, 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative subjective symptom scores were (0.47±0.73), (0.56±0.62), (0.33±0.48), and (0.51±0.66) points in the diclofenac group, and (0.47±0.51), (0.75±0.61), (0.64±0.65), and (0.78±0.77) points in the bromfenac group.There were statistically significant differences in the subjective symptom scores at different time points between the two groups ( F group=5.001, P=0.028; F time=2.920, P=0.035), and the subjective symptom scores of diclofenac sodium group were significantly lower than those of bromofenac sodium group (all at P<0.05).The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative tear secretion volume were (5.87±2.37), (6.07±2.53), and (6.29±0.25) mm in diclofenac sodium group, and (7.36±2.74), (6.29±3.46), and (5.80±2.76) mm in bromofenac sodium group.There was statistically significant difference in the tear secretion volume between the two groups before surgery ( F=6.910, P=0.012), but there was no significant difference on postoperative weeks 1 and 6 ( F=1.121, 0.772; P=0.729, 0.384).The preoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) were (8.00±6.28), (6.68±5.24), and (6.17±5.00) seconds in diclofenac sodium group, and (6.40±5.28), (4.50±2.46), and (5.39±5.39) seconds in bromofenac sodium group.There was no significant difference in NIBUT between the two groups ( F group=3.415, P=0.068).There was significant difference in NIBUT within groups among different time points ( F time=4.358, P=0.020).The 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative corneal epithelial staining score were (1.40±0.81), (0.13±0.34), (0.00±0.00) points in diclofenac sodium group, and (1.38±0.89), (0.22±0.47), and (0.00±0.00) points in bromofenac sodium group.There was no statistically significant difference in the corneal epithelial staining score between the two groups after surgery ( F group=0.110, P=0.741).There were statistically significant differences in corneal epithelial staining scores within groups among different time points ( F time=175.054, P<0.01).The 1-day postoperative, 1-week postoperative, 6-week postoperative anterior chamber flare classification were 1.13±0.51, 0.13±0.34, and 0.00±0.00 in diclofenac sodium group, and 1.02±0.34, 0.16±0.37, and 0.00±0.00 in bromofenac sodium group.There was no significant difference in the overall anterior chamber flash between the two groups ( F group=0.045, P=0.507).There were statistically significant differences in anterior chamber flash within groups among different time points ( F time=322.331, P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the preoperative and 6-week postoperative macular fovea thickness between both groups ( t=-0.221, -0.374; both at P>0.05).The incidence of macular cystoid edema 6 weeks after operation was 0% in both groups.Subjects tolerated the two tested drugs well.Eight adverse events occurred in this study, all of which were mild postoperative IOP elevation, including 3 in diclofenac sodium group with an incidence of 6.67% and 5 in bromofenac group with an incidence of 11.1%.IOP returned to normal in all the patients 1 week after stopping the use of drug.
ConclusionsTwo nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are safe and effective for anti-inflammatory treatment after cataract phacoemulsification combined with IOL implantation.The new diclofenac sodium eye drops are more comfortable than bromfenac sodium eye drops.
葛佳佳,刘晴,周金燕,等. 不同非甾体类抗炎药物对超声乳化白内障吸除联合IOL植入术后抗炎效果的随机对照研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2024,42(03):256-263.
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20220309-00094版权归中华医学会所有。
未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
除非特别声明,本刊刊出的所有文章不代表中华医学会和本刊编委会的观点。
葛佳佳:采集及整理数据、统计分析、文章撰写;刘晴:采集数据、统计分析;周金燕、单晓娜:采集数据;黄钰森:酝酿和设计试验、实施研究、文章审阅及定稿

你好,我可以帮助您更好的了解本文,请向我提问您关注的问题。